Can girth be converted to length by pumping with a thinner tube?

When I started PE again, I used a 2.25” diameter tube, which I packed before the end of each session. I switched to a 2.0” diameter tube when I decided to focus on length. The tube was too small a diameter and so it felt tight and a little uncomfortable. I made relatively fast length gains with the thinner tube for a while. Now it has been slower, though still progressing. My erect girth decreased when switching to the 2.0” from around 6.25” to 5.8” or so. Pumping is not my only routine, I also do hanging. I’m not entirely certain about what contributed more to the length gains since hanging and 2.0” diameter pumping results are slower now. It could also just have been re-noob gains.

Has anyone else had the experience of switching to a smaller diameter tube and then making relatively rapid progress on length?

If girth can be converted to length, does it make sense to use the largest diameter tube to gain penis volume, then convert to a thinner diameter tube to reach the goal penis dimensions?

Also, if girth can be converted to length, doesn’t that indicate that there are other factors to penis enlargement than just stretching the fascia of the penis?

Here’s something more interesting, I used a calculator for penis volume and entered in approximate stats from that time period.

7” x 6.25” is 10.85 fl oz.

8.25” x 5.8” is 11.01 fl oz.

The volume didn’t change much, though the dimensions changed drastically.

What if we’ve been looking at penis enlargement all wrong and the real determining factor is penis volume, not the tunica at all? And what if penis volume is determined by something like the number of smooth muscle cells in the penis, or the maximum penis volume that can be maintained based on relaxed arterial cross section volume to venous output under erection conditions?

Maybe all the connective tissue stretching only causes these other changes by coincidence and we don’t really need to take them into consideration except when determining the final ratio of lenght to girth?

I just realized, typing in my current and goal stats, that I’m about half the volume of my goal measurements. When looking at inches it doesn’t seem that far away, but by volume it’s a huge journey still. If volume is the determinant of possible length to girth ratios though, then I think it’s likely that the larger the penis, the faster it can grow from PE. Though the rate of length and girth is slower as it becomes larger, the rate of volume growth could be speeding up.

Here’s some more interesting stuff around these lines.

Suppose there’s a baseline penis volume determined by something. PE increases that something and so penis volume increases.

My original size was 8”x4.5”. I gained with PE to 9”x6” at the max non-pumped, non-clamped. I stopped using my penis for about a half a year (no masturbation, no sex, and no PE exercises) and then didn’t do PE for many years. My penis shrunk from 9”x6” to 7”x5.2”.

But looking at this by volume tells a very different story from the inch measurements.

My original 8”x4.5” was 6.43 fl oz.
My post PE, post shrinkage from disuse, 7”x5.2” was 7.51 fl oz.

If I take into consideration the 7” measurement was on good days, the volume is even closer to my original volume.

Perhaps, around 7 fl oz. is my natural baseline?

Maybe we should be looking at penis enlargement gains by volume, not by length or girth. If length and girth are arbitrary, then the consensus on PE based on stretching connective tissue is totally wrong.

I really hope this whole thread doesn’t look incoherent tomorrow. I had some eggnog.