Flaccid gains vs erect gains.is there a catchup

Hi guys,

I have a question about flaccid vs. Erect gains.. I’ve been doing PE since the beginning of December last year so I’m a little over two months in. In that time I’ve recorded the following gains:

Flaccid length: 4.5 -> 4.8
FSL: 5.9 -> 6.8
Flaccid girth: 4.5 -> 5

Doesn’t look too bad, huh? However, erect stats don’t match up to the flaccid increases - 6 to 6.2 inches NBP and 5.1 to 5.3 erect girth.
I figured it would stand to reason that whatever I gained in flaccid state should match erect gains fairly closely. Am I missing something here? Why is the erect length gain a quarter of the FSL gain and why is the erect girth gain half of the flaccid girth gain?

Anyone have any answers?

Thanks in advance.

Quite a few vets believe that FSL gains precede erect gains. Like yourself I’ve gained considerably in FL and FSL, but less in EL. I think that’s a pretty normal scenario (where you gain less in EL than FL) that you’re observing.

Congratulations to the gains anyhow!

Gains in flaccid size have no correlation to gains in erect size.

Gains in FSL are believed to show a future gain in BPEL, but again, at what rate and size, is unanswerable.

Doghound, welcome to Thunder’s. There are many threads on this topic. Read Slack’s signature and learn to use the search button; it’s a very useful tool.