Is this normal? Girth question - width vs depth

I can only speak for my own tool.

The width really is quite good, I feel; looking down on it, it’s A-okay. It’s when I get a side view that I start to shudder. The depth is just so much less than the width. If the depth were even close to the width, I’d easily be a 5.5”. Since that’s NOT the case, I’m stuck in HELP!-land.

Is it generally the case that the erect dick is wider than it is deep? Depending on the answer to that, are there any specific approaches that should be followed by the PE’er in those circumstances?

Thats very normal.

Most girt exercises target the CS underside,

PE ‘s of many years have often quiet pronounced depth.

Agreed, it’s totally normal. I expect if you work on girth you’ll probably find your cross-section starts to become more circular (i.e. you’ll gain more ‘depth’ than ‘breadth’).

Yes, it’s pretty common.

CS gains are quite easily and my girth gains mostly come from the depth.

Anyway the most important girth is in the CC since it’s harder than CS.

I have gained in both dimensions. More so in the CC’S. I spent a lot of effort focusing on them. I have definitely gained much more depth as well. Some of it is CS as it had basically doubled in size.