Where do I rank?

If that’s accurate, I would consider that almost huge. But 7”= 6’4” seems high, in my opinion.

What % of males are 7” NBPEL or more? I would have guessed ~ 10%?
What % of males are 6’4” or more? I would have guessed~1%.
I agree with the 6” MSEG.

Bassman70 is ~7” NBPEL x 5.75” girth. He is on borderline betwen somewhat thick and thick. His length is on borderline between somewhat long and long (not sure what criteria the penis museum link uses-BPEL or NBPEL?), So according to that site he would be medium-large or large but not huge. I think that is accurate. Assuming the penis museum stuff is accurate, medium-large (or high end of average) versus large (big) comes down to whether the length data are BPEL or NBPEL measurements? If the former, then he is medium-large. If the latter he is clearly large.

7.25x5.75 is considered huge by penismuseum (long + thick).

I would say they are both around the 5%-10% range. But again I really can’t say definitively.

Interesting concept though.

If you assume the penismuseum uses BPEL measurements. But if penismuseum goes by NBPEL measurements and also take his measuement at just below 5.75” circumference (he does say 5 5/8” girth I think) then he’s medium-large. So basically, same size and depending on how one interprets the data he could anywhere from medium-large to huge. So like the others said, he’s probably large? But it’s easy to see why some of us can be a bit confused.

Dear bassman, going back to your question where you rank with your 7.5 x 5.75, the answer is simple and clear. According to various American and European studies both length and girth belong to the top 5%, which means that of every hundred men 95 are smaller. If an 8 incher is regarded to be huge, then at least you are very big! Be proud of it!

^So that would b the top 5% in length, and the top 5% in girth. However, a lot of the people beating him in length would have nowhere near his girth (long and relatively thin) and a lot of the people beating him in girth would have nowhere near his length (fat and relatively short).

In terms of volume, I’m sure you are in the top 2% at least.

Correct. So that means adding volume to length and girth would not be a bad idea. My present size would be 7.7 x 5.3 \ 17.5, the last number being the volume. Do you know of any studies or surveys of penis volume?

I’m actually around 5 5/8 girth right now. Perhaps it’s my poor erection quality with all the chaos lately. The length 7.5 is bp. I’d be happy enough being in the top 10%, but top 5% is definitely nice if that’s the case.

I’m pretty sure there hasn’t been no. However, I remember one thread (I think it was supersizeit’s thread) where they were discussing the relationship between a mans length and his girth, and I think, using data form somewhere, they established that there was a slight correlation between the two, but it was just that, slight.

That would mean that, for example (and using guess figures), if you were in the top 30% for both length and girth, you may still have a “better” (note inverted commas) penis than 75% of people (being in the top 15% for this) since many longer guys would lack your girth and many thicker guys would lack your length.

I know my friend, when I asked him about his size, he said he was very long but also very very thin. I asked for actually stats and he said he was 7.5” x 3.8”!!! So do know that many people beyond you length wise in the population will have a low girth, and many people beyond you in girth will have a low length.:)

So that means that volume should be added to a man’s statistics. Finding out the average erect volume (EV) can be interesting. Where do I rank? With my 7.7 length I am in the top 4%, with my 5.3 girth I am in the top 20%. Where do I rank with my EV of 17.5? When I compare my stats with those of man-of-10 there is not much difference, his length being 7.6, his girth 5.5 and his EV 18.2. Look at bohm’s statistics: his impressive EV of 22.7 must be in the top 1%. Congratulations! On the other hand, dear readers, we must realize there are more important things in life than a man’s penis size. To be true, penis size must be somewhere in the bottom 5%.

Your big. Some guys would love to be where your at

Charlie S.

I put your values in to the spreadsheet that calculates your percentiles against thundersplace’s statistics etc.

Basically
Length: Of every 11 people, 1 is larger than you. You’re in the 91st percentile
Girth: Of every ~3.5 people, 1 is larger than you. You’re in the 70th percentile.
Volume: Of every 5 people, 1 is larger than you. You’re in the 83rd percentile

Jawbone,

Thank you for the information. The results are not bad at all (to say the least), though there is room for improvement. I’ll let you know!

I clicked the link, but I can’t put my numbers in. If you don’t mind, could you see where 7.5 bp x 5.6 ranks accoding to the site? Thanks.

In my mind I characterize threads like yours way:

“Is my big dick small?”

We get lots posts like that on thunders, usually big-dicked newbies fishing for compliments.

I understand that you are sincere and are really wondering.

BUT:

You have a damn big dick.

There is nothing “just above average” about 7.5 x 5.6 to 5.75.

Stop obsessing and enjoy your very big dick.