2013-14 Penis Size Study, Journal of Sexual Medicine

They used TheyFit condoms for this study, though it isn’t stated anywhere in the actual article. I can’t remember where I found that out, and I’m coming up empty trying to search now, but I did find some other studies done by the same group of researchers using TheyFit condoms:

Reece, M., Herbernick, D., Monahan, P., Sanders, S., & Yarber, W.L. An experimental assessment
Of the TheyFit condom. Annual Meeting of the Association for Standards, Testing, and Materials,
Reno, Nevada, 2005.

Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Monahan, P., Sanders, S., & Yarber, W.L Findings from the experimental
Trial of the TheyFit condom among regular condom users in the United States. Annual Meeting of the
International Organization for Standardization, Berlin, Germany, 2005.

So the researchers were likely using TheyFit’s instructions for measurement, which can be found here: http://www.they … /print-a-fitkit

Length was measured from the bottom, "as far as the condom would unroll on the underside," while the girth measurement was a straightforward MSEG.

Which makes it useless regarding a constant BPEL length measurement I think.

The same kit was used in their study which claimed that; Average length is "only" 5.1”, average circumference is 4.7” in the UK
National Condom Day – myONE® Perfect Fit
They used this FITKIT:
http://www.they … /print-a-fitkit
And the way it measures:"as far as the condom would unroll on the underside," would measure smaller then ontop in many cases. For me on the underside, as far as condom can unroll, my balls are in the way to unroll further. From the side to bone it would be longer then BPEL. The way "as far as the condom would unroll on the underside," thus leads to about 1 inch shorter measurements which I find logical. This somewhat consistent with OP’s study.
The honesty factor is rather high here but the way length is measured is not consistent with other,espacialy medical observed, length surveys. Thus some newspapers, who report on the study, make a wrong assumption that length might be shorter then reported in other studys.

Girth measurments are probably right on the spot and there is not much room for error. Which is consistent with most studys on circumference. I think 4.7 as the mean average is right now set in stone.

If I took that study I would either skew my numbers way up or way down just to get condoms of a rediculus size to use as gag gifts. Can’t trust it

Actually in the above mentioned study they just checked their huge database of customers for their measurements. Of course there might be some jokers or posers but most people go to that site to get a custom fit condom. While most people who pose just buy a XXL trojan magnum over the counter from the hot girl on the check out.

So their survey will surely get a good grasp of real measurements. But its skewed as their length measurement is not consistent with official medical surveys or BPEL .
BUT their girth measurement is consistent with “our” MSEG . And 4.7 is pretty consistent with other studys. I think 4.7 can be safely considered the average girth. But I cant fidna size duistribution which would be interesting.

Oh that’s interesting. But like the guy said, three centimeters girth is hard to believe. But a few whackos aside, the measurements are probably spot on. Measuring from the bottom seems wrong though.

Yeah, but on the other hand, check out those dicks in condom pics from wikipedia. Bottom of condom seems more or less parallel to where you and I would take a ruler on top measurement. So that makes sense t me why the numbers are similar to say Ansel Condom Cancun study. That link again to condom pics:

Category:Penises in condoms
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
http://commons. wikimedia.org/w … ises_in_condoms

Yeah I see what you mean kool, but the condom doesn’t get bone pressed, so I go for the biggest number… For personal reasons. :)

Hey guys I read somewhere that 5 inches girth is classed as big is this true?

5” erect girth is a pretty reasonable girth. I have 6” erect girth and consider that fairly big. 5” I think is bigger than average, but I speak under correction.

5” EG isn’t huge or anything, but I’d consider it slightly above-average based on the studies on here, and it’s definitely not small.

Thanks for the replies guys, what would 5.8 inches be classed as?

Bigger than most. Many would love to be your size.

5.8 EG is freaking thick dude.

I agree. 5” is above average and 5.8” is thick.