Are we proportional

* Admin, please move this thread as needed. *

As I begin to try to establish realistic assumptions of normal penis size through much research, I’m coming to terms with my own size and it’s normality. Thankful as I am to be of a normal size(and growing) and as reassured as I am that I’m at least “average”,
I still can’t help but to find it hard to believe that there are no proven links between penis size and body dimensions. It’s unfortunate that I should ever feel the need to question such a thing but my question(and reason for being here) is the result of a newfound insecurity caused by a spouse’s unfaithfulness.

I realize that there are a percentage of people who, being out of the norm, have penis sizes outside of the average dimensions and it’s not those folks I’m questioning.

So what I’m wondering is this, are we typically proportional? Does the 5’ 10”, 160lb guy with a medium build have just as much chance of being average as the 6’3”, 220lb man? As I look at people who are of a larger build than myself, I see larger dimensions of.. Everything. Bigger feet, hands, arms, legs, torso.. Internal organs I’d assume.. Would I be wrong to also assume that these bigger people have bigger dicks, or is penis size somehow genetically not linked to the rest of the body?

Thanks anyone, for taking the time to comment.. J

No link. The numbers dont lie…

Most extremely well endowed men seem to be on the slightly built side, don’t think anyone knows why. I suppose you could compare it with breast size, its not uncommon to see tiny women with giant boobs (thank you god) and average to large women with smaller ones.

So no, I don’t personaly think we are endowed in proportion.

Lol, good point. Guess we’ve all heard about the thin girl with the gaping hole too. As I’ve always heard the penis is an organ, I assumed that guys with a naturally large torso(not fat) would have bigger organs and therefore bigger dicks. I look forward to laying that thought to rest.

Being a 5’6 guy who started at 5.25 BPEL x 4.3 EG, I definitely believe that penis size is proportional to height. It makes pretty good since for a guy who’s below average in height to have a below average penis. Average guy, average dick. Above average height guy, above average dick.

Truly it WOULD seem to only make sense. The numbers don’t lie as was stated, but I wouldn’t be surprised, if an in depth enough study was conducted, to find that just as we run a 8%+/- or so average range in height, we could correlate that to an average penis size of 5.5”-6.3” nbpl. Just my thinking on this. In a similar fashion, I wouldn’t think you’d see to many 4.8” girth measurements on a large framed 200+lb man. It would be of larger or more corresponding girth. Seems reasonable.

Don’t look for references in the height or build. There’s nothing to it. I had some opportunities to compare women. Small build women had (mostly) larger vaginas, while larger women were tighter. My first girlfriend was the same height as me (5’7) and her vagina was so short that I was about one inch out. And at that time I didn’t even hear about PE !

And, while it’s not the topic for this, it’s still related to misconceptions, I had the opportunity to see that the myths about brothas are just that: myths. I personally saw lots of black people smaller than me - I rephrase that, I never saw one at least as big as me, except for the movies. Truth be said, I speak about non-erect length, but I still have my doubts about the “statistics”.

Back to topic: If there was any correlation height-length, don’t you think you’d have seen already some porn with a basketball player hanging a yard long dick ?

That’s a good point too. Think maybe there’s just more money chasing a big ball around than shaking two little ones?

No correlation here.
I know someone who is 6’4” and 200lbs of 90% muscle. He is tiny in the pants.
I know another kid who is 6’5 and 140lbs of skin and bone. He’s dong is huge.
Myself.. I’m about 5’6” and around 200lbs before I started PE. I was about a 7x5 dick. Now I’m 185lbs and have an 8x5.75”.

There is no correlation to height, race, weight, anything. Genetic and luck.

Great point.

I noticed a lot of tall(er) people have proportionately bigger extremities, but it has been proven numerous times that penis is not included in that rule. I personally saw few examples in locker room that support that. Who knows why…

Same goes for breasts.

It would seem to make sense.

I am 5’6” and 145lbs and my unit started at 6.75” by 5”.

The penis isn’t part of the skeleton, and its growth is controlled by rather different factors from those controlling skeletal growth. That’s why its correlation to the size of other body parts is weaker than might be expected.

Yeah, especially if there is a good plastic surgeon in the area.

Now theres a great point shattered all to hell.

Or maybe being a smaller guy you did less sport during puberty so had less testosterone production which caused your dick to not reach it’s full potential. Where as tall guys who are good looking generally will do tons of sport and get a bigger dick from it. Of course the main thing which makes up size is genetics and it’s basically a lottery on your size.