It seems that there is a ready middle ground here if folks want to choose it. More on that in a minute.
I’m not a mod, nor a frequent poster but have been a lurker/site member for over a year so. Like many others, I have enjoyed and learned from DLD’s posts. Sometimes they are a little verbose and over-exuberant for my taste, but that’s part of his personality. With it comes lots of positives —encouragement, repsonsiveness and perhaps most importantly, some killer techniques.
Likewise, Thunder, along with other forum leaders, has labored long and hard to establish a quality site that is based on the principles of openness, fairness and free of bias. He has resisted back of the magazine gimmicks and ads, all in the interest of bringing legitimacy to PE. So I understand his concern, and perhaps the concerns of other mods, that the site could be used as a marketing tool as has been the case with other PE sites.
It seems reasonable to allow DLD to keep moderator position, but under the stipulation that he not misuse the position to directly market his pay site (I don’t think he deliberately has, though a collective reading of his recent posts does provide quite a bit of detail about the new site — at least more than is necessary to alert the PE public of its existence).
We do have a precedent, if one pauses to think about it. Thunder in a way markets Bib’s hangers (I’m a proud owner of one) through a link at the bottom of the page, yet Bib does not otherwise use the forum to promote them. He provides advice freely to Bib hangers, non-Bib hangers, and non-hangers alike and is very careful in providing advice and letting others draw their own conclusions without influencing them in a way to further any self-interest he might have in selling hangers. It’s a very delicate and tricky balance and I think and he and Thunder have managed it quite well.
I think the same approach could work with DLD, if he, Thunder and the mods were to consider it with clear eyes. We could then all continue to benefit from DLD’s advice and particpation, and in return he would promise greater discretion and sensitivty regarding any mention of his pay site.
What do others think?