Sophmoric: I hear you.
You posted your gains cause you convinced yourself you had some. Now you confess they were unearned?
Ok, I can understand that! However, the idea that commercial accounts on a not for profit site, listed gains to get more free subscribers seems a stretch, at this point still non profit after how many years? But then, I had no idea honest Internet host vendors would stoop to do such things? For my money, the very fact that this site has been around more than 12 years per “8-Ball” is a contradiction to it’s viability as a site that claims “penis growth” when none exist!
As to your “con-formant” gain reporting theory, maybe? But myself, as an example, I didn’t post my gains on my excel schedule using my best but rather my lowest number for measurement day (I do this weekly), sort of telling myself I will have those gains next week if they are there and besides I hadn’t quite achieved that best number every time anyways.Furthermore, I had no intention of promoting / posting those numbers on “Thunders” site. Until one day I decided, why not? So I did, in January 2011 using my data from my excel schedule that I downloaded from Thunders. It seemed the right thing to do, since I had pretty fair gains and I kept reading how this type of stuff motivated the other guys. It did for me, when I reviewed thunder’s data to find a guy that had my same size as my next week’s goal.( I needed the volume numbers, to post to my log) The cylinder formula I looked upon the Internet, just didn’t get the same results for some reason, so I went with Thunders volume postings.?
Could there also be the possibility that members or non-members did not have gains so they don’t post their data.thus skewing the results to the positive?Certainly! But just like Government economic reports, “what else do we have to use?” So we must survey the Thunders data, accept them as fact & but verify,test the validity of the numbers. Do Government statistics “lie”, not necessarily they ‘redefine” their results. So use the “Thunder data”, I say, it’s the best we have! If someone can shoot bullet holes into the findings with competent statistics, then I surrender to their awesomeness! But skewing the averages by a fraction of “mm“‘s isn’t the same as reaching the conclusion that 2 inch gains are “outliers” not to be believed.
Meanwhile I keep PE- ing, cause my wife says, “I haven’t noticed you grew oh soooo much,” to which I replied, “well then I have more work to do then! Don’t I?” Then after 3 weeks of no gains, last week I enjoyed another growth, happy I made my first updates to my personal data on Thunders since 12/31/10. Fortunately also, today that girth gain was still there.. On Tuesday.. As measured on Friday! So it wasn’t my imagination yahoo! :>)
Two-Fist-er..
“Always with the negative waves “Moriarty” why can’t you say something righteous & hopeful for a change”.Kelly Heroes!