;””Does this mean that female orgasm pretty much depend on a female’s rating of your genes, more than on penis size maybe?
Does penis size play a big role in a female’s evaluation of your genes, i.e. big dick, high genes?””’
Yes in my opinion the female orgasm is entirely dependent on how strong of genes she is likely to get from an encounter. In fact its just been discovered that if women dont’ orgasm they cannot get pregnant. Some researchers put a camera in a womans vagina during intercourse and saw something that amazed them, when she orgasms a tiny previously unknown tiny organ scoops cum out of her vagina and into the uterous area. Women cannot conciously feel it and it only goes into action during orgasm. Keep in mind all of us have many many things to offer in our genetics, and even the best looking people out there even have problems. Example one of the most famous american movie stars renouned for his looks, who I can’t find his damn name, is colourblind. And also keep in mind you don’t see the test of how good the sperm is until its competing against other mens sperm. And in that competition, only the very strongest of sperm have a chance, whereas in monogamy you dont’ see that, and sometimes a weak sperm can just fluke its way in… with billions of killer sperm the chances of a non almost perfect sperm making it are essentialy nothing. Also note that what is of genetic value is relative. A woman might come from a family who is very tall but has skin problems for example, she might be highly attracted to a man who is not otherwise to attractive but has very beautiful healthy skin. I’m not sure what role a big dick plays in an evaluation of genes. It seems to be a huge display of sexual prowess though, and of hormonal health. Remember a lot of how big it is is how healthy it is. Judging from how much women focus on it I’d say its a large part of a genetic ‘scan’, which is probably one reason humans’ are so large in that area relative to most primates. Women will tell you they would rather have a nice hard cock then a large soft one though, so there is more factors then pure size to.
”’The Evolution of Desire by David M. Buss
The Anatomy of Love by Helen Fisher
Amazon has both. Also recommended by others is The Mating Mind by Geoffrey Miller. Haven’t read that one yet personally.”””””
Wow!!!!!!! nice rakishly I was just reading about those books and some related ones on amazon.com. I am hoping they will be available in my cities libraries, I will go and read them all tomorrow. My libraries search tool for books is currently down unfortunately, but I will know soon enough which ones they have and which ones they dont’. I wanted to share with you guys one of the reviews which sums up the way I’m thinking about this perfectly:
As I biologist, I am constantly frustrated by the unscientific (and often ultra-philisophical) interpretation that goes on when considering humanity, and particularly love. This book took the extreme interest that exists about human sexuality and love, and places them in a scientific light, without necissarily demonizing or undermining the amazing feelings that go along with love; Fisher simply explains the science behind these amazingly rich and powerful feelings in an attempt to better know ourselves.
Another review I found especially interesting had this conjecture:
Buss never mentions that humans have a unique, difficult-to-explain anatomical feature: a huge cerebral cortex. This brain area enables us to think in abstractions, use language, and, perhaps most important for sexual strategies, to lie to each other. Buss sometimes mentions lying as a sexual strategy, and even notes the "evolutionary arms race" of men and women deceiving each other, and catching each others’ deception. But he never connects the dots that sexual lying (and catching sexual lies) may have driven our ancestors to evolve huge brains.
I would love to talk with the guy who wrote this review ‘Thomas David Kehoe’ http://www.amaz on.com/exec/obi … 3733629-3094238