AgentD66,
>What can i hypothetically expect? <
A small amount of gain from lig stretch. More gain will have to come from tunica stretch. Work some at lower angles, but soon you will need to work at upper angles.
Conan,
Great potential. You should hit the lower angles consistantly.
dongers, Johan
>A few questions: given my low LOT should I not bother with btc and start hanging immediately straight out or ots? - so as to hit the tunica.<
You have some potential in the ligs, but you are correct. Generally hit the upper angles.
>Also with regard to internal cock.. Am I right in saying that a low LOT is consistent with relatively little cock to ‘pull out’? It is just that feeling back from where my dick leaves my body to my anus I can feel several inches of plump penis tissue. Is this not internal dick? and if it is why exactly does a low LOT mean I can not pull it out?<
Hmmm. I cannot get my mind to explain this in another way. A low LOT does not mean that you cannot stretch internal tunica. OK? It means that the ligs are not a factor in holding in internal penis. Think of it as rolling up a rope. With high tight ligs, there is internal penis which is curved up to exit at a higher point. Lengthening the ligs allows the exit point to lower, and internal penis to come out further.
Also, at an LOT of 7:00, you do have some internal potential. If you can feel a lot of internal penis, try the lower angles for a while and record the results.
>Are we sure that LOT is not simply related to strength of the PC muscle? The stronger the PC the lower the angle at which you are able to effect a tug? <
Your theory is along the correct lines. But the amount of length of the penis that can be ‘tugged back’ by the PC is not that great. I suppose there could be a small amount of error based on differing strengths of the PC. But I doubt it could account for more than 30 minutes of error on the LOT scale. In fact, I would say 30 minutes would be a whole lot of error. Maybe closer to 15 minutes.
In fact, what you are saying is the EXACT reason for the varying strengths of tugback at different angles. When guys say that they “get a strong tugback at 9:00, and little at 8:00, it is the last portion of the flex of the PC that gives that slight tugback, loosening the ligs grasp enough to feel a little something. LOT is never going to be exact, but you can see from the tables that is can be exact enough to draw conclusions.
Further, the correlations are not 100%, but they are very highly negatively correlated for the high ‘gains per month’ PEers. The correlation between gains and LOT is POSITIVE for the low ‘gains per month’ PEers which includes Johan. It appears your stats are dead on for the conclusions drawn.
>A strong PC muscle could also be implicated in gains being tough…<
I don’t think so. The only reason that a strong PC could effect gains is in flexing or not. If the PC is not flexed, it should make no difference, right? As with the DLD blasters, assuming a stretch below the LOT, when you flex the PC, the tunica is tugged back, and the ligs should receive less of the stress. If you reverse kegal, assuming a stretch below the LOT, the tunica should be expressed, and the ligs receive more stress.
The PC is muscle, and we are stretching collagenous tissues.
Bigger