Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Size Reality Check

Originally Posted by newyorktexan
I plugged another sleeve of Ritz that I measured as closer to 6.75” into on of the size calculators:

LENGTH
6.75
96.69% In a room of 1000 guys, 33 would be bigger than you.
GIRTH
6
99.69% In a room of 1000 guys, 3 would be bigger than you.
FLACCID (I couldn’t get flaccid crackers….)
Your volume is about 285.19 ml / 9.64 fl oz (US), which is 2 times more voluminous than the average.
That makes you bigger than 99.69% of guys. In a room of 1000 guys, 3 would be bigger than you.

Enough cracker comparisons, but an interesting perspective. I suspect if you put a sleeve of Ritz in a woman’s hands she’s say “hold on now, that’s huge.”

However,
1) the 6.75 would be NBPEL for the crackers. But you enter BPEL in calcsd
2) the western average is more correct. Which leads to 91,8%. We want to have a realistic depiction of where we stand

Besides that, your example is quite catchy and helpful :-)


[before PE] Start BPFSL: 17.6cm (6.93 inches) start BPEL: 16.7cm (6.57 inches)

[decon until 21.08.22] latest BFPSL: 21,2cm (8,35 inches) latest BPEL: 19,1cm (7,52 inches)

Click here to see my amazing US progress report (always updated!Kyrpa's methodology) ;-)

Originally Posted by CBateman
Besides that, your example is quite catchy and helpful :-)

Agreed

Originally Posted by CBateman
However,
1) the 6.75 would be NBPEL for the crackers. But you enter BPEL in calcsd
2) the western average is more correct. Which leads to 91,8%. We want to have a realistic depiction of where we stand

Besides that, your example is quite catchy and helpful :-)

In the NSFW members progress section I actually did a “cracker pressed” comparison to myself. :) Granted I couldn’t press too hard!

Originally Posted by Edubrsurf
I’m at a 7x5.5 and it always looks small to me, that’s a great pov

Cock twins!, but I measure > 5.75 near the base, and it still looks small from my perspective, even though my gf cannot close an “OK sign” around it.


2013-01 6.50 x 4.75 || 2013-03 6.75 x 4.75 || 2013-07 7.00 x 5.25 || 2013-12 7.00 x 5.50

Cracker Update

I happened to open a new box of Ritz, in a larger format apparently….7” in length on that measured stack. So…the cracker test apparently depends on your package…so to speak. Still same +/- 6” around. Still a useful reality check.

Let’s do pringles now. 😂

Originally Posted by remington
Let’s do pringles now. 😂

Only if you use an elliptical tube to pump?

I always wondered how some guys with relatively average sized units were so comfortable sending “dick pics” out… turns out they’re really good at “angles.” Kind of like the girl on the dating app who seemed pretty hot but what she really was a master of were filtered selfies.

You hear about these 8-9inchers but we all know people can’t spatially or dimensionally measure on a whim worth a damn.

This cracker test is a good example of that it seems!


If you're ever considering a surgical (or non-surgical) route for penis enlargement:

PhalloBoards: A Forum Devoted to Penis Enlargement Surgery & Non-Surgical Procedures

Originally Posted by 5.5Squared
Yep. I read through that one from time to time. I also visit calcSD - Full Penis Size Percentile Calculator after every cycle to see how I compare.

Great site, that really puts things into perspective. Amazing how many of us probably fall into that above average/abnormally large category and always considered ourselves below average.


Start date: 10/06/2021, NBPEL: 6in, MEG: 5in

UPDATE: 5/28/2022, NPBEL: 6.8in, MEG:5.25

Originally Posted by djvynz
Great site, that really puts things into perspective. Amazing how many of us probably fall into that above average/abnormally large category and always considered ourselves below average.

I agree, this is amazing. When you’re in the top 0.5% in terms of volume, you can cut yourself some slack!

Size Calculator

I agree it’s rather uplifting to see one’s stats calculate to abnormally large and macropenis! Maybe it will eat Tokyo…. :) Yet we “here” all know these stats could be slightly off, but they are self-affirming!

According to the calculator mine should have its own zip code


Starting: (3/1/20) BPFSL 6.75" NBPEL 6.5" MSEG 4.9"

Now: BPFSL 7.5" NBPEL 7.0" MSEG 5.0"

Goal 8" NBPEL 6" MSEG

Originally Posted by rvega
Cock twins!, but I measure > 5.75 near the base, and it still looks small from my perspective, even though my gf cannot close an “OK sign” around it.

If your hand/fingers can’t wrap around the cock, its a damn big cock, period! How it looks and how it feels are two completely different things. Sex is all about the feels; some people might be lucky and can “look” themselves to orgasm, but then the size of a penis has nothing to do with that ability…


Starting length, Spring 2003: bpel 6 3/8", bpfsl ~6 1/2", flaccid ~3-4" (never measured flaccid stretched or hanging flaccid; starting girth was probably ~5"-5 1/4")

Summer 2004: bpel 7 7/8", bpfsl 8 1/8", flaccid ~4", erect girth 5.3"

Spring 2018: bpel 7 1/4", bpfsl 7 5/8", erect girth 5 1/8"; Spring 2020: bpel 7 3/4", bpfsl 8", erect girth 5 3/8". Current - August 2021: bpel 7 3/4", bpfsl 8", erect girth 5 1/4"

Originally Posted by CBateman
However,
1) the 6.75 would be NBPEL for the crackers. But you enter BPEL in calcsd
2) the western average is more correct. Which leads to 91,8%. We want to have a realistic depiction of where we stand

Besides that, your example is quite catchy and helpful :-)

Bumping for #2 above. Remember to use ‘western average’ on calcsd. Makes things a bit more challenging.


Retired: NO PMs; BPEL: 5.5" --> 7.9" ; BPFSL: ~5.6" --> 8.5"

Progress log summary: Hanging with FIRe

"Going hard, fast and heavy is all against the scientific knowledge of tissue expansion or elongation." - Kyrpa

That calculator is straight BS. I’m not even remotely above average with my roughly 5 nbel 6 bpel x 5 eg penis. In fact most people would say I’m on the smaller side

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 PM.