The (statistical) Truth About Cock Size

Another point to make when reading this thread. Many of us go online and look at the “amateur” porn sites. Wow every single guy seems to be hung. If you were average or smaller than average, would you be real excited to post your homemade videos online? Well no. So even the amateur sites are not not a real indication of what is out there. Only the guys that KNOW they are large will usually post their penis on the net. Same goes for the studies that have been done. When an ad is placed that a PENIS SIZE study is being done, who will run to go be measured.the larger than average guys. The only way they could get a true average study would be to stand on a street corner and pull every guy in that walks by, without saying one word about what it was for. If you tell them it was to measure their penis.the guys who felt they were average to small would refuse. This again throws off the data, making the current study data slightly higher than average in my opinion.

I doubt most of videos on ‘amateur porn sites’ are played by amateur actors.

Damn this kind of goes to show you confidence has alot of do with getting laid.

Exactly Dan.and here we are working like mad to squeeze out a 1/2” more in length or girth, even though many of us are probably married with a wife that is very content with what we offer. LOL The male mind and ego relating to our little buddy down there is amazing. I am worrying more about it at 40yo then I ever did at a teenager.go figure.

I know this has been done before but thought it was time for an update.

I spent some time with the splendid database we have with members stating their own values and gains and have come the the following conslusion.

Avarage starting values:
BPEL: 6.40” (16.3 cm)
EG: 5.05” (12.8 cm)
FL: 4.05” (10.3 cm)
FG: 3.99” (10.1 cm)

I must say that I am a little surprised and these values are quite a bit higher than the official tests I have read.

Ok, so what next. Of course what the avarage measures are of latest stated values after PE. No matter how long people have been doing PE, I just took the latest stated value. If there is no progress or only one entry, I still took this.

Average values after PE:
BPEL: 6.70” (17.0 cm)
EG: 5.18” (13.2 cm)
FL: 4.31” (10.9 cm)
FG: 4.15” (10.5 cm)

So the average length gain is 0.3” (0.7 cm), average girth gain is 0.13” (0.33 cm), average flaccid length gain is 0.26” (0.6 cm) and average flaccid girth gain is 0.16” (0.4 cm).

I do not wish to discourage you guys but it seems like it is more difficult to gain in size than most people believe and big gains are rare.

There are 4512 entries for BPEL, 4499 for EG, 2836 for FL and 2666 for FG. Definitely enough for statistical proof (usually 1000 entries will do).

There are rather many people with 8” BPEL than I thought. 368 which means 8.2%.
It is very rare with BPEL of 9” and above. Only 67 entries which means 1.5% and also doubt some of these values.

I am very surprised to see that there are 539 entries with 6” EG (12.0%) and more and 44 entries with 7” EG and more (0.98%)! I mean, that is really huge!

More encouraging is that 590 members of this forum have gained more than 1” (2.54 cm) in BPEL, 87 more than 2” (5.08 cm) and 9 members more than 3” (7.62 cm).

140 members have gained more than 1” (2.54 cm) in EG and 24 more than 2” (5.08 cm).

I didn’t take the trouble to draw graphs as this has been done before but can of course if someone is interested.

Anything else you wish to know? ;)

But of course, you’re talking about 8.2% of the people who filled out their stats. As we all know, this doesn’t mean that is going to carry over to 8.2% of members here. It contains a self selecting group of guys with units more likely to be larger than average. Hence the average starting BPEL is skewed higher. Now, if the data also included 8.2% of guys with BPEL 4.8 and lower.it would be an indicator of normality. I think you’ll find the significance of the skew present in the disparity between the “normal distribution”, which isn’t even normal in any size study, and this distribution.

Majoriteten får antagligen inga super resultat pga de inte “skräddarsyr” sina egna rutiner utan bara följer “Newbie routine”.

I belive that The majority of people here at Thunders does not make their own routines,they just follow the Newbie routine and routines that have already been made by other members. As soon as I began gathering knowledge about my own penis and what “works for me” I started to gain very good.

You know what would be nice. If filling in your penis size was a required field to join Thundersplace. Imagine the data we could collect then!

i have one question about these size surveys. how do these guys maintain 10 EQ when there are doctors and nurses watching them

Jelqfanatic, when you have time give a read to the Forum Guidelines - the section about grammar, spelling and capitalization. Thanks in advance.

fake data

But what evidence do you have for that statement? It may be the case you are correct, or that PE’ers on average are larger than the normal population. Or the people filling in the data could be doing it in a malicious or inaccurate way, either way I don’t see how you prove any of this beyond speculating.

The guy is simply detailing what the stats show, we can speculate on the results and look at the underlying reasons, but I don’t think we can draw from that any definite conclusions without knowing the details of everyone who added data.

Good work, Steelfire!
I wish to note that the early abandon rate among registered TP members is around 80%, according to the data in the database. The average gains are averages over all data, even single entries (as Steelfire said), so they contain also the inconsistent and voyager members. That’s why they are so low values.
I wanted to make this clarification for not discouraging the consistent members, which have far better gain expectancies.

/forum/showthread.php?t=106676

I think I should make another calculation and leave out members who have not submitted at least two entries. I’ll do that later today.