You disagreed with my reasoning yet re-stated my three requirements in this paragraph.Your “Dedication and time”= my “Actively worked at it for 2 years or more”.
Your “skill and knowledge” = my “did not over train” and “adjusted their workout.”
I agree that a certain physiology is required. I made a wild guess that 50% of men may have the physiology to gain 3 inches. I never claimed to have made any kind of analysis, and plainly stated that it is just a suspicion.
I didn’t clarify that I meant 3 inches or more to be “sky is the limit”. I don’t think a 20” penis is possible, (at least one that still works). If we add 3” to the average length, we wind up with a really, really big penis at around 8-9 inches. If we add 3” to someone who started already really big, say at 9”, then we end up with the Arnold Schrwartzenegers and Lance Armstrongs at 12 inches. But that would mean someone dedicated enough to pursue it for 2-6 years when already gigantic.
My question is, just how many men actually have been actively PE-ing for 10 years or more and have done it the way you and I both describe in terms of your “skill and knowledge” or my “not over training” and “adjusting their workout.”? Most simply stop actively PE-ing at some point for a variety of reasons.
This argument as to if infinite gains are possible has been discussed by many guys other than you and me Ruz. My guess, (and yes it is without foundation), is that many more guys could gain 3” or more if they dedicated the time and worked smart according to the current state of the art. You seem to say that percentage is probably much less, and you may be right.
I merely brought it up here to see if any statistics guys could find a way to add your and my criteria to the analysis.
I’m with Ruz on this one. The idea that 3 inch gains are ever going to be anything more than a freak occurrence seems to require a delicate combination of improbable events.
Further muddying the waters of our understanding, nobody, to my knowledge, has ever quantified the factors of:
A) age and the possibility of gains attributed to PE being due in fact to natural genital growth
B) the resolution of illness or disease conditions leading to ED
In the PE realm, there are no scientific studies that are trustworthy because all of them are funded by pill hawkers, extender schlockers, and wiener slicers. Not only are we left with mostly anecdotal and self-reported data from sites like this one, but we don’t even have the rigor of even the sloppiest experimenters in mainstream medical research.
Maybe half the gains reported are due to curing ED or impairment or in some fashion improving EQ. How would we know? Better question, how would the participants even know? There may be some with obvious cases, they’re symptomatic or they realize they have a problem. And maybe there’s a lot who don’t. We don’t know, either, because we don’t have enough baseline data to say that.
4/2008 Bpel 6.50, Beg 5.5, Mseg 4.9
6/2008 Bpel 6.75, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1
9/2008 Bpel 7.00, Beg 5.5, Mseg 5.1
