@Behemoth: Thank you for the advice, I will make sure I do that. When I am writing forum posts/emails sometimes I do get a little too “stream of consciousness” in my writing. I have a good memory for these kinds of facts and I tend to just start regurgitating. Stream of consciousness writing and someone with English as a second language trying to read it does indeed sound very tough and fills my head with the image of a foreigner trying to read Ulysses or some of Kurt Vonnegut’s books, like Breakfast of Champions (I think the pictures in that might even make it harder) - funny, but not pretty. ;) So I guess I’m saying I’ll make sure to break things up!
@Marinera: Totally missed that post! That was a great article/study. I always just figured creep was the viscoelastic property responsible for the most efficient plastic deformation of tissue because it causes the tissue to lengthen more and more over time, but with no real proof. Glad I know how important stress relaxation is now!
Being that both extenders and hanging are creep-based methods of lengthening, how do you think static progressive splinting can be applied to PE to maximize stress relaxation and, as this is the fastest way to soften tissue and achieve end-range lengthening and be able to move on to a further end-range (as the study states), maximize total end-range time? That traction device I saw on this site that uses the big threaded you to periodically apply incrementally increased traction and hold the penis at greater and greater lengths, allowing for stress relaxation to take place at each level of stretch followed by further lengthening of the end-range stretch works in the same fashion as a static progressive splint. I have seen extenders that only use threaded arms without the spring-loaded hydraulics as well. The shitty thing about trying to create a static progressive splint for your penis is that, so far, nobody has come up with a way to keep the penis under traction 24/7 (for circulation reasons) as you can with a splint designed to apply torque to a joint, and, therefore, the tissues have to be periodically allowed to shorten and then they must be re-stretched.
So, could someone - preferably an engineer that is also a urologist and genius - please get on building something like this? ;)
Also, after viewing those results I would like to know quantitatively how much faster stretch relaxation techniques work as compared to creep-based methods because I noticed that some of the creep-based techniques examined outperformed other stretch relaxation-based techniques aside from static progressive splinting. If, when using a similar apparatus, the difference is marginal then perhaps a stress relaxation-based PE system/device would not be too much of an upgrade over our creep-based extenders and hangers. And stress relaxation certainly requires a great deal more work and attention as you must progressively increase the stretch length incrementally rather than just letting the device increase it for you constantly over time as is the case with creep-based systems.
@Ironaddict: Not very much tension is a bit of a generalization as the degree of tension is relative to a person’s experience and the conditioning/toughness of their penile tissues. I would define the proper tension as JUST enough tension to breach the threshold for plastic-deformation, as I’ve said before. The minimum amount of stress to achieve this. Now, as you deform your connective tissue and the other tissues of the penis, they will strengthen (some strengthening/toughening is unavoidable with current PE protocols, perhaps every possible protocol) and more stress will be required to stretch them to a length that produces plastic deformation. So, at some point, the absolute force being applied might be considerable, but it will only create enough tissue strain to just breach the plastic deformation threshold because of increased tissue strength.
@Plaidshirt: I pumped at the beginning of my recent dedicated approach to PE and had to stop because of how quickly I began gaining girth - I was after length first in my long-term PE plan and I honestly can’t say why I bought a pump with those specific goals, it was an impulse buy. Also, most of those gains I achieved stuck around and appear to be permanent, even mid-shaft which is usually not affected by hanging, my current approach.
The pump I used was the Size Matters Penis Pumping Kit (the Advanced model). It has a gauge, a pistol-grip hand pump (like a brake bleeder or the Kaplan), a quick release button, a shitty leather adjustable cock ring, and a 9 (and some change) inch X 2.25 inch hardened acrylic cylinder which I took down to between -6 and -7 bars Hg of vacuum pressure eventually and had no tube integrity problems, I mean there was not even an indication that such a thing might ever happen at those pressures - no cracks, straining sounds, nothing. I maxed out the length pretty quickly under vacuum but never even got close to the sides (my cock was 4.875 inches in girth when I started and got to 5.25 inches at the end of my pumping run about a month later), so unless you got a coke can it should work well for girth for a long while. It is, I would say, comparable to the Kaplan Pump, though I never used the Kaplan, but did not come with any instructions (I was told by the sex shop lady that the Kaplan has detailed instructions). All the instructions you should need, however, are on this site! :) It was around 100 dollars, also much cheaper than the Kaplan (and the cylinder is bigger).
And I want to go on the record again saying that I believe pumping is an effective method for permanently increasing girth both in theory and in practice. Like lengthening connective tissue, expanding connective tissue just requires that it be expanded just past the threshold for plastic deformation, this expansion can be generated by several different methods, and pumping should work towards that end in theory. Clamping may be even more effective, most people think so and I’ve never tried it, but I believe pumping works well too.