Originally Posted by Serenity73
I can’t figure out what exactly it is you’re arguing is the difference between water and air then. The OP presents it as if there’s a resistance to expansion. As long as a partial vacuum is maintained, this is not true - regardless of the medium.
Correct, let me perhaps clarify the process in pumping with water.
First, creating a partial vacuum at a given level in a completely water-filled system produces very little change in the water’s density. That is, not much room is created for the penis to expand into - room that comes from the expansion and compression of the medium that is. So for every unit of water evacuated the penis must expand about one unit. With air, one must evacuate much more air to create the same initial expansion force because air is expandable. This means that the penis can expand a great deal more before the pressure equalizes and an equilibrium is reached. (So Marinera, you are right here, but it’s not really a good thing)
This slow, constant, and greater total expansion in air is what leads to higher fluid buildup as fluid inflow is much harder to achieve than blood inflow. The almost 1:1 evacuation:expansion ratio with water also gives the pumper much more control to expand primarily the tunica. That is, you pump up to a fully erect state, when the tunica tissues relax viscoelastically you evacuate water again as there will be less resistance to blood inflow at that point. Doing this, you ensure more of the total expansion is from tunica expansion rather than fluid retention. You cannot follow this modality with air because it is compressible/expandable.
So just like all other forms of PE we should concentrate on achieving the desired amount of stretch in our target tissues rather than the negative pressure generated. I mean, don’t get me wrong, pressure is useful from a safety standpoint, but one of the main points I was trying to make is that it is not the end-all, be-all measurement in pumping and the expansion we get from it.