Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Everything about Size

123

Originally Posted by firegoat
In the ‘old days’ Thunder’s Place was all about the 8” x 6” ‘Holy Grail’ penis. The ‘ideal size’ idea came from my signature line, which I’ve had for years - and the more it gets discussed the more folk agree with the size I came up with. It is a size which is on the larger size for most women - still ‘doable’ for tight girls, but big enough for women with more capacious vaginas, and generally filling for the majority of average females.

It’s enough to satisfy our desire for an undeniably big penis compared with most of our friends and enough for our girlfriend, partner or wife to be able to brag about.
It’s impressive enough for one night stand confidence. It’s more likely to get a mental response of ‘I want that in me’ than a ‘meh’ or ‘looks painful’ mental response from most women.

It’s suckable without extreme jaw ache. It shouldn’t cause too much soreness for most girls so sex the next day is likely. Anal may still be on the cards with some folk. ‘Quickie’ sex may not be feasible with most women, but neither is a very long warm up period and possibly the need for extra lube that much larger sizes often need.

That’s my rationale for the size in my signature line. Everyone is of course free to choose their size ideal and justify it to themselves however they want. And of course if you have a permanent partner that may well dictate the ideal. But at the end of the day we PE for ourselves not anyone else, so if you prefer the ‘Holy Grail’ to the ideal, then go for it!

What about if you’re uncut, surely you can get away with more since there’s not as much friction and you don’t need lube?


Start » 5.90 NBP

This is from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Not people who produce objective research in the social sciences—these are people with an ax to grind.


Why the Smithsonian? Because you could walk around it for a week and not see the whole thing.

Originally Posted by The Smithsonian
This is from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Not people who produce objective research in the social sciences—these are people with an ax to grind.

That doesn’t change anything about it because of one simple thing, called oxytocin, which is called the pair bonding hormone and gets weaker with each new partner so the study is still very valid


Start » 5.90 NBP

Originally Posted by darkjoe
That doesn’t change anything about it because of one simple thing, called oxytocin, which is called the pair bonding hormone and gets weaker with each new partner so the study is still very valid

Maybe the study is valid. Maybe.

But one study never adds up to a settled issue. Who did the study? Was it well constructed? Who paid for it? Was it published in a reputable journal? Was it properly peer reviewed? Are they drawing relevant conclusions from their results? Have the results been reproduced? Where does it sit in the context of other studies on the same subject?

I’m not qualified to assess these things—I don’t think you are either—so I have to look at where I’m hearing about it. In this case, it’s the Heritage Foundation—a super-conservative think tank with a pro-“family values” and anti-science agenda. It took me one Google search to find them promoting bad science to advance a political agenda.

So given the source, I am not going to draw conclusions about how people should lead their sex lives from this, and neither should you.


Why the Smithsonian? Because you could walk around it for a week and not see the whole thing.

Originally Posted by darkjoe

What about if you’re uncut, surely you can get away with more since there’s not as much friction and you don’t need lube?

It’s still the same length and girth to put in a vagina, mouth or anus of ‘x’ size. It’s not going to make any real difference.


firegoat is fully RETIRED from Thundersplace.

All injuries happen from "too much", or "too much, too soon" or "doing the exercise incorrectly".

Heat makes the difference between gaining quickly or slowly for some guys, or between gaining slowly instead of not at all for others. The ideal penis size is 7.6" BPEL x 5.6" Mid Girth. Basics.... firegoat roll How to use the Search button for best results

Originally Posted by firegoat
In the ‘old days’ Thunder’s Place was all about the 8” x 6” ‘Holy Grail’ penis. The ‘ideal size’ idea came from my signature line, which I’ve had for years - and the more it gets discussed the more folk agree with the size I came up with. It is a size which is on the larger size for most women - still ‘doable’ for tight girls, but big enough for women with more capacious vaginas, and generally filling for the majority of average females.

It’s enough to satisfy our desire for an undeniably big penis compared with most of our friends and enough for our girlfriend, partner or wife to be able to brag about.
It’s impressive enough for one night stand confidence. It’s more likely to get a mental response of ‘I want that in me’ than a ‘meh’ or ‘looks painful’ mental response from most women.

It’s suckable without extreme jaw ache. It shouldn’t cause too much soreness for most girls so sex the next day is likely. Anal may still be on the cards with some folk. ‘Quickie’ sex may not be feasible with most women, but neither is a very long warm up period and possibly the need for extra lube that much larger sizes often need.

That’s my rationale for the size in my signature line. Everyone is of course free to choose their size ideal and justify it to themselves however they want. And of course if you have a permanent partner that may well dictate the ideal. But at the end of the day we PE for ourselves not anyone else, so if you prefer the ‘Holy Grail’ to the ideal, then go for it!

From personal experience, I think that is a good rationale. It looks like a very good goal. I have to deal with soreness with some frequency, but I’m not sure if it is size-related. I can’t comment on the anal part. I have done it a few times only, if the woman asks, which is rare. It isn’t very good for me. I think I haven’t done it properly yet. I’m not really curious about it either.
I would just add that a 100% EQ is mandatory. That should be included in every PE plan. I think that if effectiveness in sex is one of the goals, then every % of EQ that you waste is damaging the impact that your size has (beyond your size being actually smaller with lower EQ).


(09/2017): 7.3" BPEL x 6.0" MSEG (start)

(09/2021): 7.8" BPEL x 6.9" MSEG

Originally Posted by batman_kX8V4Sk

From personal experience, I think that is a good rationale. It looks like a very good goal. I have to deal with soreness with some frequency, but I’m not sure if it is size-related. I can’t comment on the anal part. I have done it a few times only, if the woman asks, which is rare. It isn’t very good for me. I think I haven’t done it properly yet. I’m not really curious about it either.

I would just add that a 100% EQ is mandatory. That should be included in every PE plan. I think that if effectiveness in sex is one of the goals, then every % of EQ that you waste is damaging the impact that your size has (beyond your size being actually smaller with lower EQ).

Smart man!


Started 7.75x5.75

Currently: 9.75bpX6.75eg My Picture Thread

Goal:10.0bpX7.25mseg Building a thicker unit, click by click, pump by pump, jelq by jelq!

Well, I’ve done my own research and have come to the conclusion that I like sluts.

Here is a poem about them … .

Privacy info: Clicking on this image will enable content from www.youtube.com. Privacy friendly version via Piped.
Top
123

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27 PM.