Considering getting the frenulum removed and possibly becoming cut

mizrahi,
I dont know what you are up to but you appear to set things out of context like the WHO recommendations on circumscision. Which are basicly only published for high risk HIV countrys..
You talk about it beeing a free decsision but push a circumcision propaganda site that is out to influence parents with unsusbtituated fears(the guy is ripped apart all over the web for his CIRCUMCISON FETISH,,,,Search for it)..

So how do you know how it is to have sex with an intact foreskin? How can you know the difference? No peer reviewed study will explain that to you. (Here is a study with experiences of 5000 people!!! : Male circumcision leads to a bad sex life). Basicly you are clueless on what you are missing out! YOU cant know it.

There is no risk to having a foreskin in europe or america. OBVIOUSLY!
NO SANE doctor recommends circumcision to a healthy foreskin in germany cause there is no risk to it cutting a piece of healthy skin full of nerve endings that create pleasure and protect the glans.
Cutting healthy foreskin is a cult-ural thing primitive tribes and religious cults do.

http://www.circ … rg/position.htm

2012 SWEDISH PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY
Circumcision of young boys for religious and non-medical reasons ought to be banned in Sweden. "We consider it to be an assault on these boys," said Staffan Janson, chairman of the committee for ethical issues and childrens’ rights. Children are unable to form a decision in the matter. Circumcision is an attack on boys’ integrity. "It’s such a complicated and difficult question, but even so, we’ve decided that this is a procedure to be done away with," Janson said."It's a mutilation of a child unable to decide for himself."

2010 ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS
"Ethical and human rights concerns have been raised regarding elective infant male circumcision because it is recognized that the foreskin has a functional role, the operation is non-therapeutic and the infant is unable to consent. After reviewing the currently available evidence, the RACP believes that the frequency of diseases modifiable by circumcision, the level of protection offered by circumcision and the complication rates of circumcision do not warrant routine infant circumcision in Australia and New Zealand."
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) is a not-for-profit professional organisation responsible for training, education, and representing over 14,600 physicians and paediatricians and 6,600 trainees in 25 medical specialties in Australia and New Zealand.

"The foreskin has two main functions. Firstly it exists to protect the glans penis. Secondly the foreskin is a primary sensory part of the penis, containing some of the most sensitive areas of the penis."

Well I rather belief sane western people instead of religious cults and primitive tribesmen.
I know I cant convert you cause you have idiological interest in it but maybe someone else gets some enlightement on this issue.

Look dickerschwanz,

First I don’t know what your play on my screen name means or if it was some sort of ridiculous typo, but you are clearly devolving into another one of your rants. You say you don’t know what I’m up to, but I keep clearly spelling it out for you. I’m sorry that a majority of medical professionals and scientists have given numerous pieces of evidence that circumcision has benefits and is quite sane.

In fact, if you actually read the primary scientific article for which you link to some review by Nordic science, the paper is extremely weak. First they are comparing 113 circumcised vs. THOUSANDS of uncircumcised men in a country where circumcision is rare, and they still couldn’t even draw conclusions from the data so they had to make up a number of different restrictions in order to generate the conclusions they were looking for. What is hilarious (and of course science nordic didn’t point out) is that circumcised guys get laid MORE than uncircumcised guys according to the study. So chew on that…

Cutting a healthy foreskin is not just religious, but it is also very common in advanced medical societies like the US. Every urologist I know has circumcised their children. Do you know why? Because they pay for their Mercedes with all of the uncircumcised guys who come in with infections and other nasty stuff. Plus, like your study with “5000 people!!!” shows, circumcised guys get laid more than uncircumcised men, so parents who circumcise their children are doing them a favor ;)

In the end, circumcision is a choice. Certainly an uncircumcised man who is hygienic has only a very small increase in the risk of penile cancer etc. compared to a circumcised man, and they may experience more pleasure. But if you want to circumcise your child, you should know that it is in fact a sane decision and is not mutiliation.

My logic is, you were born with it so why would it need to be chopped off? Human evolution before human consciousness.

Quim

I found this site to satisfy my curiosity about frenulum tying -

If you scroll down there are a lot of before and after pics as well as what the procedure involves.

Regards
Fred

Quim

This is also worth a read Penis frenuloplasty, frenulum breve

Regards
Fred

The example he provided about frenuplasty looks great. I would like to have it like that, having it there but without having it pulling back at all.

Thanks Fred for sharing all this. Much appreciated.

Thank you all for your discussions guys, I am learning quite a lot. I am with Mr, weenie. The human body is a perfect machine and our anatomy is the result of many generations. Dicker is the only one who has showed up having perform sex and PE with and without foreskin, his thoughts regarding all this are a bit more valuable IMO. Let’s see if more people wants to add up something

Sounds like you have done your due diligence and will make the best decision for you. Good luck with evening going forward!

Well i have seen my father many times naked not that i wanted to but this is how we move in the house and we discuss everything so when i was younger i asked him about it because he is cut and im not and he said he didnt want to do something like this to me like his father did.Well i can understand now that i read this thread that if you have the choice dont do it (sorry for my bad english)

Ihavefaith,

If you are cut as a kid you cant know the difference. So even greater decision by your dad to stop this cruel ritual in the family.

Knowing the difference its easy for me to never let my kid get cut without a need.

Of course life isnt ruined then but I would say the intensity of feelings is considerably less and this results in a lack of connection to the pussy and woman IMO.

Its like burning half of your taste buds away.

This is what I originally saw as a foreskin without a frenulum and I wanted it to be similar. Not sure if this guy is genetically like that or what. My efforts didn’t result in this though.

xvideos.com/video7660639/dick_with_no_frenum

Also those pages are what I went off but i’d still recommend the frenuplasty if your doc has experience with it. Then you can get it lengthened as long as you like im guessing. My foreskin still automatically rolls back over the head, not sure how to make it stay back permanently yet. haha

That looks comfortable for hanging right? Like it is easy to keep it back. But many members has said that in the frenulum there are loads of nerves. Have you ever had anything done surgery speaking to your dick mrweenie?

Btw, below of you video there is a black skinny guy than has like a 10 or 11 inches long dick? That looks like abnormal

If you wash every day, then why are you worried about cleanliness? There is nothing unhygienic about having a foreskin.

Circumcision is not YOUR choice if it’s done to you as an infant or a young boy, is it?

If cut men in America get laid more often than uncut, it’s because women have been conditioned to prefer men with mutilated penises. If you’d grown up in a society where everyone had their ears cut off at birth you’d probably think ears looked pretty gross.

And except in the tiny percentage of boys who have phimosis, of course circumcision is mutilation. Unnecessarily cutting off parts of people is what mutilation *is*.

Tell me, where do you stand on female genital mutilation? I assume you oppose it. In which case why is it OK to cut off parts of boys’ sex organs but not those of girls?

It’s a barbaric practice and I hope one day we finally abandon it globally. The prevalence of ancient superstition in the Muslim world and outdated body-hatred and residual erotophobia in the USA makes this unlikely, sadly.

No I haven’t done anything else to it prior. Same sensation as before.

There are a lot of choices that parents make for their children in order to give them the best experience possible later in life. The difference between infant and adult circumcision is huge. Did you know there is scientific research demonstrating that the nerves lost from the foreskin redistribute in an infant? That does not occur in an adult, so waiting until they are old enough to make a choice is way worse.

You didn’t read the study either. It’s funny that all of you anti-circumcision pushers a) only spout the same old propaganda you can find with a simple Google search and b) misquote the actual research done (probably because you never bother to read the actual primary source). The study was done in Denmark, where 95% of men are uncircumcised. So this so called “conditioning” had nothing to do with circumcised men getting more action. In fact one could argue the opposite ;)

Female and male genitals are completely different. There is no comparison. If female genitals produced smegma and weren’t self cleaning organs, we could compare.

You probably aren’t from America, because here circumcision has very little to do with religion and more to do with medicine. Perhaps the body hatred is your own? Why else would you care so much about protecting people from something that 99% aren’t bothered by and maybe even prefer?