Kinsey's Penis Insertion Length Percentile Chart Non Black Women

Howdy yall,

Today I stumbled across something very interesting. Despite my constant Internet research I’d never seen this until I saw it on a bodybuilding. Com thread.

This is supposedly a chart of how much length a woman can accept vaginally and it seems like it may be fairly accurate by my experience.

By my watch, my 6.75” just touches my gf’s cervix, her height is 5’5”. According to the chart this sounds like it’s in the ballpark.

I just wanted to share this with the community and see what the boys at the forum thought.

Does this look accurate to you fellas?

Cheers!

EL 6.75”
MSEG 5.25”
FL 4.25”

Dry jelqs for the win!

Please note that this chart is almost certainly bogus

My wife is 6’2” and I feel as though I touch her cervix when I’m really hard.

The Kinsey Insitute themselves link this in their FAQ on vagina size

http://humrep.o xfordjournals.o … 8.full.pdf+html

I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if that’s fabricated, with only a table there is no reliable source. Googling on the table headers brings nothing useful.

But what would be the motive to fabricate such a thing?

An attention whore and or asshole would fabricate such a thing.

There is a chart out there on the net purported to be Women’s Penis Size Preferences.

The guy put it up on his website to get attention. Got tons of hits. The numbers are just idiotic crazy, so it generated a lot of controversy which kept people coming back to his site.

Eventually he admitted he just made the chart up. He never surveyed women. He completely fabricated the data and the chart.

Occasionally a Thunders member comes across it and posts it, not knowing it is FAKE. Much anxiety and hysteria always ensues. Mods have to come in and tell the real story on it: It is MADE UP BULLSHIT.

I find this chart pretty suspect. Mem gave a great link to a genuine scientific study on Vaginal Size.

Sta-kool,

You mean “penis size debate” guy?

You know that website made me feel terrible for a while. Did he really admit it was fake? Obviously 6.25 girth being ideal seems a bit high I think, but it still gave me a lot of grief.

At least this chart seems more realistic than the PSD one, in my opinion anyway.

Yes, that guy. Yes, he eventually admitted he made the whole thing up.

Well, that’s good news.

What a jerk!

Thanks for the input, gentleman.

It’s kinda crazy how many guys get amped up sexually over that kinda shit. I don’t get it, like I don’t get the whole racial-anti-white-male garbage within interracial porn. But wtf, losers are losers.

The reality, sucks though like you said.

What that chart shows is the % of women that can accomodate a penis that length — as in what % of women of a certain height a guy with a penis that length WONT bottom out in.

For 5’5” women only 44% can take a whole 6.5”, in 56% of women 5’5” tall a 6.5” dick bottoms out.

The terminology ‘non-black females’ seems strange, how and why study all groups except a single one?

Well IF it’s reliable it shows a very strong breakpoint occurring between 6.5-7”, which seems reasonable given the statistics for men. Either way we know there’s a big variation for depth in women so unless you are with many women averages and statistics don’t matter.

My opininon.. 7 X5.5. One size.Fits all.

I think this is just a useless chart.

Too bad there is no study that actually looks into this. It would also be interesting to see breakdown for other races as well, and also age groups…would either confirm or disprove a bunch of stereotypes out there.