Why do guys starting at 7 inches plus bother

Jack Nicholson is radiantly beautiful?

Oh, I see… He’s less radiantly beautiful…

Still, most women find him sexy because of his attitude more than anything else.

That is extremely faulty reasoning. Just because something is an element doesn’t necessarily make it a critical element. We may not be dealing with a chain here.

In fact, particularly if we are talking about women and their preferences, the way these are prioritized has to do with a variety of inter-relationships, not a linear paradigm at all.

People do that all the time. There are a lot of good reasons for being a member at Thunder’s, many of them have nothing to do with dick size.

My own interest in PE has to do with personal ego (and therefore also insecurity), scientific possibility, and that I’ve discovered it’s just plain fun to play around with my dick.

I think this can be true for women and men.

And I have to say it is very elegantly stated.

Yeah, but I still want a bigger dick ;)

Fair enough.

We all have ambitions. Write the vision down it will surely come to pass.

I mainly did it for penis health, reversing ED was my original motive. I did not believe I could grow it bigger.

You can have a penis of great size, but if you can not penetrate a hole with it, whats the use besides taking a piss. Then ED shrinks it down and your flaccid nearly disappears at the urinal and you manage to piss on yourself. This dilemma is pitifully sad. Just get the flaccid up to two inches. Then there is something to get a hold of and pissing on yourself becomes a thing of the past.

Having a 6” inch flaccid is great.

Perhaps if you where not 6’2 and ‘good looking’ you may not have the same level of confidence that has probably greatly contributed to your success with women. We all know women thrive on confidence.. My point is when your average height and average looking you aren’t able to bring the same confidence to the game.. And women can see through fake confidence very easily.. I believe if you can enhance your dick to a reasonable practical size (under 8 inches) you should.. Providing it would give you a great level of confidence which you could use in tandom with better sex techniques to dominate more women. Nothings wrong with an average sized dick but iv met some girls who really like 7 inches plus.. And it’s not easy being 6 flat when they talk about they’re ex and his dick. Also for the benefit of members who are below average in size, the greater number of people who publish routines and results will result in a greater amount of empirical data. It’s advantageous to the smaller man.. All this work everyones doing to give them a better chance of success.

I believe they deserve it too

I agree but I’m no where near 6’2.”
Not all women want guys with over 7” because statistically there ain’t that many over 7” However at TP there are quite a few.

You know how all those butt ugly guys get all the women? It’s because they got a big dick and that’s the root of their confidence. Either you’re ugly with a big dick or handsome with a small or average one, you’ll get the ladies. Put big dick and handsome together and you double your chances with women provided that you’re not a complete dickhead. But even dickheads get tons of pussy.

No, Jack Nicholson is less fit (than Tom Cruise), and he seems have no problem with finding women who think he’s radiantly beautiful.

I believe borntodoit was referring to Manc123 - our recently banned member and thread starter.

Not exactly. Roughly speaking 1 man in every 10 has a 7” dick. Take a million guys and do the math.

When we start moving upwards from the 7” mark the percentage drops off precipitously. Even so, given that 3 men in 100 have an 8” (or more), in an area (like say, Manhattan, with 8 million people +)… Well, there are a lot of guys who are packing.

Still in all, size is of much greater importance to men than it is to women. I have no scientific data to back this up, just years of personal experience dealing with women.

Jack is somewhat less fit than Tom Cruise no question, but Tom likes to get all buff to participate in his Mission Impossible franchise, and of course the gay orgies he doesn’t tell his Scientology buddies about.

I have a hard time believing anyone finds Jack Nicholson radiantly beautiful. Charismatic, wealthy, powerful, funny, masculine even, sure. I’m with you 100%. Radiantly beautiful? No. Not since the mid-Seventies and even then he was, at best, ‘beautiful’ (hell, I would only put him at ‘cute’, but that’s just me).

Around the time of Prizzi's Honor Kathleen Turner said in an interview that he was one of sexiest men alive (they had a sex scene together), when asked what made him so sexy, she said that it was his devilish charm and his ability to make her laugh.

Comedy is king.

OK. Maybe not radiantly beautiful. Certainly charismatic, though.

He was The Joker.

Interesting thread mates. Good discussions all around. Personally, I just like to push my body to the limit. Even if I started out 10 inches I would still want to see if I could break a record. We all have insecurities. Yet, as men, we focus on our penis’ because we would much rather relate our insecurities to a physical aspect, such as penis size, than to the real route of our problems. Its more than likely the real insecurities lie within, our emotions or maybe even our social skills. I’d like to relate this all to woman and how they are never skinny enough to suit our needs. It is not that they are fat or ugly, it is that they are emotionally unstable within and compare all thier problems to their physical attributes.

AND still, I just want to have the hugest wanker on the block.

You say a lot of smart things, Mr. ModestoMan :nodding:

It’s perfect reasoning… ;) but we agree to disagree.
I never said it was a critical element (although it could be)… I said it’s an element that “can” make the crucial difference, i.e., not that “it will make” but that “it can make” the crucial difference. Remember that all these factors are intertwined/integrated and you can’t really isolate one from the other. Most of all is that they all have to perform in concert with each other in order to obtain the best possible performance. It’s also a question of degree and/or weighing of all those interdependent factors and no one individual will be like any other in that regard unless we were all like pre-programmed androids with programmable factors set to some sort of default. If one factor/element is way out of sync with the others then they all brought down. This means that a guy with a 6x5 could very well outperform a dude with an 8x6 on any given day if those other factors align themselves ( weight-wise) in just the right way. Its not all about dick size.

:-k

Did I even post in this thread? Or does this reference another post of mine?

It doesn’t matter, it is nice to be thought of, I suppose? :D

:up: