KOG,
You’ve helped to make this clearer. But, honestly, I’m still confused.
What’s the operative principle behind tugback? Does Kegeling pull only the ligs, only on the tunica, on a little of both, or on something else?
If Kegeling pulled only on the ligs, you would not expect a loss of tugback at lower angles, but rather an arrival of tugback as the ligs are stretched enough to perceptibly pull back. So the ligs can’t be pulling back, at least not consistently with conventional wisdom.
If, on the other hand, Kegeling pulled only on the tunica, I can’t predict what would happen. Is the tunica tighter on top than on the bottom? If so (and I think it is), the situation would be much like the ligaments, and you would expect an arrival (not loss) of tugback at lower angles.
Maybe it’s the corpus cavernosa themselves that are pulling back. If this is case, one would expect tugback through all angles of the clock. So what’s going on?
When I look at myself sideways in the mirror and Kegel, I see a range of tugback—Very pronounced toward noon and barely noticeable at 6. There’s no clear loss of tugback, only a gradual decline. Do other people see this gradual decline in tugback?
Also, can you get essentially the same information about lig versus tunica tightness just by stretching your penis and assessing the tightness of your ligaments?
From what I’ve read, the tunica is actually an extension of the abdominal fascia. Please correct me if I’m wrong. When I stretch straight down, I really feel the stretch toward the bottom of my abdomen, behind my pubic hair. It really feels like I’m pulling on my abdomen.
But maybe that’s beside the point. Can we simplify LOT theory, at least for the purposes of the newbies, by merely saying, work to stretch the part that feels tighter?
I really appreciate your reading this long post.