Body Genes And PE Gains Relation Theory

I received no PM C. Phantasy.

This is like watching a contest where people are racing to push shit up a hill.

Who’s winning?

Since Thunder wanted me to stop sharing knowledge trough PM:s you will have to wait brother.

But I want to add that I personally support the theory you suggested in your latest post adressed to me.
I have misstaken Endo/Mesomorphic character for representing pure Endomorphism.

Good link:
http://www.wron … postt71598.html

Pure ecto here. Before I started working out I was a 140 pounds dipshit at 6’. Now I’m 190. Of muscle of course. :)

Hmm.

djufo, I don’t quite understand, did you start at 6’? or is that your height in feet?

It just makes me wonder…

Because I’ve seen a few 100% ectomorphs (like extremely skinny and very tall) in amateur porn and in RL who have MONSTER cocks. I was wondering if there’s some weird correlation.

I’m pretty sure he was saying six feet tall. After numbers a 1” means one inch and a 1’ means one foot. I know exactly what your saying though, I made reference to the super skinny pencil armed guys having huge penis’ as well. I almost always assume they go hand in hand.

I am sorry. lol. Yeah I meant to say 6 feet tall. My initial penis size never recorded it, but I was alwayas over average.

And still nobody has posted any scientific verification of the existence of somatotypes.

Anyone else notice that those stuck on the concept of somatotypes have trouble with basic grammar and spelling?

Attack the argument, not the poster.

Good point, but I was actually abbreviating it, I’ve seen a lot of people on thunders spell it this way, “somatype” I know it’s pronounced somatotype, but I think it sounds to much like a fruit.

Thank you for your observation.

If you have anything to add, you are most welcome.

Oh, there are no winners in that competition. ;)

Yes. I feel that not only is the idea of somatotypes pseudoscience, but it boarders on eugenics. I think cluttering these boards with pseudoscientific threads is counterproductive for our common goals.

This is neither false or pretending, It isn’t a form of pseudoscience because I am not claiming anything. I’m simply asking peoples point of view.

I do not 100% believe the idea, nor do I practice anything, and I certainly do not describe methodology, all these things would describe (and are) the main fundamentals behind the term -pseudoscience-.

How is this discussion anything along the lines of counterproductive, it doesn’t say anywhere on this thread that any of the three types of somatotypes lack the ability to gain.

I wanted to discuss the gaining ability’s of the easy (naturally toned) muscle gaining genes. People that are well developed in shape and naturally athletic, and find out if they (on thunders only) have had fast gaining success.

If anything this will be (not yet) research when the poll is made and I think a lot of people will be shocked with the results. But that’s my (uneducated in the world of medicine) opinion.

I will be making a poll on the subject, I just wanted to hear peoples point of view before doing so.

Yours is noted, and respected. But inaccurate.

As I already stated, this is a good thread with a subject worth to be discussed. The controversial points of view prove it. I’m just skeptical about the outcome of the poll. Sure, anything in this universe is connected to everything, but I don’t think there will be a strong correlation of gaining ability with somatotypes. I think I have demonstrated earlier my point clear enough for those who cared to read it.

The other idea that appears in this discussion is the even stronger assumption that muscle gaining ability might be reflected in PE gaining ability. This is also very controversial. Do we really gain muscle mass during PE? I know there is no factual evidence to decide this, just assumptions.

The penis has muscles, but we don’t exercise them during PE to expect growth. We cannot voluntarily contract them (thanks heavens!). They actually cut of blood inflow, so more and stronger penis muscles would make us lose erection more rapidly, make us have a “flaccider” flaccid, which could turtle more easily. It’s not what fits well in the PE scenery and is definitely not what we see happening. That suggests that the initial assumption, that by PE we grow penis muscles is not likely to be true. It’s more likely that by PE we create more space to be filled up with blood and we stretch the TA (and the ligaments) to allow for more expansion.

If one admits PE is not about growing those muscles, then the PE routines and the technique employed by each of us is far more relevant than somatotypes.