Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Dick's changing shape: from oval to round

All my gains are from CC expansion since I have almost no CS:( . O-bends, manual clamping and erect squeezes (squeezing top to bottom with index and and thumb) did the trick for me.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Originally Posted by man-of-10
All my gains are from CC expansion since I have almost no CS:( . O-bends, manual clamping and erect squeezes (squeezing top to bottom with index and and thumb) did the trick for me.

Can you explain the difference between manual clamping and erect squeezes, at least how you do them? I am interested as you have had decent girth gains. My gains have also (partially) come from erect squeezes, although the way I did them was literally like a manual clamp. So I’m not sure if we are calling these exercises the same name.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

Placing a physical clamp on the penis gives a very strong and discrete force on the tunica that I find difficult to believe that you can achieve or maintain by manual squeeze. The tension exerted by the clamp massively increases intracavernosum pressure and distorts the tunica itself. This is not to say that erect squeeze does not work, because I believe it does (if done correctly), particularly in glans enhancement through displacement of blood from the spongiosum to the head. But erect squeeze and clamping are not synonymous.

I think it’s easy to tell if you’re going to get CC or CS growth: measure before, during and after your clamping or other girth exercises!

I have measured my width across the top and have notice some minimal width expansion. So that’s logical that I am expanding the CC’s. So if I do this continually, they will grow, right?!

I do admit that my CS is far and away the main reason for my girth gains. It expands beyond a half inch by the time I get to my final clamp set.

Chiming in here. While I’m having a hard time ascertaining what my “True” gains are as I measure whilst I’m PE’ing.I can say that most of my girth gains have come closer to the base and at the bottom of my dick. I’m not sure what CC or CS is, but I’m assuming the tubular structure running the length of my dick underneath is the CS.and that’s where my girth has primarily come from.

I will say that when PE’ing, I think my CC gets a touch bigger.but if I don’t PE for a few days, I don’t know that it has grown much. Of course, CC girth, which I believe is width, is what women like more. Having a protrusion at the bottom of the dick doesn’t really do much for women. It won’t hit the clitoris, and it basically lightly fills area that isn’t typically considered sensitive. So, of course my hard-fought girth gains don’t mean shit to my wife. Fuck her, she’s a bitch anyway.

Originally Posted by Esc
Can you explain the difference between manual clamping and erect squeezes, at least how you do them? I am interested as you have had decent girth gains. My gains have also (partially) come from erect squeezes, although the way I did them was literally like a manual clamp. So I’m not sure if we are calling these exercises the same name.


The squeezes I did back in the day consisted of “clamping” the base off manually with index finger and thumb and then squeezing the shaft from top to bottom (thumb on top on the shaft, index finger and biggest finger underneath), holding the squeeze for 2-5 seconds. I would start with a squeeze just past my clamp grip at the base, and work an inch or so up my shaft each time and then proceed to work back down towards the base. This is done with the hardest erection possible.

An alternative is to apply each squeeze during a 100% erect kegel each time (when I did this, the hold were for 2 seconds). If you really want intensity, then combine the clamp grip at the base with the strong kegel contraction for every rep/squeeze.

As for my manual clamping, I simply clamp off at the base with index finger and thumb. I will kegel as much blood as possible into my shaft, while compressing my shaft with the other hand, to make it as short and fat as possible (I want girth only, no more length thanks:) ). Usually I hold this for around 2-3 minutes. I’ll take a minute or so to recover with some slow jelqs, before starting back up with another clamping rep. I tend to get around 0.4” of temporary expansion during these manual clamping sessions.


Decemeber 2007: 5.8" BPEL x 4.9" MSEG

Current:-------->7.7" BPEL x 5.7" MSEG (7.2" NBPEL)

Current Goal:--->7.6" BPEL X 5.8" MSEG Do or do not, there is no "try".

Originally Posted by vagabund
I do admit that my CS is far and away the main reason for my girth gains. It expands beyond a half inch by the time I get to my final clamp set.

My hypothesis is that CS size is correlated with ability to get expansion in clamping, which is then correlated to ability to gain from clamping. I wish more people would respond.

When I do manual clamping I get little to non expansion in the CC but my CS blows up.
If the theory that the CC-girth is more admired than the CS-girth is correct, then it’s a bitch.
Because my CS is a big reason for my girth. It would suck to have 6” girth but inside the vagina it only would feel like 5.25”.

If you wear a cock-ring than the CS will be almost as rigid as the CS. So there maybe is hope for us CS-suckers..


BPEL: 7.25"

HG: ~6.25" | MEG:6.25" | Low shaft EG:6.5" | BG: 7"

Originally Posted by man-of-10
The squeezes I did back in the day consisted of “clamping” the base off manually with index finger and thumb and then squeezing the shaft from top to bottom (thumb on top on the shaft, index finger and biggest finger underneath), holding the squeeze for 2-5 seconds. I would start with a squeeze just past my clamp grip at the base, and work an inch or so up my shaft each time and then proceed to work back down towards the base. This is done with the hardest erection possible.

An alternative is to apply each squeeze during a 100% erect kegel each time (when I did this, the hold were for 2 seconds). If you really want intensity, then combine the clamp grip at the base with the strong kegel contraction for every rep/squeeze.

As for my manual clamping, I simply clamp off at the base with index finger and thumb. I will kegel as much blood as possible into my shaft, while compressing my shaft with the other hand, to make it as short and fat as possible (I want girth only, no more length thanks:) ). Usually I hold this for around 2-3 minutes. I’ll take a minute or so to recover with some slow jelqs, before starting back up with another clamping rep. I tend to get around 0.4” of temporary expansion during these manual clamping sessions.

Let me see if I understand here.

The “squeezes” are basically a midshaft girth expansion exercise (not really targeting head or base). You trap the blood in the middle of the shaft. I am intrigued that you use a full erection. Do you feel this gives you the best expansion? Don’t you think you could get a wider expansion using a spongier/softer erection level? Interested to hear your thoughts.

The “manual clamps” actually use the same exact base grip as your “squeezes”. I don’t understand exactly how you ‘compress’ your shaft with the other hand. Is it the same thing as the squeeze where you are squeezing the top part of the shaft to create a bulge in the middle? Or are you literally pushing down on your head with your palm (if so, ow, doesn’t that hurt)?

Thanks.


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

Originally Posted by The Door Man
Chiming in here. While I’m having a hard time ascertaining what my “True” gains are as I measure whilst I’m PE’ing.I can say that most of my girth gains have come closer to the base and at the bottom of my dick. I’m not sure what CC or CS is, but I’m assuming the tubular structure running the length of my dick underneath is the CS.and that’s where my girth has primarily come from.

I will say that when PE’ing, I think my CC gets a touch bigger.but if I don’t PE for a few days, I don’t know that it has grown much. Of course, CC girth, which I believe is width, is what women like more. Having a protrusion at the bottom of the dick doesn’t really do much for women. It won’t hit the clitoris, and it basically lightly fills area that isn’t typically considered sensitive. So, of course my hard-fought girth gains don’t mean shit to my wife. Fuck her, she’s a bitch anyway.

To be fair no part of the dick that you can expand hits the clitoris, unless you have a gigantic vein running straight on top, lol.

That said, I think the common scientific understanding is that by stretching the vaginal walls side-to-side, the wide penis ‘pulls’ the clit down (kind of like pitching a tent, but moving the stakes out further - it will make the top of the tent lower to the ground). With the clit pulled down, it is indirectly stimulated by thrusting better.

Now the million dollar question is - does a larger CS in general help with this sideways expansion? If it is just a volume issue, then yes, because the CS allows for less overall space in the vagina, meaning the width of the penis, even if it is not larger than before, will be working with less volume and will achieve more horizontal stretching of the vagina. If the bottom of the vagina is independently stretchy than the sides (e.g. not just a total volume issue), then the CS would not help with the clitoral effect. Though it still may help with the “feeling full” effect.

Intelligent thoughts?


Start: 6.6bp x 4.875eg, 2006: 7.2bp x 5.00eg (5.5 base), 2009: 7.6bp x 5.25eg (6.0 base)

28876 28885

One interesting factor is that dildos is round and not oval. As we know, a dildo feels more than a penis.
It’s probably because of the hard material, but could the form factor be another reason?

If there would have been oval dildos, we could easy compare the two.


BPEL: 7.25"

HG: ~6.25" | MEG:6.25" | Low shaft EG:6.5" | BG: 7"

By the way, if I take my width and multiply it with pi I get my girth (very, very close). This means I’ve a very round penis.


BPEL: 7.25"

HG: ~6.25" | MEG:6.25" | Low shaft EG:6.5" | BG: 7"

Long vehicle,

My sentiments exactly: if you are expanding and measuring bigger after a session, then it follows that you will eventually grow, right?

I hope so because I haven’t seen any real permanent growth on me, but I can get close to 6.25 midshaft by the end of my session.

I know the big gainers like Drilla and BigGirtha always had a good amount of expansion.

Originally Posted by The Door Man
Of course, CC girth, which I believe is width, is what women like more. Having a protrusion at the bottom of the dick doesn’t really do much for women. It won’t hit the clitoris, and it basically lightly fills area that isn’t typically considered sensitive. So, of course my hard-fought girth gains don’t mean shit to my wife. Fuck her, she’s a bitch anyway.

Well you could always fuck her sideways so that your CS is stretching her width.

I noticed an increase in CS .. I think it’s because of the overhand grip and this is why I always switch my grip style during a jelqing session, I prefer width to “roundness”


Start (october 2010) : BPEL 18,5 cm ; EL 17,5 cm ; MSEG 13,75 cm ,BEG 14,25 cm ;FL 12 cm ; FG 10,75 cm ; BPFSL 18,5 cm

3 months later ( January 2011) : BPEL 19 cm ; EL 18 cm ; MSEG 14 cm ; BEG 14,5 cm FL (hard to say if it grows due to size shifting of the soft state.. The same as before or bigger!) ; FG 11 cm ; BPFSL 19 cm***all hard sizes taken @ my hardest and doing a kegel***Goal: cementing a round 18 x 14 hard coupled with a good EQ.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02 AM.