Why not FFT ?
Ok,
For about a year I have stood idly by in these forums. However, after reading through this thread I think I need clarification.
For someone who wants modest girth gains (I.e. 1/2 inch or less) and wants the most conservative available girth procedure, how would FFT not be recommended? It seems to have the highest sample size which makes the side effects known.
Aesthetically I know the procedure seems yield bad results. But as far a permanent damage, it seems that most of the fat can be removed without the complications of other procedures.
The problem used to be overfilling during FFT procedures. But if you are willing to go for 3+ top-ups (minimal fat injected) with strict post-op behavior, the results seem to be mostly positive.
This is my first post, so please take it easy on the replies :-) . As an observer from afar for about a year, I finally felt obligated to write/ask/field opinions.
Thanks!