Originally Posted by ModestoMan
… which raises the question,
Why bother having a hanger that contacts the shaft over a length greater than about 1 inch? It appears that all the “action” is at the leading edge of the hanger, where the “shoulder” of the hanger makes contact with the compressed plug of tissue ahead of it.
It seems the rest of the hanger need only be concerned with making sure that the shoulder is well supported and maintained, that there is enough space for a tightening mechanism, and that there’s enough space and strength for anchors to suspend a weight.
One inch seems like plenty. Maybe even less would work. Hence my love of the Wenchette (It also rocks for fulcrums).
Good point. Longer hangers may have some benefits. Though they can’t grip the shaft behind the “shoulder” enough to prevent slippage, some grabbing force is applied over the hanger’s length. It’s possible that little extra grab makes a difference with heavier weights. If the hanger has internal ridges, maybe a series of “mini-shoulders” are formed under the hanger. I don’t know. A longer hanger might not have to be tightened quite as much to hold the blood in front of it.
I haven’t had very good luck with hangers that were too short. I haven’t tried toothbrushes, but Tom’s toothbrush version of the AFB (picture here) is an example of what I mean by way too short.
Too long is also counterproductive. If the hanger covers much of the shaft it’s hard to have enough skin slack behind the hanger so the load can go on the internals. Too long also interferes with fulcrum hanging.
1” as a minimum sounds good to me. I’m used to the length of a Bib Starter. Its gripping length measured down the center is about 1 5/8”.
I thought about making a hanger design that would create several “shoulder points.” To see what I mean, weave your penis through your fingers on one hand. Over the first, under the next, over the third. Something like this:
O| |
| |O
O| |
| |O
That seems to give a pretty good grip.