Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
……
I recently read an account on Bib’s forums from an orthodontist who upon reading Bib’s theory remarked how similar it was to using braces to move teeth. They target the periodontal ligament, if I remember correctly. And they apply a constant force, 24/7, and he talked about how there’s an industry accepted standard range of appropriate rates of ligament lengthening, and ranges of acceptable forces. He basically agreed that ligaments lengthen by controlled micro damage, and they continuously heal themselves in real time….
a) The periodontal ligament is quite completely different than tunica albuginea; b) you don’t know if he really is an orthodontist as he claims; c) comparing the force applied by an orthodontisc device or procedure to the force applied by an hanger is ludicrous per se; d) when you use a clamping hanger you are not applying a force 24/7; the force is applied in cycles, about the opposite way; so e) saying that Bib’ ‘theory’ is analogous to using braces to move teeth is wrong; that ‘braces’ model is actually similar to what you do when you use an ADS; which normally apply less force, for more prolonged period of times (never 24/7, though; did you know that years ago a couple of members here tried to wear 24/7 an extender (I think it was the static stretcher) and they gained nothing?) ; f) what he agreed upon, even supposing he really is an orhtodontist, only shows that he is unreliable : an orthodontist knows about nothing of ligaments; think if a physiotherapist would pretend to know how to move teeths. g) most of how much ligaments can lengthen has nothing to do with damage; and it has been shown in experiments that in connective tissue any strain triggers cellular proliferaction, without of any ‘damage’ to heal; the ‘damage’ model is not a good one for PE, there are different grades of damage and each of them has specific consequences; breaking the tunica albuginea is a damage, do you think your penis will grow longer after a rupture? Adversely : damage could be meant in such an extensive meaning to include any kind of damage; but again, this wold be meaningless, for example cells are dieing all the time in our whole body, even if we don’t pull the penis, but this won’t give a longer penis, will it?
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
….
If the rate of damage to the collagen is kept at a low enough rate, the tissue heals continuously. Low rate of damage means micro tears, heat, long time exposure while maintaining an ideal point on the stress/strain curve, which is just enough to cause failure of collagen micro-fibrils without tearing the larger fiber structures. ….
See what I mean? Show me a single study (in vivo) showing that if a healthy tendon is damaged continously at any given intensity it can heal continously and become longer. And what exactly are you meaning with ‘micro-tears’? Breaking a few fibers or what? And again, this is not what you can do with a Bib. And a ‘level low enough to heal continously is inconsistent with the idea of ‘riding the fatigue’.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
I don’t like the term fatigue either. I don’t think the word accurately captures everything Bib used it to mean: the feeling of micro damage in real time, and the damage itself. But it does save time by encapsulating an important concept into one word. And it is appropriate in that collagen fibrils fail after some time under force, and muscular fatigue has the connotation of a failure through tiring. But all in all, it causes more confusion than good because of that same connotation.
…
Oh, Bib. The Bible. Well, muscular fatigue has about shit to do with a tissue like tunica albuginea or ligs. When you feel your muscle burning, it’s the striatus muscle, not tendons. And is doubtly that there is any feeling associated to the breakage of an individual fiber. What you are exposing is just a bunch of suppositions and you believe them not for rational reasons but because you don’t know the subject and you want to believe that somebody does.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
Angle up and down determines how much of the stretch is absorbed by ligs and how much is absorbed by tunica.
….
Since stressing the ligs is no point you can save time stretching only downward. Have you ever heard a manual stretcher giving all this importance to angles? Look at those who had gains using an extender or a pump: they give a fuck to angles; all the theorization and the apparatus to hang in different position and angles is ludicrous.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
Angle left and right distributes the stretch through the side of the shaft and stress one side of the ligamenture exclusively. …
Sides and angles are two different things. Stretching to one side never stresses exclusively one side of the ligament or the shaft.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
A downward angle distributes more stress to the ligs.
…
Which is no point. The downward angle is the most effective because stretch the most important part of the tunica albuginea, the dorsal one. This is why it is the most effective. Not because lengthening the ligs serves to make your penis shift ‘the inner penis’ out of your body.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
An upward angle distributes stress through the entire shaft, all the way down to the bulbs and crux at the insertion of the penis at the perineum. …
Which serves to nothing either. I can’t help but laugh thinking that there is somebody that wants to stretch his perineum.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
This isn’t some theory, it’s easily observed and felt while hanging.Even a 30 degree angle change can make a difference in the feeling of what tissues are being stressed.
…
The theoric part is that you are supposing that those feeling have a specific meaning. You don’t know that. I have been reading from an unbiased point of view the empirical outcomes of all the things you are exposing, and I have come to the conclusion that they aren’t just inoffensive writings based on the ignorance of the subject, but they actually make harder to get gains. It is way more likely to have gains by hanging if you never heard all of that supposed ‘knowledge’. And this is thread is the another confirmation of what I am saying.
Having some experience in hanging, and reading thousand of posts, I will tell you those feelings are bad PI’s; when you start feeling fatighe, burning, aching or anything that can be associated with fatigue, stop PEing, because if you go on your tissue will just strengthen.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
…..
LOT is another thing that’s not really a theory. Hang above a certain angle, and you can kegel the weight and feel the stretch all the way back to the perineum. Hang below that angle, and you can feel the ligaments absorbing some weight, and the lower “internal” penis absorbing very little weight. Below some angle there is nothing to kegel. Loss Of Tugback. It’s not a theory. It’s just something that happens when you hang at different angles. Same is true of stretching at different angles. Different angles for different target tissues.
You have to inform yourself dude, it’s the one who invented it that called it a theory
Bib’s LOT Theory
and for your information, he suggested that LOT theory can be used to know the best way to hang to have gains. A bunch of nonsense that we are still trying to inform members that they can just forget of it and it will be better.