Gentlemen,
The following is from a pm I sent too one of the members here for his interpretation and on his advice I am reposting it here, no I’m typing it here cause I don’t know how to do that yet.
Please comment on what comes to mind in regards to this interesting thread.
“……So,
If I were to open the bottom settings up to go into more spread wide configuration and wrap with a single HTW folded Back on itself I would have for arguements sake setting 1.
What would be the effect if the gel is than removed from the hanger for the same bottom settings as above to give setting 2?
Would this mean that the remvoal of the gel now increases the well spaciousness when the hanger is tightened up around the shaft BUT that by not having the gel the hanger now grips better than with the gel for the same setting on the bottom hex nuts?
You reported somewhere that Bigger or Jelktoid said “not having gel made the hanger grip like a mother” If it grips like a MOTHER with no gel as compared to with gel than GMJ’s logic thinks that he can very deliberately open the bottom gap up to go for a more spread wide setting (to reduce urethra squashing) BUT still using the same thickness of HTW’ing cause the hanger now grips like a mother. Do you see what I am trying to ask here?
I know I gotta use another HTW to increase effective girth, I also admitt too putting it off but I am trying to get it more clearer in my mind about what happens as the spread wide increases and you then apply another layer of wrap in comparison to increasing the spread and not using the extra HTW whilst having the gel removed from the hanger.
GMJ’s logic is thinking if gel removal increases grip than the extra HTW may not be required as the spread wide setting is increased…………..”
What do you fella’s reckon about my logic here? I will be putting it into practice soon once I am over this damn Flu.
Thanks
GMJ