retention head — let’s make it “Yes we WILL” :thumbs:
Lampwick — my cylinder is a 1.75 Boston Pump standard design with ‘built in cockring’ - so the thick entrance narrows down to less than that. My girth tapers. Base is 5.5” nowadays, so the entrance is getting pretty tight.
For what it is worth, my girth is wider than in side view than top view.
I do touch the bottom side of the cylinder with other parts of my penis beside my base by the time the session is over. I want more overall girth of course, but some more top down width would be real nice. (OK, OK - I am obsessed with getting more top down width :) ). I have gained in both top view and side view.
I also have a 2” Jim Diamond that I use rarely.
gprent — thanks for the info and those guidelines - low pressure, and limited time in the cylinder once packed seems like the way to go.
Now on the other hand — it is funny, I really had it in my head that “Packing = Growth.” That was the main motivation for wanting to do this.
Since girth growth is the real goal, your comment about using the 2.25” cylinder makes me wonder if I should start using my 2.0 cylinder more often. Giving it a few whacks like petitfaun suggests. Does pumping more in the the 2” make sense to you? Lampwick?