Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
Thanks Kyrpa. The last two days I have read all over the forums about ultrasound’s use for heat in PE. You guys are breaking new ground here. The idea has been batted around for years but seems you two are the first to run with it, and with good initial results.
Well what can I say, Thundersplace is full of theories and hypothesis yet to be fulfilled from some great kitchen scientists present and past. Applications been lacking.
Generally speaking a decade ago there have been some great debates over causes of PE induced growth and how the growth occurs. Guess they all eventually fade due lack of hard medical evidence from PE applications. Lot of misleading information too if one is not aware enough to filter it properly.
But there is evidence enough from studies how to stretch ligaments and tendons. Same goes for anecdotal knowledge from fellow PE enthusiasts adapting this information to PE applications.
One of the usable tools is ultrasound other being ligament stress relaxation which are both covered in this application here.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
Manko’s urethral temperature testing shows that the ultrasound can reach up to 43-45 Celsius, while the IR lamp can only get 39-40 Celsius. However, this takes constant application of the ultrasound transducer, whereas the IR lamp heating is completely passive. At a suggestion from firegoat in another thread - if the same activity level were used with an IR lamp, by using the hands to apply and re-apply various microwavable heat gel packs or heated rice sock - then perhaps the “active IR” heat level could approach the same heat as ultrasound.
Based on my tryouts I am convinced that you need to be at minimum of 40-42 Celsius.
Unit I am using is not effective enough to maintain these temperatures without external heat pad of some form. And as you mentioned it has still to be continuously used during workouts. Clear advantage to ultrasound is that there is simply no fear of skin burns with it.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
One also must wonder if the micro-vibrations (cavitation) from the ultrasound is assisting your quick gains. I assume this energy would also contribute to the melting of collagen bonds.
Cavitation could be a factor here but the temperatures themselves I am running are probably not high enough to melt collagen bonds. US is thou an active tool in a form of collagen orientation.
Collagen fibrils tend to align with the direction of the force when tissue being stretched.
This orientation is highly accelerated with low intensity ultrasound. I interpret this as a rapid BPFSL gains.
This is also the reason I will not introduce ultrasound to a unstretched penis.
Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
Equally important to the ultrasound is the way you both are using BPFSL pre- during- and post- workout strain metrics to monitor the effectiveness of your methods. Your gains are assured by doing this, and it has confirmed for me that targeting BPFSL is a reliable source of gains. Personally I have been stuck in PE for 2 years since switching from a length focus to a girth focus. Now I believe I must target BPFSL and length again in order to gain girth via the Poisson effect.On the whole, I am reluctant to spend 700 USD for the 3 Mhz unit despite your good results. I watch your progress with interest.
Honestly speaking I find it difficult to accept majority of PE practitioners ignoring the value of BPFSL gains. This should be the main concern for every stretcher and hanger at least. BPFSL comes first then there is a great chance for BPEL or even girth gains to form if the practitioner is capable to produce them.
You have summed it up nicely concerning most of the main components here.
One thing I would like to additionally emphasize is the ligament stress relaxation being in important role in this approach.
Your reasoning sounds solid about the Poisson effect. This way I like to explain my simultaneous length and girth gains. In fact after fast BPFSL gains I introduce girth orientated workouts to fill the void so to speak. And so far it has worked quite well gaining rather proportionally.
PS. I am still running with a 150 USD apparatus knowing it might be easier with a better one.
START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"
When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)