Jones, please respond:
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315
I don’t think I overreacted. I just wanted to know if he was accusing me of something. That is all.
OK, I am accusing you of something. You are using basic Troll techniques. Specifically: Misinterpreting anyone questioning your data or intentions as a personal attack. Refusing to provide links to support you claims. Dodging legitimate questions. Attempting to portray your self as the voice of reason beset by unreasonable and entrenched authority figures. Using pre-suppositions to attempt to make all that question you look unreasonable.
I do not have the knowledge to talk about juice-technology with guys that are up on this stuff. The web is even more full of opinions that the real world. Perhaps you are dead on with your ideas, or perhaps the members with Doctorates in medicine and pharmacology are right. This is one of those cutting edge science things that even the handful of people in the world that fully understand it don’t agree upon. That is not the point of this post. The point is that you are using standard Troll tactics, refusing to address legitimate questions and concerns, preying on the hopes and fears of OUR members and endangering the health of those members. A chemistry student does not have the knowledge or expertise to assure the safety of what you are proposing. Many of the members at love-scents have questioned the safety of your ideas as well.
Do I say you are a Troll? I do not; perhaps you truly do have the best of intentions. However you ARE displaying most, if not all, of the attributes of a Troll.
Please, read the following and prove the suspicions of some of our members to be unfounded. Be mature and address our concerns rather than feign persecution. If your intention is to help guys get a bigger unit this should be no problem.
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315
“I´ve read the phermones board but I prefer counting the guys over here, besides, one guy could sign up for 10 boards under different names and post his results. That would still only be one result. Here we have a good chance of knowing that 1 guy is 1 guy. I think that´s fair with everyone. ”
Are suggesting Whitehall and I are the same person? You are forgetting that I am also on that forum. And he has been there much longer then me.
Rocco never wrote that. Nobody ever wrote that. Once again Troll behavior, trying to derail legitimate concerns/questions by pretending that they are personal attacks. Also using non-sequiters and presuppositions to link what was written with something you made up.
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315
[Bbiggerandbetter, I have no interest in fighting with you. If you choose not to believe me for any reason, I don’t care. Please don’t waste our time. I think everyone reading this thread is capable of coming to there own conclusion. [/B]
???? Yet more Trollisms. Everyone is capable of coming to there own conclusions….but…if they question you they are wasting OUR time. And once again you never addressed legitimate concerns raised by a member who has demonstrated his willingness to go the extra mile to help others. Once again you have attempted to cast your self as the everyman’s voice.
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315
I don’t think I overreacted. I just wanted to know if he was accusing me of something. That is all.
Wrong. Basic Troll method of trying to cast your self as a victim. He never accused you of anything. (referring to Rocco’s observation, above) He simply pointed out a basic internet truth “one guy could sign up for 10 boards under different names and post his results.” And you never addressed his actual point.
In response to Dino’s “What six, I didn’t know we had six people from this board on the experiment can they post there results.” Questioning that 6 guys in addition to Jones have gained from doing this.
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315
This is not the only message board on the internet.
More from Troll 101. Use a Redirect and do not address the actual question. Name the 6 people that have gained from this and provide links to prove it. Also provide a percent, 6 out of how many. If you have lab rats at sites other than Thunder’s and love-scents provide links.
When asked (at love-scents) if doing this will help with girth:
quote:
Originally posted by Jones8315here
Most people see good gains in girth.
Provide links. If these guys are all at love-scents ask them to come over and post a quick “Jones is legit” at Thunders. If they have gotten bigger tools due to you they will be glad to help. If they are members here name them. Once again, provide actual numbers. What does “most” mean? X number of guys out of how many?
To the members of Thunder’s that feel Jones is getting shagged without a lube consider:
If this stuff tests out with a sufficient control group, say 30 guys and no hair loss 3 months after stopping treatment, I WILL be spraying some of this crap on my unit. This is not about the ego of anyone at Thunder’s. Do not let someone prey on your hopes and fears. If Jones’s ideas are wrong (notice that I say IF) you can always pull your pud bigger.
I am NOT asking him to site studies to prove his theories. This is not about the science end of things, or whether or not it might work for some. I AM questioning his honesty and intentions. Please read back over the data that I have asked Jones to provide. Nothing that I have requested is unreasonable. Judge for your selves, what possible reason could he have to become indignant and refuse such simple requests? If he puts up I will be the first to post (as well as pm him) a big thank you for proving his critics wrong.
So Jones, put up or shut up.