iamaru:
“OK, I am accusing you of something. You are using basic Troll techniques. Specifically: Misinterpreting anyone questioning your data or intentions as a personal attack. ”
If I am being defensive, it is because I was attacked on this board. I was almost banned for spelling and grammar errors, while dozens have since broken that rule without the public reproach which I endured. My unequal treatment is legitimate grounds for a defensive approach.
If I ask for clarification of someones statements, it is not a misinterpretation-it is a request of clarification. I think you are reading something into my statements that does not exist.
“Refusing to provide links to support you claims”
I have already covered the reasons why some studies could not be posted. If you have been reading this thread, they should be clear.
“Dodging legitimate questions. Attempting to portray your self as the voice of reason beset by unreasonable and entrenched authority figures.”
Even If I am beset by unreasonable authority figures, I still do not see how that is relevant. How could be responsible for such a ‘portrayal’? I am only one person. Is there a question that I have dodged? Which one specifically?
“The point is that you are using standard Troll tactics, refusing to address legitimate questions and concerns, preying on the hopes and fears of OUR members and endangering the health of those members. A chemistry student does not have the knowledge or expertise to assure the safety of what you are proposing. Many of the members at love-scents have questioned the safety of your ideas as well. ”
They are not my ideas. I did not invent this. Perhaps you would know that if you have read this thread? And of course people question safety, it should be considered on a person by person basis.
“Everyone is capable of coming to there own conclusions….but…if they question you they are wasting OUR time. And once again you never addressed legitimate concerns raised by a member who has demonstrated his willingness to go the extra mile to help others. Once again you have attempted to cast your self as the everyman’s voice. ”
Hundreds of people read my thread every day. If they all said, “I trust you”, or “I don’t trust you”, it would take pages and this would be a huge waste of time.
“If Jones’s ideas are wrong (notice that I say IF) you can always pull your pud bigger. ”
Let us remember that Manuel PE has it’s very real risks.
“I AM questioning his honesty and intentions”
Ok, I will answer your questions. My intentions are to find the best ways to grow dicks. Thats all I am going to say. If you would like to come by with a polygraph machine then I’ll go for it.
“So Jones, put up or shut up.”
If what I just did qualifies as putting up, then ok. If not, then I will do neither.
“In Jones’s posts at love-scents he will occasionally start to get Trollish and then back off. Why? Perhaps he values that board enough that he makes the extra effort to stay on good terms. ”
This is baseless. Anyone can see that I act the same way on love-scent.
By the way, I think it is interesting that you have taken it upon yourself to redefine a word in the dictionary.
Your posts are self-admittedly a character assassination. You are wasting all of time so in the future I hope your posts are relevant to penis enlargement. Since character judgment is an innate sense, perhaps you could leave it to the individuals to decide.
iamaru, Since the theme is folklore, I will follow it. You are a unicorn. People who unicorn around distract threads from anything relevant. Stop unicorning. I hate it when people unicorn.
I hope we can now get back to discussing people’s results and ways to improve them.
