Animal experiments

Doing experiments covering PE is great, and something I’ve been wanting to organise for ages. I can’t see any good reason to use animals though, other than they might have some nice makeup on at the time :) .

You have two choices:
A - Set up a group of people, construct a theory about PE and test with an experiment. Present the results and reconstruct the theory around them. Become a valued member of the global PE community.
B - “Acquire” some pigs. Try to jerk off pigs. Get arrested. Become a valued member of the local prison…

I’d go for A :)

So what theory are you trying to test? How are you going to control variables? Let’s discuss the experiment itself rather than the subjects.

You got over 13000 human animals on this forum alone who do all forms of the wildest penile exercises imaginable.

We already know that PE works and we already know that different things work best for different people.

Instead of goofing around with animals, you would be better served to find out for yourself which exercise works best for you and get down to it!

you are one crazy mofo !

PE IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE !!!!!

You PULL you SQUEEZE and after some time you gain !

You can torture all the animals you want , but in the end you will still only be able to

a) pull ! = traction force

b) squeeze = pressure !

even if you found something that would make sense (i really doubt that) : ANIMAL dicks are not human dicks !!!! You can’t compare these 2 at all. How you wonna do that if you even can’t compare 2 human diks because apparently everybody responds different to the excersizes….then we have blood penis , flesh penis and so on….

don’t make it too complicated ….pull and squeeze thats what I know is getting me and everybody else GAINS !

Tube - bro, you opend up a can of snakes here that has really made my day. Who needs standup comics when we have such a great assemblage of comedic minds here at THUNDER’S? You guys made my day with some of your witty and downright FUNNY comments.

Don’t take the poking of fun as a personal shot, Tube - it is just too good to pass up for many people.

As a Biologist by training, I applaud your thinking. Animal testing has been the backbone of scientific research for most of scientific history. Drugs, medical protocols (including trauma experimentation done by the military) and much cosmetic development (with which I have problems) has been done with animals in one manner or another.

The main difficulty(ies) I see with your proposal are:
(1) size of test group and having a sufficient facility/staff to supervise the work;
(2) designing a protocol (as someone has suggested already) to cover ALL the different possible exercises we see on this board [even if you wanted to stay with simple stretches & jelking, there are MANY combinations to consider];
(3) MONEY to set up and support this program [I doubt you could get NIH grant money for this],
(4) deciding on the right animal subject to use - with similar structural and functional ability as humans, or you are doing an inept comparison/test protocol, and
(5) initial credibility - meaning that the test must meet with some kind of acceptability and have some “backing” from the scientific community. [that is not universally needed, of course, but nice to have].

Otherwise, just as with any other experimentation, on the base of your proposal there is merit. It just seems, as has again been suggested, that a better study might be a data extrapolation from the THOUSANDS of notations made here and on the HUNDREDS of other PE sites (legitimate) out there.

I salute your creative thinking, and if you can get it off the ground, count me in to assist with data collection. However, I WILL NOT do the “hands on” stuff. That is for lab assistants, and I want a lead role so I can get my name in the publication credits.

SHALOM
wan2Bbig/Alex

Further, what makes you think you’ll discover something that the well-funded and accredited vivisectionists haven’t? This just sounds like animal mutilation to me. If you’re not doing it in the context of real lab and using the scientific method (i.e. trying to *disprove* something first) this cannot possibly yield anything worthwhile.

Gives a whole new meaning to spanking the monkey.

Man, you got balls. I’m worried enough about what my wife would think if she walked in on me PE’ing, much less jerking on some monkey’s dick.

One thing though, If you did jelk him, you would probably have the happiest pet on the planet because I don’t think the monkey would show the same restraint that we are forced to and blow a load every time.

Thanks for the laugh. I needed it.

Dude, I don’t know what all the fuss is. I have been pulling on my monkey for years, ever since I hit puberty.

Bib,

This sounds like an excellent business opportunity. Hundreds of hangers for rat dicks. However, you may need to hire a couple of fly lure tiers for labor.

Tube

My dog just volunteered he wants you to come over and jerk I mean jelq him.

how would this be explained to people who happen apon us jerking off rover?

“umm, err… red rocket?”

Ah, Tube, this has been a truly great thread. <laugh>

There is nothing I can add to humor already present here today. <tinge of sadness>

But I’ll point out, on the serious side, that almost all animals are short-cummers. Chimps take less than 30 seconds, dogs don’t take much time either, nor do rats or cats. The little buggers have no self-restraint!

It’ll be a long day at the lab if you have to jelq a chimp for half an hour, 30 seconds at a time!

busted bus

The hell you don’t! I know for a fact that most, if not all jurisdictions, in America require a permit to conduct animal experiments. Furthermore, to obtain such a permit you need professional credentials - i.e., either a veterinary license, an advanced student of veterinary medicine, a biologist, medical student, certified researcher, etc. (an old buddy’s dad is a vet). In high school, we dissected frogs & fetal pigs - but those were cadavers, not live animals.

There are so many strict guidelines that researchers must follow; there’s no way in hell that any Joe out there can start cutting open animals. You would be arrested in a heartbeat & charged with animal cruelty. And when you tell the humane officials that you’re conducting penis enlargement experiments on those animals, they’ll fine the shit out of you & throw you in jail….don’t doubt it.

And, last but not least, there’s so much difference in tissues across species. Cats, for example, have clearly shown hyperplasia in controlled experiments - something which has never been definitively proven with humans. So, even if you could find out how to grow the penis of a cat or a weasel or a pig, that might not mean shit with humans.

Watch yourself, and use your head.

Hey Tube, I’ll volunteer! You can pull on my dick for an hour or two every day. Wouldn’t be the first time I was confused with an animal.

Wow, thats a lot of posts in one day. I know I must have some supporters out there who have undoubtedly been scared from acknowledging their support because of all the flack I have been getting. I’ll put together a response to all y’all as soon as I can.

Wad, If the animal rights activists get involved I may have some serious problems, but I seriously doubt that putting an animal into a coma in a human fashion is a crime. It could be but I just don’t think so.

And no you don’t need a license. My friend operated on chimps as a first year graduate student in psychology, and never received any sort of anatomy training on humans or animals.

-Tube

1st of all, you can perform many more experiments on animals than you can on humans because you don’t have to worry too much if you damage their penis permanently.

2nd of all, you can’t dissect a human penis.

3rd of all, there is something to be said for multiple forms of evidence and different perspectives.

4th, its in the name of science, not vanity. These are inded serious unexplored medical questions. We would be working at the forefront of human understanding.