Please excuse the length of time it has taken me to add my two cents again. What you are proposing is very complex and requires a lot of reflection on my part before I feel I can contribute in a positive way. Also, your brain works faster than mine and when I get back to post my thoughts I see five more posts to consider. I will try to address them all from my last post on.
First off about the ultrasonics. I know they use ultrasonic technology in the beauty industry but again the units are hand held and are constantly moved over the surface of the skin so as not to build focus on one spot. I am not saying don’t use ultrasonic technology. Just to be careful if you are going to use it. You only got one dick (I imagine) and I would hate to see you risk localized internal soft tissue heat damage/coagulation simply because of an oversight. I still feel from a standpoint of safety IR heat is best although I am not sure how practical it would be to use in your application. The upside of IR heat is that it is a “no brainer” in that its deep tissue heat is effective and safe with no “pitfalls” that I can think of.
Absolutely love your flight case with the nuclear warning stickers and all by the way.
I also want to say don’t think you are alone and there is no interest in what you are doing. I think there is great interest in what you are doing and plenty of it. It’s just that what you are doing is very complex and even with my engineering background feel a bit “in over my head” in trying to comment on the technical aspects. I really have to think hard about this and that is why it takes me so long to reply.
I think the idea for a juction box with a main umbilical is the way to go if you don’t want a spaghetti nightmare. You’ll save a lot of future frustration tracking cords down. Wish the other technical aspects were as easy to weigh in on - hahaha.
I am assuming you want to use microcurrent technology to speed healing and promote tissue growth. Unfortunately, what I know about that you can put in a thimble and have room for a cup of coffee. So if there are any pitfalls I can’t give you a heads up there.
As far as the Ferarri people go, I truly think gain in inches and in bank account is not a bad thing. In fact gain in the bank account department would allow you more freedom in your R&D work. Usually a project of this magnitude is backed by a corporation and numerous engineers with the bank account to keep it going. If you get this off the ground that is really saying something.
As far as the “shortcoming” of the BCT angles goes I can only say this. I have never seen anything designed so that it can do everything well. Whenever they try to design too much into something they always end up with something that does nothing well. Case in point, motorcycles. I have never run into a motorcycle that is great at off road and on the street. Instead, they are just bad at both. Same for rifles. No such thing as a hunting rifle that doubles as a top of the line target rifle. Same thing with knives and countless other things. I am not sure you should ‘muddle’ a good design by trying to make it double as a jet ski although I am sure you could. In fact I would encourage you to go the other way. Make the best jelqing machine in the universe. Then make the best stretching/hanging machine and so on. That way you can focus on the best way to approach each. I am not being critical. I would just hate to see a great idea fall by the wayside because “the stretching aspect is great but the other stuff don’t work” kinda thing.
Take a few a few steps back and don’t rush this. You’re on to something and if you do it right you’ll end up with something that has a huge market. Believe me.