Fool_4's automatic PE device

Dude, WTF!?!?

Guys, if the Fool suddenly disappears don’t worry. We may be relocating him to one of Thunders secure PE R&D facilities.

I do have a couple of questions at this point,

What’s the length of travel on the rack and pinion ? It occurred to me that if a guys dick came out of the tube on the upstroke it could get mangled on the return ?

Couldn’t you achieve much the same action with a static tube and a variable vacuum

Also how easy is this thing going to be to clean ?

I’m going to say it again dead man’s switch!

Capernicus1, The stroke is variable, depending upon the “routine” being ran, if it’s “clamping” it’s simulating, no travel, just the “cuff” inflates and clamps. If it’s Jelqing the “cuff” inflates and then the rack is cranked away from the user at any speed set, from .1 IPM to 300ish IPM. If it’s just a straight vacuum pumper session then just the frontal chamber is evacuated to whatever level the device is programmed to. Looks like I will be able to nail any of these 3 styles of PE, or any combination of the three. One would not program the stroke to go far enough to release one’s member, also I would not expect this to be strapped so rigidly to the user as to be able to cause injury on the down stroke. The down stroke will be with vacuum being applied to insure that there is no issue of penis loss.

I have much code to write now. This is where the “time” is going to go, and what I consider to be my strong suit.

Behemoth, It will be okay. Before mini-me is cast in the role of “test pilot” this thing will have made thousands of strokes and be under absolute control.

For this to be able to jelq and do sets of combinations of routines all night long, some form of lubrication injection will also have to be provided for. I have a couple ideas for this, but am holding off for the moment.

Thanks,
F4

Of course there is no way I can let this thing rest and thoughts keep running through my mind as I try to do other things.

First off, if I could put something like that together I’d be gloating too. Of course I am way backed up on the posts but I will try to address all up to the present. The pictures say it all. Incredible.

When I asked about the forces involved I knew based your server motor and air pressures that it would easily reach excessive force. My question is can the mechanical and pneumatic forces be modified so that they are not excessive but still be able to easily cycle the machine? This might be asking too much as perhaps just the slightest movement of the rack requires “excessive” force. I realize it is better to have smooth cycling and predictable excessive force than any form of unpredicability. Anyway, just a thought.

Your last post ended up answering most of my questions as well as anticipated some of my suggestions so I dropped the useless stuff and continued.

I know you have thought of the cycles the unit would go through once everything is in place (including the penis). Do you plan to allow within limits for operator programming? Are there going to be many different “mini” cycles to choose from? Are you also thinking of adding an optional one total cycle encompassing every movement? The possibilities are endless and there is great potential there for operator feedback/database evaluations as well. As stats are accumulated, software adjustment updates could keep gains at a more and more efficient level. Keeping good stats might end up being the most important aspect in our understanding of PE gains and your machine could keep up with it all.

Also your design the way you have it now allows for great cycle and movement flexibilty. I see incedible potential there for stretching cycles with feedback for length, simulated weight, heat, time, rest, percentage deformation and even lig roller massage during pull if desired.

Perhaps I missed my calling as a writer for the Jetsons. Anyway, just figured I’d share these thoughts with you.

Keep up the good work F4. Can’t wait to see what your evil genius mind comes up with next.

I hate to post without writing anything constructive however, I need to say that that thing is amazing. I always wanted to have mad engineering skills, unfortunately I went to school and didn’t learn crap so my computer science degree is pretty worthless. It’s my own fault but watching this come together makes want to go back and actually pay attention. Keep up the good work I would post more often but some of your post go over my head.

DGA, I have ran into some software compatibility issues, so instead of coding (for PE or my REAL job), I will be doing battle with Bill Gates’s monster most of the afternoon, wish me luck.

Yosh, school is overrated, I didn’t make it to high school. Read and tinker, you will learn WAY more and do it faster, school now and even in the 80’s was already teaching to the slowest common denominator.

F4

Thanks for the tip F4, I do like to mess around with stuff the problem is that before I ever master any one thing I move on to something else. My problem is more of a not seeing things through than anything. That is what I have to work on most actually completing tasks. I will definitely keep tinkering though and maybe some day have at-least have the sweet ass skills you posses.

Here’s an update on the goings on. I have hopped everything over to it’s new and final case. The “effector” will be able to be stowed in as originally planned (love it when a plan comes together).

The control scheme for reciprocation has again been redefined. Now I will not be using the Gecko drive. The plan is to take the 5V TTL encoder directly back to my counter card and close the loop with a PID loop in the PLC (actually two cascaded loops, one inner, one outer). The motor power is being supplied by a $15 made in china amplifier card and an analog output from the PLC. Reverse is accomplished via DPTP relay. When referring to “inner” and “outer” one is usually talking about load and velocity, with this scheme it will move at the commanded speed until it’s pull reaches my current setpoint. Another little sticker, the H2-CTRIO card only supports high volt encoders, nothing under 9V, so now I will need to build a little ckt with a couple transistors to translate this over. This is like eating a freakin elephant!

Thanks for watching,
F4

The reason I keep harping on the dead man switch is that when in pain the mind can make us act irrationally and there has been more than a few reported injuries at thunders place from much simpler things (even manual methods). When we are talking mechanical force and body parts (hell it could be a finger in the rack and pinion), we are talking possible accidents, and hence the kill switches on most machinery. Ere on caution to the max, extreme pain can make you pass out, and repetitive mechanical force teamed with this could be catastrophic (plus you would be leading any one else’s efforts to copy your work with a great deal of responsibility).

On a cheerier note, have you thought about how you will enable your machine to start each stroke maximally bone pressed (in order to cut down on the baseball bat effect)? You may have to strap yourself in to get that extra half inch or so, which in a way will also lessen the chance of a forced erect bend happening, perhaps a slower back stroke with the griping pressure released might be in order as well.

Have you read much in the pumper’s forum about optimal hg? Many find best results around the 2-3in hg mark especially when not well conditioned

Pretty amazing F4. I realize you had most of this stuff just lying around the house (who doesn’t really? :) ), but if you had to source everything, what do you think the cost would be? Not asking you to take you time and profit margin into account, just wondering what the parts would cost. I can’t help it, I’m an accountant at heart.

It’s 5.30 am here, I just finished reading the entire thread, I’m simply amazed about everything.
It’s like a BBC or Imax documentary, I have no words to describe it. While reading all the comments, I see passion, I see incredible skills, etc, I imagine sending a guy like F4 back to 1900, with his skills and imagination, today, in 2012, we would be travelling to distant planets in a few minutes, and we would have a machine to copy and produce a fruit, a tv, an arm,everything.
Really, at least, for me, It’s amazing, what you’re trying to create.

However, if a guy from betclic or any other bet website comes here and read it, we may find, near a Spain- England score, something like

Please bet. F4 at thunders loses his dick / F4 at thunders gains 5 inches in 2 months, and Rocco siffredi suicides, when he learns about the 12” dick.

Sure I’m kidding, your engine will be tested on 100 pounds of bananas before you insert yours.
Really, make sure you can stop it, with some timing protections, like automatic stop after x minutes, or a 2 hands contact, like the tgv in France, if you don’t touch 2 metallic zones with your hands, the engine stops. This I’m case you faint, or feel bad and can even push the OFF button. Hope you see what I mean. For the tgv example, the driver must hold the commands with both hand. Just 1 hand means the driver may not be paying attention, or feels pain,etc.

Back to your engine, I guess you must insert your penis already erected? And when It’s jelqing, if you lose your erection, how will the engine do to guess if its a 20,50,90,100% erection, in order to adapt the ‘girth’ of the engine?

Is there a way to know in real time your current girth(penis), so your engine can apply more pressure, if a threshold is hit, in case you go too much flacid, vrrrrrrrrr,bzzzzzzzz,tchoooooo,zaaaaaaa,hey, penis, take these extra hg and pressure, and return to your 70% erected state, so we can go on.. You see what I mean? This to avoid an infinite pressure , and have the penis stretched like a pencil.

Well, I’m not an engineer, and I’m a newbie here on thunders, and on PE, don’t wanna say idiot things about how it should work, and my experience with PE is limited as well, so I will just follow this thread and read every single post from you,F4.

Thanks for sharing your stuff with us.

English isn’t my native language, my apologies.

Thanks for the reassuring comment 2peronot2pe. What I have constructed and am still coding and adding onto may not in the end be all that. Tissues still need recovery time, just being able to inflict lots of trauma in less time may in the end not be a plus at all. The jury is still out and I know why you are not seeing much boastful talk from the old hands about this being so “end all” great. Growth is the only relevant issue. Proof is in the pudding. I am hopeful, but can see where this might just be a VERY costly toy.

I am hoping to suspend this over a sofa where I sleep and have cycles performed possibly the first couple hours of each night.

No worries on the English, I am used to second lang English, spent the last decade married to a Thai.

Still stuck in the coding minutia, Think n’ Do does not like HMI’s much, it’s usually a PC based control solution though my WinPLC does half ass support one.
First run, I must confess, had no PE functionality, but does double as an “insatiable cowgirl” with the tightest, uhmm, on earth and abilities no mere mortal woman could EVER manage. Needless to say a cleaning procedure has been tested. :(

F4, hacking away

Why am I so damned obsessed with this thing? I am dodging customers now to get more time to get this thing over the line. This is not healthy.

F4