Is the angion method compatible with other forms of traditional PE?

Is the angion method compatible with other forms of traditional PE?

How could it be jelquing, pumping, clamping, hanging etc. If so, separated by how many hours between the two disciplines.

As I understand it, AM creates new blood vessels and then tissue while traditional PE is based on the rupture and reconstriction of tissues with the consequent enlargement and I don’t know if these two methods can be complemented and improved.

I guess there will be people who have experienced it and it can be a good place to exchange impressions.

Regards

Blood vessels do not nor ever will create new tissue. That is dumb! As tissue grows it’s growth creates the need for new blood vessels.

Thank you for acalation but what do you think about: “Is the angion method compatible with other forms of traditional PE?

How could it be jelquing, pumping, clamping, hanging etc. If so, separated by how many hours between the two disciplines.”

If you feel it will help you then do it. It won’t hurt you but you won’t get any growth without the jelqing and stretching.

The “Angion Method” is garbage as far as growth goes. The thumb over thumb exercise is just a unique and very specific way of edging. As such, it is most beneficial when performed right after your traditional PE workout.

edit point; So I guess I’m saying, yes, it is compatible, and there is really no need to separate it from jelquing, stretching, pumping, or whatever else. Just throw it in at the end of your workout, like you would traditional edging.

If you listen to the creator of the method the answer is no it is not compatible.

If you listen to people who have tried it the answer is usually yes it is compatible.

If you believe it creates new blood vessels you are mistaken.

There are a bunch of guys on another forum that swear by it for EQ. I’m interested in it for that reason.

Then give it a try.

People who do angion method for EQ should be a bit careful, because vein inflammation have similar repercussion. it’s redness, swelling and blood clotting. Basically any outflow hindrance makes erection stronger. For example, idea of clamping is to do that intentionally. Or you can press with thump at that spot for 15s or few minutes and see similar result. But when you do clamping, you are in full control of that. It’s short duration and have no real damage. On the other hand, if exercise made damage which lead to outflow hindrance, then it’s absolutely opposite situation. There is no any control there.

I did it for at least eight, possibly ten weeks. It is good for EQ. But it is never, ever, going to grow your penis bigger. So if you want to do it for EQ, I say go for it. I think you will have a good result.

There is a lot of controversy about it, so I ask about user experiences.

Thanks for the clarification, have you tried it? Do you think it has any extra benefits than edging?

I eat a lot after the routine

I have been cherry picking from the AM catalog for EQ.

AM 3 which I tuned for the way of jelqing CS only.
Manual fulcrum stretches as the author presented, author might have named it somehow, as he usually did.
And not to get confused this is only for erections. My manual fulcrum stretching rituals for SIZE are quite differently composed.

Both used for triggering erection, which they do quite nicely nowadays.
First mentioned has had really significant role for curing my deflated glans problems which have hunted me for life.

For growth?. Simply NO. For EQ strongly YES
Compatible .YES

I’ll have to read through his thread. All I know is the next day from doing a only a few minutes of his exercises I woke up with raging hard on’s. It made me a believer and I was actually seeking improvements in EQ because of quitting porn and suffering the flatline effect for some time.

He might not have the exact science down but for at least some of his exercises I believe he was on to something.

His , I don’t know what to call them, theories, hypotheses, ideas were completely goofy. The thumb-over exercise definitely work for EQ. As far as the “science” behind it, it was all made up, and completely wrong. I started a thread trying to get a discussion going as to what was actually happening, and why it was such a good EQ booster. It quickly became a shit show, with the thread devolving into a battle about the originator, and his bullshit claims of size gains. My own theory is that the exercise causes low levels of inflammation and irritation. Which triggers more often erections and chubbies. It is definitely a kick-ass form of edging, but not much good for much else.

I stumbled across a wealth of research regarding pneumatic compression of the legs to improve blood flow and creation of new arteries in the limbs especially the legs. There is a ton of research out there. Even pictures of new arteries growing in the leg from compression several times a minute. It’s not theory. The rush of blood causes shear stress which releases nitric oxide and growth factors inside the vessels. It’s used to treat blood flow problems in the leg mostly (diabetics etc). I think the angion method *in theory* seems like it could speed up blood flow in similar ways to compression therapy in the limbs, but like everything else, it has to be proven. For example, there’s no muscle in the penis, so you can’t just extrapolate the limb studies to a penis even though it sounds like it should work. THere’s even a study that shows compression therapy in the legs improved blood flow near the balls, they were showing there were upstream nitric oxide benefits. I’m not surprised it helps EQ and agree it seems like a great therapy for ED on the surface. I agree, I can’t see how it could create a longer penis. A fatter one, maybe. One with more arteries, very likely. But it needs some scientific testing and proof.
Anyway, I won’t post links just google sequential pneumatic compression therapy and all the science, methods and even devices are there.