Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Real Average Must Be Bigger

◀ 1 121314151617 ▶

Originally Posted by redbear52
I don’t think that the opinions of 2 women who hang around a penis enlargement site is necessarily reflective of the penis size preferences of the general female population.

Why? I mean when I came to this site I thought most guys would be smaller than average. That’s why they wanted bigger ones. If I was a guy who liked big breasts, I wouldn’t necessarily hang out on sites with girls with small breasts trying to make their breasts bigger.

Starting Size: April, 28, 2010: NBPEL-7" Girth-6" (base, MSG, glans)

Currently: BPEL-8" NBPEL-7.25" Girth-6.25" (base)/6.125" (MSG)/6.125" (glans)

Well, first a sample size of 2 is hardly going to be representative of anything.

Second, I think women who frequent a site like this are very likely to be more “penocentric” than the average women. I believe the average women really doesn’t give a shit about penis size unless it is really big or really small, in which case it is less desirable. And I believe that women who are more penocentric than average tend to prefer significantly larger sizes.

Originally Posted by neven
What do you think about percentage of man with penis length over 8+” BPEL and 8+ NBPEL”
In this poll only 2.18” “Pre PE Poll” (but most people measure incorrectly)

If we go by the most common “agreed to” size numbers of 5.9” mean length and 0.8” Standard Deviation, 8” BPEL is 2.625 SD above the mean.

2.567SD equates to 0.5% above and 0.5% below the SD measures.

Out of the overall population, men who are longer than 8” BPEL are likely to occur less then 1 in 200.

I’ll take some time to do a mean and SD with Thunder’s Place pre PE survey and give numbers for that next.

Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by kdong

Out of the overall population, men who are longer than 8” BPEL are likely to occur less then 1 in 200.

1 % over 8” NBPEL i think, but real (correct) BPEL i think 1%-4% over 8”.

Start - 20.10.2010 - SHORT GOAL - LONG GOAL - LONG ,LONG,LONG GOAL

BPEL - 8.25" - BPEL - 8.65" - BPEL - 9" - "SHANE DIESEL" or "JACK NAPIER"

MSEG - 6.35" - MSEG - 6.70" - MSEG - 7" -

Just finished with the pre-PE length numbers, I used the table posted by trips on page 12.

Using the middle of each measurement band (ie. 4.125” for 4”~4.25”) the arithmetic mean is 6.242” with a 0.82” SD.

Using the lower bound for each band (ie 4” for 4”~4.25”) the arithmetic mean is 6.17” with a 0.82” SD.

Based on the sample provided by Thunder’s Place, the 5.9” Average 0.8” SD BPEL numbers are supported.

The 1/4” - 1/3” diference in the average length between the commonly cited 5.9” and the Thunder’s Place 6.24” or 6.17 “is easily attributed to either self-measurement bias, or a small sample bias.

Of interest is that the Kinsey study used self measurement, and ended up with almost exactly the same measurements as Thunder’s. 3500 subjects as a sample size, and a mean length of 6.21”. (Thunder’s 6.17”-6.24”)

The Kinsey study supports the probability that measurement bias contributes to the longer arithmetic mean BPEL for the Thunder’s Place and Kinsey studies, as opposed to the professionally measured average length of 5.9”.

Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Last edited by kdong : 11-27-2010 at .

Originally Posted by neven
1 % over 8" NBPEL i think, but real (correct) BPEL i think 1%-4% over 8".

Maths doesn’t lie.

With Thunder’s Place study numbers of BPEL 6.24/0.82 SD (likely skewed by self measurement bias as described by my post above):

8"+ is 2.15 SD above the mean.

At only 2 SD above the mean, the value is 2.25%, 2.15 SD makes the percentage even smaller.

http://en.wikip edia.org/wiki/S … ndard_deviation

Kdong Starting: 7.1 x 5.125 vol = 14.84 cu. in. Current: 7.1BPEL 5.5 MSEG = 17cu. in. GOAL --> 8.5 x 6.5 vol: 28.6 cu. in.

Took Time off, lost some gains-- Girth cemented

No PE since 2015 -- starting back up

Originally Posted by neven
1 % over 8” NBPEL I think, but real (correct) BPEL I think 1%-4% over 8”.

8 NBPEL or more is under 1%.
I think around 0.8%

Originally Posted by redbear52
I don’t think that the opinions of 2 women who hang around a penis enlargement site is necessarily reflective of the penis size preferences of the general female population.

We would need at least 1000 women to get somewhere.

Originally Posted by vagabund

And like everyone here knows, it doesn’t seem to matter WHAT size you are.us guys can get insecure.

True.
Most people suffer from DD

I would really really really like if this thread stopped popping up on top of “View Today’s Active Threads” list each and every god damn time I check it.

Originally Posted by UpTo7

I would really really really like if this thread stopped popping up on top of “View Today’s Active Threads” list each and every god damn time I check it.

And yet you still point at it and click. :D

firegoat is fully RETIRED from Thundersplace.

All injuries happen from "too much", or "too much, too soon" or "doing the exercise incorrectly".

Heat makes the difference between gaining quickly or slowly for some guys, or between gaining slowly instead of not at all for others. The ideal penis size is 7.6" BPEL x 5.6" Mid Girth. Basics.... firegoat roll How to use the Search button for best results

Originally Posted by vagabund
Mick,

Indeed relativity will come into play as it always does in any aspect of life.

I wasn’t being literal about her laughing. I just meant that I wonder how she will internally respond. Will she say, “ok, this will be good.” Or will she say, “Jesus dude.. you said you were big! This is run of the mill!”

But as you say, it will depend on her past references.

So amazing that you’re 6.5 now, Mick. I congratulate you (as I’ve done a million times before). It makes you a genuine monster dick owner and the girls most go crazy for it!

I gather those girls that comment that they’ve had bigger, by the way, was strictly said to try to undermine you.

Why the hell would any girl say that to a guy?!!

You just can’t trust information like that.

Did you actually tell her you were big? I would have maybe hinted at the fact that you might be big, then when she saw it she’d be in for a surprise (surprise that you’re big, not small)… but if she happens to think you’re not massive then no big deal.

Anyway, all you can do is do it and see what happens… I’m sure it’ll be fine. She sounds amazing by the way… exactly my type.

Also, I don’t think they were lying… I mean it IS possible. They didn’t just say it out of nowhere… we were talking about it (I probably brought it up, lol) and they seemed honest. These weren’t girlfriends… just one night stands so I didn’t care. This one girl talked about this guy who was just apparently so incredibly massive that she wouldn’t have sex with him. Could have been made up, but it was just a regular discussion so I think it was true.

This is great

erectionphotos.com

Start - 20.10.2010 - SHORT GOAL - LONG GOAL - LONG ,LONG,LONG GOAL

BPEL - 8.25" - BPEL - 8.65" - BPEL - 9" - "SHANE DIESEL" or "JACK NAPIER"

MSEG - 6.35" - MSEG - 6.70" - MSEG - 7" -

Originally Posted by firegoat
And yet you still point at it and click. :D


Because I’m fascinated that someone can be so unbelievably obsessed and devote literally ~90-95% of his posts to statistics about average dick size while his starting size is over 8”x6” and whenever I see his name, I think to myself “Wow, what new and revolutionary did he found out now?”, get it? :p

At first I didn’t mind, but now it’s downright (excuse the language, but I’m sure ThunderSS won’t mind) annoying the fuck out of me.

Top
◀ 1 121314151617 ▶

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.