The Theory of Penis Relativity

Wad - the Kinsey data was SELF-MEASURED and has been totally discredited! Durex, LifeStyles and other condom companies have done professionally-measured surveys since, as have doctors in Brazil, California, etc. The most accurate data I could find, that corresponds very closely between good surveys, is average 4.85 inches girth and 5.9 inches length. The self-measured Kinsey data came in at something like 6.2 average length, which almost no modern surveys support.

So what the hell is the “actual” average length and girth?

Between 5” to 7” is average.

4.85 inches erect girth, 5.9 inches erect length. Almost surely NOT bone-pressed.

wadzilla seems to feel that the average size, and the subsequent bell curve, has larger sizes overall.

For example, some people here see the Lifestyles data and add an 1” to it, based on the idea that average fat pad is 1”.

The idea is the way they measure is not the way we measure so we have up the overall average to compensate for the discrepancy between BPEL and NBEL.

I would point out that this discrepancy would only be true of length, not girth, and I would add that I don’t think the overall discrepancies, if any, are that large. I tend to trust the Lifestyles measurements and think the fat pad factor is not as great as many here think.

Para-Goomba’s true average thread is a good read for all sorts of studies and much argument about what they all mean.

I would agree.

But we all have our opinions, don’t we?

Mr. Happy - the bone-press issue is a big one in measurement, but I just think practically about it: think of those nurses doing the LifeStyles survey - you can be sure they just held the ruler or tape to the groin, and didn’t press it in hard. So those measurements were, to me, almost surely “NBP”. They would have had me at 7 inches rather than 8, I bet.

If you did end up doing this, bear one thing in mind: what might “hit the ground” could be you - when the police are called & they throw you to the ground & arrest you for indecent exposure.

Hence why I said DREAM…..In which things in real world would likely not happen. And anyway, it would be the sweetest arrest ever. Can you imagine explaining that to the judge…….Yes your honor, I have a bid dick and I felt I needed to dispell certain myths and accusations that dispute that fact.

When I was in University, guys in our fraternity would have an annual dinner after which we will go streaking around campus.

Once one of our friends got caught by the campus patrol.

He was brought in university court a few weeks later.

There the judge said that the case was dismissed as he too once streaked naked on campus during an annual event and it was part of the tradition.

“Discredited”??? By whom? I constantly see medical experts continue to refer to it.

Perhaps it’s been “discredited” by those who wish to believe that “average” is smaller than it really is.

LOL.
Then you can say, “Your honor, may I please show the court ‘Exhibit A’?”

Then you could whip it out and commence slapping it against the judge’s bench, tipping over his things - as the courtroom gasps in shock…..

Or the multitude of surveys done since which come to a lower average. Perhaps fat-pads were just smaller way back when?

No to jack the thread, but I noticed your Avatar.

I hope Ricky knocks his head off tonight.

Wad: the Kinsey data is still used ONLY because The Kinsey Report was a HUGE deal, the “original” sex research, and is still bantered about a lot. It absolutely WAS self-measured. And the good surveys since then, and there have been many, were NOT. Self-measured surveys always come out larger. What is so complicated about this? Why would you trust a self-measured survey?

Dangleman I wonder if the nurse measured from the side, do you know from what area did the measure? For all we know they measured from underneath.