5000 guys in lets say “Minnesota” get a licence to deer hunt. Out of those 5000, lets say, only 500 get a 12 point buck.
4500 say they didn’t get a 12 point buck, 500 say they did.
Does the statement of the 500 indicate they are lying, just because the 4500 stated otherwise?
Obviously not.
Wad, what we are taking issue with you is your unequivocal statement that pumping doesn’t work.
There are at least several respected members here who say it has worked for them. They have NEVER claimed that those who haven’t gotten results are lying, or are wrong. They are merely relating their personal experience, that they have.
To someone who isn’t blinded by a set in stone bias, it should be obvious that pumping CAN work, but it obviously hasn’t worked for everyone.
If you were to state that you believe other forms of PE are more effective for a greater percentage of people, the discussion would end…because that is a reasonable statement (may not be accurate, though).
For you to state that it doesn’t/can’t work, I would have to assume you, who have not pumped, has greater authority on the subject than, or lets say, Avocet, who has pumped for years.
Avocet has claimed to have made excellent gains (many others also make this claim) from pumping alone.
You tell me…whom do YOU think WE should consider to be giving valid information, verses just an opinion presented as a fact?
From a physics point of view, force is force. Whether it is generated by a hand or a pump. The only question is in proper application of that force to achieve the end result.
If you believe PE can work, then you are admitting that proper application of force can create a net expansion of the volumn of the penis.
Further, you MUST admit that not everyone is successful in there PE attempts, or at least people have varying degrees of success with their PE….right?
So, if you admit to the above, then the obvious conclusion is generating forces, properly applied to the penis CAN cause expansion to the penis, however there is a factor of appropriate application, and the variable of subject response.
Where does pumping violate any of those parameters? It generates a force… that can be applied to the penis…which can cause expansion. It is also subject to proper application and subject response.
The pumpers forum is filled with articulate, intelligent people (as I find most of Thunders Place) who have made the study of proper application and subject response their area of study and experimentation.
I might add with a reasonable percentage of success and reproducibility, at least reasonable for PE.
When I first started with PE, I studied all the forums. Maybe I missed something you found. I didn’t find any one single method of PE where EVERYONE was writing in saying that WITHOUT FAIL they were getting success….did you?
Its also telling to me that you use the MDs to validate your position about pumping being ineffective, yet their postion is ALL PE is ineffective. If you use them as validation, it nullifies your position that you have achieved success with other techniques, making YOURSELF an invalid source of information.
Every technique seems to have a percentage of success and failure. If I missed the 100% success rate technique, please write it in your response, because I’m here for a bigger dick…not to “sell” a particular technique.
Not many people can hit a dime at 100 yds with a rifle shot…that is a reasonable statement.
To say it CAN’T be done, is just flat out WRONG!
Sparkyx