I started this with ideas and biases. I changed them as I used this system. I’ll showcase some of those now.
New material is in italics to contrast prior thoughts.
Again, this log will receive no more updates. Only replies when needed. The first PE4F experiment is over.
Objective
My main goal with this high pressure pumping remains ultimately curve correction. Meaning my highest priority is aesthetic in value. This is fine. I am happy with this.
There is a very useful curve direction element at play with PE4F pumping. If it were not for my desire for more length i would simply do this for another year or two.
Hypothesis #1
My main theory is that negative pressure and a cylinder smaller than my base girth will cause a pressurized erection to straighten at higher pressures when the tube is packed.
The rate of correction I have seen leads me to believe 2 more years would yield a straight, longer and thicker cock if I were regular with my sessions.
Evidence:
* Several long-term pump users have totally mitigated sideways curves with long term use of the same tube for pleasure by packing the tube.
* Erections have been straighter still since the first campaign of 36 sessions and straighter still at session 46 of total.
At 58 sessions I regret not taking the project into the next year as a solo endeavor but this information indicates I have potential to combine this with something else to continue my curve correction and size quests.
Hypothesis #2
My secondary theory is that clamping will offer a more complete warm-up for my Corpus Cavernosums and Corpus Spongium in preparation for them to be targeted for expansion during high pressure pumping. Clamping with inner pressure is still a good precursor as negative pressure will be of greater total force than Clamping. This also is a more well rounded force pattern that will attack the inner layer of the tunica, then the outer layer, and inner layer again at the end. Then, because of the high stresses involved in clamping, I do not need to extend my pumping time as long as I did in my first campaign to see results.
My findings support this theory in my mind still.
Evidence:
* post-session expanded erection girths are comparable or greater than post-session expanded girth with pumping alone for my first campaign early on. General temp girth gains for first campaign early were 1/8” (.125) while here it is usually 1/4-3/8” (.25-.375) and this has been true since I started back. I compared Round 3-10 with round 39-46. Start at page 9 or 10 to compare findings.
* edema has typically been low, so expansion has been both real and controlled
* post-session expansion has lasted as long as pumping alone even though the pump times are greatly reduced
* all results or results that I feel are occurring are comparable to my first campaign in a more efficient time frame so far
Goals
* Straighten Erection- Progressing visibly
* Even girth throughout shaft to less conical- Progressing visibly and in a measured way. Circumcision scar is gaining faster than MSEG (mole area) and is likely to catch up.
*Gain length- Progressing slowly. Progress is hovering at a strong 9.25” with trending up on good days to close to 9.4” which is Progress from 9” trending to 9.25”
Length stalled as I stopped pumping. I mark it at 9.125” BPEL now, to be honest. Clamping for maintenance has cemented 6.25” MSEG strong and brought the circumcision scar to 6.1” over 5.8” which is a big gain. Additionally it needs to be said that i have never been solidly over 6” MSEG prior to this project and had been wrestling with gaining girth for 2 years before this experiment. This, puts my mild cemented girth gain in perspective I think.
My Path Forward
I foresee at least another 20 to 30 sessions using my current 2” diameter LeLuv tube. Maybe more depending on curvature progress and tube packing progress.
I made it to the 2.25” in 10 sessions.
After I reach full tube packing and pretty much fully straightened I will move to the 2.25” diameter cylinder and work towards packing it in the same way. This will take months. I will reassess goals when I’m done with the 2.25” tube….which is a long ways from now.
I project a 6-10 month ride in that cylinder before moving up again. Or a longer time if using PE4F in a secondary role.
Closing Notes
1. The experiment so far has been a success.
2. The concepts, once understood, can be used and manipulated.
3. Good numerical notation is key.
4. Patience and a willingness to experiment outside of the original boundaries of the guidelines you set is also key.
5. Safety is not hard to follow as long as you do not let eagerness to try something new guide your actions.
Conclusion
The PE4F system is complex in how it works. Simple in execution. Time under pressure yields tissue deformation in a pattern based on intensity and duration. The unique point of the system is sheer speed of cycling. You can run a hand pump to the top end of intensity but you can’t go from 0-26HG In two seconds.
Doing this causes tissue fatigue that nothing else I’ve experimented does. Or so I have noted in my own use of this system type. Accelerated fatigue, sustained and controlled, using the tube as a template for my penis, caused girth growth and some curve correction. Continuing this would continue to offer growth and correction.
But I want to do a new project.
As far as the discomfort it is notable and constant. Cylinder pushes to pubic bone with force. You can take it or modify your setup to disperse some force.
I think for safety it’s still too advanced for newbies but that if you’re good at reading your PIs and are past the eager to increase intensity and duration part of your PE career that some patience and high pressure can likely make you gain.
