If You Could Choose To Be Any Size

You know average girth is 4.6 inches right? I put those numbers in on visualiser.net and it is a weird looking dick.

Well, I have but not with a penis that size but lets say an extra 4 inches left outside then. I think very aroused woman can take 7” on avarage maybe even 7,5” in porn they take lot more but they are not the avarage woman.

No, in porn they do not “take a lot more”, that is just what you have been led to believe. There are very few dudes in porn over 8 inches in length, and those who are, are rarely able to go in “balls deep”. There’s nearly always an inch or two left outside, looking all dry. There are no, I repeat NO 11 inch cocks in porn.

I have touched on how women are unable to take my full length or close to it. The fallacies and illusions of porn do not allow reality to be observed.

A poem calibrated worldview is a bleak one. However, if the realities of how sex works you take from pornographic images and video then of course you will believe all kinds of impossible things.

I let people think as they may. Ain’t no persuading you or I can do, ray.

+1

I don’t know what post in the thread you are adressing or if you are just making a statement with your opinion. However to be very clear this is what I believe from direct observation of women on film where there is no doubt about how long the objects they penetrate themselves with are.

Statement one: Almost all women can easily take 7 inches.

Statement two: A large part of the women that can take 7” can also take 7,5” like its nothing.

Statement three: In porn there are lots of women that take more than 7,5” up to 8-9” (mandingo balls deep in vagina).

Also just look up “julietta and magdalena twins dildo experiment”. They both take 7” like its nothing.

Not to argue the point but I think that video (“julietta and magdalena twins dildo experiment”) does more to suggest that there are some serious hard limits to consider in a non porn setting.

+1

I will just offer a reality check. You are taking the thread off topic but if you insist then I will talk about how ridiculous the female vaginal limitations that you insinuate actually are.

These “women on film” simply do not represent women in general. These cameramen filming these women have illusions to sell. Preparation for women in porn to perform sex all day is real. With any object. Much less the outsized dimensions that you insist are “real”.

Nope. I’ve done enough dildo experimentation to know that 6.5” is a cervical limit for most women I’ve slept with. Additionally most women I’ve slept with admit that 7” is a bit much.

Further, fully hard, due to girth women will bottom out sooner than 6” of my cock. I have watched this with 80% of my partners. Vaginas are quite finite.

Where are you getting statement 2 from? Porn measurement and EQ of a cock fully embedded in a girl are typically a mystery. This is a pure assumption. It only expands on the first statement, which is false and is more false because it’s simply inflated.

Reality is these men, who have a job to do, have been known to use both prosthetics or fuck while soft or not fully erect to finish a scene. Porn scene filming is arduous, filled with edits and lies. A 20 minute scene can take 6 hours to film.

Mandingo is the worst EQ culprit there is. He is seldom fully hard and his size versus his height in each film or the section of film in question varies dramatically. His penis is no reliable depth gauge.
[/QUOTE]

You base all of your so-called “facts” on porn, which is more fake than reality TV or Professional Wrestling on the WWE. Not any field research with your penis or any dildos on women, actual women, at all. It’s staggers me that you continue to purport all of this in every thread you post in.

Most of us to live on Earth and women generally work the same on Earth outside of the fantasy land that is pornography.

I do not assume that anything I have written will persuade you. It is simply for the benefit of others reading the thread so that you could stop taking it off topic. You do this in every thread you post in and there is no need. Just be fair and let people post the measurements they would like.

Wow, that “julietta and magdalena twins dildo experiment” on porn hub was way more exciting then I thought it would be. Just to make it easier to relate to, here is what the diameter of each dildo equates to in girth.

1.8” = 5.65” girth
2.0 “= 6.28” girth
2.4” = 7.54” girth
3.1” = 9.75” girth

“direct observation of women on film,” huh?

Ray has done porn. Has been on set with other male porn stars fucking female porn stars. That is “direct” observation in real life.

You have watched porn from a rather naive viewpoint as far as I can tell.

That is not “direct observation of women”. That’s just watching porn on a screen.

Porn is in no way a representation of reality. The analogy I like to use is Porn is like a Disney movie for masturbators. It is fantasy.

Porn is (and all professionally produced visual images) is a highly constructed and mediated. Lighting, camera framing, lens choice, casting all done to sell a particular fantasy.

I do not think that the dildos are perfect cylinders, therefore the circumference will be less than the one you expose.
For example I have 2 inches in width but nothing more than 5.5 inches in circumference in that same part.

My dream: 7.5NBPx6 / 6.5MSEG

I thought this exact same thing as I watched. But we are still derailing the thread.

I recently put a masking tape line across my transparent ruler, as I was finding it hard to discern which marks were sixteenths, eighths, or quarters. Left it on there because it makes it easy to monitor any gains that are “crossing the line” so to speak. One day I picked up the ruler and looked at it, and thought to myself “Really dude? You need to be bigger than that?”. A relatively recent poll on Thunder’s put 7.5” x 5.5” as the most popularly wished for size, and that is exactly what I have now. So, it seems silly to want more. I’d definitely take another quarter inch in girth though. Probably length too. But that’s not much, although I’m sure it would cross a line for quite a few women. I have to admit, when I read the question, before I have time to think about it rationally, my brain just blurts out “8” x 6 1/2” “. And I know why. That is my own best guess as to what porn star Nacho Vidal is packing. That thing just strikes me as cool looking. Childish reason? Sure. Impractical? Likely to regret it if I ever did get that big? Probably. As I say, 7.5” x5.5” is awesome. 7.75 x 5.75 would be super cool too. I will likely push on until I hit 8”x6”, which I may regret, but It’s hard to tell me much of anything. Or so I been told.

My experience has lead me to believe that these dimensions are right in the sweet spot. I’m not there yet. I am more suspect of the 7.75”, but I am fairly certain that the 5.5” girth and even up the 5.75” are more than welcomed.

Only serious sizes on the scale beyond deadly weapon, only hardcore