Originally Posted by HenrikL
And the other posters who also said what they thought was realistic like start with .25?
Using small goals to build confidence in yourself and the system is common. It works for weight loss and long duration training for endurance by starting small and works here. What they said was not to set big goals that don’t look reachable. That a series of small goals adds up to a big goal.
You shit on the concept of his big goal, with no real reason other than your personal opinion on PE. Not cool.
Quote
To TG and Kingcounty am I wrong saying most guys make an absolute max 2” gains if that, and thats with extreme effort.
Short answer, yes you are wrong. Most guys aren’t any one guy. There are guys who make 2 inches in under two years or 2 inches in more than ten years (one poster comes to mind) and how someone’s journey will shake out is ultimately the path of the user to walk. A generalization, especially a negative one, serves no good purpose to the OP or any beginner of PE.
Quote
Reading LG Hanger and several penis enlargement surgeons opinion I think this is correct.
What you think is correct doesn’t make anything fact or you an authority on anyone else’s success.
Quote
Also what is wrong about believing the following:
1 inch in first year of which 0.5” nbp if that.
Maybe if you are lucky you can gain another inch in the following 2-3 years of which 0.5nbp if that.
What is wrong with that? It doesn’t take into account the unique nature of each man’s PE reasoning, their health, weight, starting size and EQ or age. It’s literally some junk you aggregated on your own.
Bearded Dragon aggregated average cubic volume per year gains which bears out much closer to accurate by actually using stats in the database and actually finding the trends between them. It took him quite a long time to do so. His findings indicated that starting size wildly affected raw length and girth gains but that average cubic volume gains vasscilate in a similar fashion. Which translates to wildly different gain patterns as a rule of thumb based on actual numbers.
Please stop peddling junk you made up as fact on threads where newbies are asking for help. Offer advice based on things you’ve done and know about not just opinions and conjecture.
Quote
But hey look at the big survey on this site instead about avarage gains I believe they are way less than what I believe is maximally possible.
Average gains are just that. They have no bearing on what is maximally possible because not everyone will do PE indefinitely.
Originally Posted by HenrikL
I forgot vital information!This is more or less the real number on penis size:
Less than 5.5” -small
5.7-5.8” - The real avarage
6.05” - start of big 60% of young men are smaller than this size.
Only a small percentage of guys are 7.5” or bigger.
Almost nobody is 8.5” or bigger this is like a tenth of a percent of guys or even less.
All is NBP.
This is horse shit. If you want to extrapolate and cherry pick numbers until you create size ranges and percentiles you like you are literally purporting misinformation. Where are your cited sources for these very specific measurements and numbers?
And if you pick from multiple studies, your information cannot mix because literally you can’t pick the stats you like and exclude the rest. That isn’t how chatting empirical data works.
If you feel this way about penis size, fine. But studies, typically done bone pressed as a medical standard with select exception, do not support these claims and you don’t need to act like they are facts either.
Misinformation and pushing your opinion as fact is toxic. Do not do this.
This is a warning.