Excuse me in advance for my terrible English, please.
I subscribe what SPARKYX wrote; often Doctors discover the bicycle (or the boiled-water) only when everybody is using it, and after decades of professoral argumentation as : “This can’t exist!” - “Why?” -“Because we don’t have proofs it exists!”.
We could add that PE has the same treatment, by doctors, that bodybuilding/strength-training had: “There are not proofs it could work and is very dangerous - if you want to get strong a)take this pills and stay relaxed or b) you don’t need to be stronger, god gave you all muscles you need “.
But what is really interesting, is that there aren’t logical/scientifical argumentation against PE in the articles quoted, and maybe some logical error:
“He says that only swelling, caused by bleeding under the skin, could explain the increases in penis size men like Thomas experience.” -
If there aren’t studies that could proove that PE work and how - there aren’t studies that could proove that it can’t work and why, so is a “non sequitur” that only bleeding could explain gains; and :made this Doc an examination of Thomas penis, to verify the assumption he made?
“This result would not be permanent, hence the need to follow a rigorous jelqing regimen indefinitely.” -
They began saying : “We don’t have proofs of results”; continued saying: “This results will disappear” : how can die what isn’t born? The need of permanent PEing for mantaining gains proove that gains exists or not?
“The idea that the smooth muscle of the penis can be exercised , like the biceps, is a myth. “Smooth muscle doesn’t respond that way” -
Smooth muscle can’t grow? THERE IS SOME PROOF OF IT? This Doc is saying this :a) the smooth muscles doesn’t react in the same way the other muscles do; b) SO smooth muscle can’t grow - seem to me that we have another “non sequitur”. Also, we PEers don’t exercise the penis IN THE SAMEWAY the boybuilder works biceps - and BB doesn’t milk their muscles to become bigger.
“”Smooth muscle doesn’t respond that way,” Lue says. In fact, stretching it can be harmful. For example, the bladder is smooth muscle. According to Lue, if you hold in urine so that the bladder expands too much, the tissue weakens. What’s more, Lue says, all the stretching, pulling, and squeezing might cause scar tissue to form in the penis, which could hinder a man’s ability to get an erection.” -
The same error I talked. Also, is non pertinent the argument that too much stress could harm the penis muscles : this reasoning resemble to this :”Too much weight will torn your tendons/bones/muscles; SO lifting weigths can’t make your muscles/tendons/bones bigger/stronger.”
“Another nonsurgical method to lengthen the penis is by employing devices (or one’s own hands) that pull at the glans of the penis for extended periods of time. This is known as traction; where tissues under continuous tension will undergo stretching. If the applied tension is too large injury to the tissues or nerves of the penis can result. This is not recommended because it can forcibly tear off the vessels and other neurogical nerves thereby reducing the erectile functions of the penis. ” -
Idem.
Now, the point of these articles, seem to me, is this : how can we proove that PE work? Maybe I am a dummy, but for me the simplest and cheapest way is this :”Try this stuff seriously for 1 year; measure carefully your penis; if you see gains, PE work FOR YOU; if you don’t see gains 1) You are making some mistake; 2) PE don’t work FOR YOU.”
Who care of the other men? You want enlarge YOUR penis, right?