I see where you’re at iguana and can readily see why you’re rocking the ice, and even how if it’s used very sparingly [just enough time to “freeze” the collagen] that such methods are infinitely superior to doing a non stretched warmdown.
That said, for the point of PE science, and with no thought of disrespecting the other’s point of view, let’s put our lab coats on and think about this as brothers in the science of PE and all that…
While I understand your reasoning for ice, and even the fact that there’s efficacy here, what I doubt is that it’s optimal efficacy.
First, when researchers are conducting experiments with tissue samples to determine something [in this case, the elasticity of said tissue at given temperatures] they frequently make the conditions at which they collect a data point extreme to facilitate the liklihood of something to observe at said data collection point.
i.e. If they gather data at room temperature and at one degree below room temperature, then the spread of temp is so marginal as to hinder the formation of a conclusion. AND, formation of a conclusion is all they are after. So, what do they do? In the first stages of such investigations, they will get things very hot and then very cold and then take data at waypoints between [and including] the two poles.
However, just because such extremes [running the gamut between heating and icing] are used to create enough “space” between the data to form a solid conclusion, it in no way implies that said data [or techniques used to produce them] represent the optimal way to achieve the effect collected in the data set [locking lengthened collagen fibres]. Additionally, the data set was likely produced while usind dead tissue samples [rat tails]- sic. therefore, producing optimal results on LIVE tissues may be somewhat different than what were used to produce conclusive data in an experiment using dead tissues.
Secondly, One of your points for ice is that:
Originally Posted by iguana
I started with ice for several reasons. One, it has effectively been used by doctors, physical therapist for years to treat injuries, sprains, etc.
Again, while I understand the reasoning, and even the fact that there’s efficacy here, what I doubt is that it’s optimal efficacy.
What I question about this is the fact that making sure that the collagen fibres stay lengthened during cooling and using ice the way doctors and PT practitioners do seem to me to be totally different things. In fact, many of the reasons that doctors want to use ice as a curative [esp. it’s anti-inflamatory action] actually run contrary to what we want to do with PE.
My hypothesis would therefore run thus: IF you keep the penis maximally extended after your PE workout and allow it to cool gradually, and over as long a time as possible THEN you will minimalize the contraction of the collagenous tissues AND maximalize the amount of permanent elongation. I also assert that rapid temperature drops [as occurs when iicing said tissues] MUST NECESSARILY result in RAPID CONTRACTION, however miniscule, and should therefore be avoided.
When a doctor/Phys. therapist ices down tissues, he is avidly seeking this contractile response as well as seeking to slow down the metabolism of the affected area to hinder the buildup of injury metabolites. By doing so, he retards a percentage of the pain and tissue injury that may occur as a result of the trauma.
Very different stuff than what we are after in my opinion.
I now leave this open for the esteemed perusal of my colleague, Dr. Iguana.
:leftie: