Girth has been Solved for those in dire need of Circumference in Excess of 1 Inch.
That’s right. I’m approaching 13 years having gone from Trojan’s skinniest condoms to being unable to wear Magnum XL’s comfortably, I can’t imagine the tedious, risky, and psychological ridiculousness that comes with committing to years of methods that may or may not work, with no guaranteed timeframe. Oh and it didn’t take 13 years, it took only a few. I just point out the 13 years to point out the lack of complications since.
Let’s keep it real. Yes, I absolutely believe girth exercises can and do work for some here. And yes, I would probably recommend it over my methodology if we all knew it was performed in such a way (correct technique, intensity, and frequency) as to reduce chances of injury, but we can’t, and none of this stuff is standardized.
If you are sub-5inches circumference and are looking to be in excess of 6-inches in girth, then drop the pump, hanger, or clamp, and acknowledge that maybe… just maybe… girth enhancement WORKS in the most efficacious manner to date, proven by undeniable data ranging over a decade. I’m not speaking of Penuma (Elist & Company) nor Silicone Oil (Loria & Company), but rather, vetted practitioners & innovators in the field of male phalloplasty offering either:
(1) dermal fillers (non-surgical) that include: Hyaluronic Acid (HA), PMMA, Radiesse, Renuva, Ellanse, and Megafill;
(2) dermal grafts (surgical) that include: Alloderm, Surgimend (possibly under recall, but not for reasons of ineffectiveness), and Megaderm that act as tissue scaffolds;
(3) studied-backed (non-surgical) Protocols like P-Long and PhalBack.
These procedures are NOT without risk, but nor are exercises that put stress on (penile) tissues that otherwise are NOT muscles in the conventional sense. I’d contend/argue that spending 2+ years pushing your boundaries in manual PE is less likely to yield significant gains than seeing a qualified practitioner in the field of male phalloplasty.
I’ll concede that if you gain too significantly (compared to your original size), you may indeed sacrifice some naturalness (aesthetically). However, in most cases this is usually overlooked/unnoticed by partners who are having a great time in bed, or by men who choose not to go overboard. Partners that do question it, simply tell them it’s a congenital or an injury condition, and the case is closed.
I was compelled to post this after I realized how tough girth is (relative to length) to gain, and how SOLVED it has been despite guys going on and on about heat, conditioning, routines, and "what size is best," despite the obvious success of girth enhancement via male phalloplasty.
There will be those who wish to retain naturalness 100% and I respect that, but they also likely have the luxury of time & privacy commitments. I’m not discouraging those, and as I’ve said previously, it can work. However, for the many of use who may start thinner-than-preferred and wish to be larger-than-average may want to re-examine their approach. Sure, cost is high in this regard, but it’s akin to acquiring a luxury sports car, but at a fraction of the cost. So ask yourself, or better yet, tell me why I might be misguided in this regard.
Cheers.
If you're ever considering a surgical (or non-surgical) route for penis enlargement:
PhalloBoards: A Forum Devoted to Penis Enlargement Surgery & Non-Surgical Procedures