Girth theory: Pumping vs. clamping

Fascinating. I understands why, and that, you are not willing to discuss these issues in the forum.

The fact that you are considering extremely high weights as counterproductive for pe purposes is in line with much of the discussion in this thread (pudendum).

Interesting - my gf used to criticize my pe activities. Since I told her that there is no be better way to relax/meditate, in particular with hanging in a horizontal position, she is much less inclined to be so critical.

Link, please.

I had a tendency to agree with the study. More pointedly, I am not really sure you are forcing blood into the penis when you Kegel. You agreed that Kegels shortened the penis, ergo the LOT theory. Could this shortening increase pressure while not adding more blood?

Do you think that it is perhaps stimulating some stretch receptors that cause a parasympathetic response? The more receptors that are stimulated, the greater the response? Kinda’ like a feedback loop?

Good job, pudendum. The other study was really in striking contratiction to our experience :) .

In a peak erect penis, I believe you are absolutely correct. When the IC and BC muscles contract, any blood volume change comes from the translocation of blood from the unexposed penis exposed penis causing the pressure they noted. I believe you are adding little if any “new” blood, you’re simply moving blood in the cavernosa.

Now, after going so much into the details of the corpora cavernosa, I would like to address the corpus spongiosum.

It is connected to the glans, and many in this forum have complained about their ‘soft head’. The reason why the head and the corpus spongiosum MUST be softer than the corpora cavernosa is that they harbour the urethra. Too high pressure would make ejaculation impossible.

Yet, it would be cool to get tat head a little harder, and, more than that, a little bigger.

This is a BIG girth question, and I hope that we get into an interesting discussion.

Gentlemen, the steel spike stuff was split out of this thread and put into a new thread in the Experimental Forum. Not real keen of having the close to the edge stuff in the Main Member Forum.

Good call Thunder.

I’ve got several “further out” techniques that I may share. I don’t expect to because they’ve presented significantly difficult logistical parameters so as to make them impracticable (for me) or they simply haven’t resulted in gains. But if for some reasons it seems appropriate to post about them I’ll make sure to do so in the Experimental Forum.

I would be very happy if you would.

I also completely agree with thunderSS regarding the move of the nails/sonds to the experimental forum.

Nevertheless, it would be cool to discuss issues of glans and corpus cavernosum PE in this thread.

Yes it would, but the ignorati may not let us.

But the ignorati will let us discuss in the experiments forum.

Hmmmm….so, anybody with some common sense is dismissed as “ignorati” (perhaps by those who fancy themselves the illuminati…but appear closer to the moronati).

Thunder, why shouldn’t we have threads about guys ramming spikes down their pissholes in the General Forum? Surely, you don’t want to be numbered amongst the “ignorati”?

Maybe then I can post about my experiments regarding girth gains via rapid combustion (I fill my urethra with gun powder & a cork with a wick narrowly threaded through the cork. Then I place a double clamp at my base and 1 clamp around my glans…then, I light the wick).

I’m still accumulating the data. I’ll post when I’m satisfied with the accuracy of my findings.

:)