Men who should not be taught PE

Yeah I have an moral opinion, this is what it consist of a list of persons who should not be taught PE.

1- Pedophiles.
2- Rapist.
3- Fathers who neglect their children.
4- Males under the age of 18.
5- Husbands that neglect, and dwell not in knowledge with their wives.
6- Cheating Husbands and Men that cheat on their girlfriends.

But then how can these persons be weeded out. I know that the above list may insight anger amongst some people. However there is forgiveness for men who are repentant about past behavior. However molesting children is a serious and sickening crime which should be punished by prison and throw away the key. About “Rape” it should be dealt with the same as the pedophiles if the guy is truly guilty. Oh yes, I forgot “date rape.” When she says no it means “no,” even if she is just pretending. You got to protect yourself as well. Ask her to clarify what she means by “no.”

I hope this thread opens up some healthy dialogue. Add to the list if you want to.

Kingpole.

I agree that the list includes a bunch of men of dubious moral character (if any).. But I don’t see why this means we should go to lengths to make sure they don’t learn PE. I mean, unless a rapist gets a dick that’s literally so big (from PE) that he can physically hurt a girl.. I don’t see what the difference is between PE/no PE for these people.

All those people can pick up a gun or a kitchen knife or learn to box….. even if we’d rather they didn’t. What does it matter if they gain an inch on their penis?

If you feel happy following a set of restricting moral codes then by all means do so, but stop hurtling your moral judgements on others, you prude. (friendliest of tones) Any ways, how could you possibly restrict pure knowledge? It’s impossible. If you feel so strongly about this, get into psychotherapy or something to help these people.

Of the list:

#4, makes a marginal amount of sense because of a tendency toward youthful over-exuberance.

#’s 1 & 2, are already crimes on the books, no need to be ever vigilant to ensure that they never PE - thought these may not be great people.

And #’s 3,5 & 6, just makes absolutely no sense, what-so-ever.

It seems to be creative contortion to even attempt to link these things to PE. The only semi-connection is that some of these things are somewhat sex-related, and PE is sex related in that it evolves the penis. Other than that, there is no relevance.

Would rape be any less psychologically traumatic for the victim if the rapist had a penis that was 1/2” shorter??? Would a father be more attentive if his penis was 1/4” less thick??? (Unless he spends all his time PE’ing, but if he is that kind of guy, he’d occupy his time with something other than his children if it wasn’t PE)

There is just no relation in these people’s acts and PE. If there is a desire to discuss the Social Ills of these peoples acts, that is legitimate. And that would be legitimate because there are real consequences for these acts, but PE is not relevant to the discussion.

You can’t weed those people out. Period.

1- Pedophiles. A well known child advocate, representing only abused minors, and well known author Andrew Vachss mentioned in an interview once that most pedophiles never act on their impulses. In that case I’d say those who control their impulses should be able to benefit from pe as much as anyone. Those who do act on their impulses, personally I’d deny them access to air if I could.

2- Rapist. They are best served with a shot to the back of their head. As Doghound said, pe or no pe wouldn’t change a thing in their case. Big dick or small dick they damage the one they rape regardless.

3- Fathers who neglect their children. I believe that this happens a lot unintentionally and why then deny them the option to better themselves via pe and access to TP? For those who neglect their kids knowingly and willingly - they should die from shame. But how exactly does no pe make them assume responsibility for their parental duties? Or is that their “punishment”?

4- Males under the age of 18. I believe it is for legal reasons that minors aren’t allowed full access to TP, but I can think of a few good reasons why a minor should be allowed full access and be in a position where they can educate themselves on pe without restriction. For example, teens with a micro penis or who suffer from pe. Must be hell on earth for them to go through their teenage years like that.

5- Husbands that neglect, and dwell not in knowledge with their wives. Dwell not in knowledge with their wives? Care to explain what that means? My English is failing me.

6- Cheating Husbands and Men that cheat on their girlfriends. You think no pe will keep them from cheating?

#1 and #2 should be shot.

#3 Why would someone who neglect their children not be allowed to do PE? Should he invest that time in his children? I agree with that point but some people can do PE while they work and hit two birds with one stone. And the number one job for a father is to provide for his children.

#4 I would like to lower the age to do PE to 16. I rather have teenagers here so they can enlarge their penises with guidance of vets than they try to enlarge it without help and they mess up their dicks. Unfortunately the law prohibits that.

#5 PE should be a choice of the guy not of the wife/girlfriend etc. When the wife can’t take that she could take a divorce.

6 Do you really think preventing guys to do PE stops cheating?

About #6, I never really thought of that.
About #5, I need to clarify this more. If you are referring to dwelling in knowledge with wifeypoo. Yes, She may be wondering why your member has gotten so big, and why sex has improved. What I really meant was. If you have a sexually transmitted disease should you not disclose that to say a newly blushing bride. If one has HIV it should be disclosed to the sexual partner at the time.

About #4 Perhaps maybe an older brother can disclose PE info to a younger brother. Adult males run the risk of exposing a minor to sexually explicit materials to a minor which is illegal.
Persons under the age of 18 seem to be violating the “no” means “no” phrase more than those older than 18 due to lack of legal education and statutory rape laws which are in most states. They lack the maturity level.

About #3 Fathers who neglect their children they brought into this world should be flogged with a willow stick. Most children are first abandoned by their fathers or step fathers it is pandemic.
But then you can’t legislate PE I wish you could.

[QUOTE=The Beasty One]
If you feel happy following a set of restricting moral codes then by all means do so, but stop hurtling your moral judgements on others, you prude. (Friendliest of tones) Any ways, how could you possibly restrict pure knowledge? It’s impossible. If you feel so strongly about this, get into psychotherapy or something to help these people.
[/QUOT

I’m not a prude, well perhaps a little bit. I said this was an opinion. Everyone cast moral judgements. Your right about pure knowledge all person have acces to it including kooks. Think of it as a safeguard wish list. And what if God forbid PE becomes a federally regulated male health program with restricted laws?

I beleive that he who lacks self-discipline, the ones listed above, would fail to gain.

Yes, perhaps that comes under “you reap what you sow.”

King

I don’t really understand what you list has to do with PE and what PE has to do with morals. It’s like saying someone on your list shouldn’t be able to use a lawnmower. Some of the people listed on your list should be punished but PE should not even be in the equation.

Hey, don’t ruin the show.

I wanted to illicit feedback and other guys opinions. And I am getting feedback. I have a wild imagination sometimes always had one. I do scenarios in my head alot.

Just imagine some predator becoming even more of a predator after making some PE gains. I know it is like getting rid of all cars because someone got ran over. Or lets ban cars because teenage boys drag race down the boulevards of American cities, killing pedestrians.

Perhaps rape is based in low self opinions perhaps rapist need to prove that they are men. Perhaps they feel they have small members and in order to validate themselves they rape women. Sad isn’t it. Maybe PE would cause a reversal of certain so called morals like abandoning children to what ever fate life hands out Perhaps these fathers don’t feel they are worth being responsible due to low self esteem. Perhaps PE does the opposite beings it can increase self esteem. I think PE can either add to morals or subtract from morals. So I stated a few of my own. !# And 2# seem to be getting universal agreement so far.

Judgement on the other hand is based on the individual.

I agree with your list entirely but would add religious bigots.