Penis Size: The True Average

Please give the Forum Guidelines a read before posting again. Thanks.

For anyone interested here is the transcript to the interview with the doctor who performed the study.

http://thematin ggrounds.com/dr … terview-part-1/

Part 2 is not related to the research but some might find it interesting.

http://thematin ggrounds.com/dr … terview-part-2/

My penis is 7.5 inches long when erect, with 4.6 inch girth. 3.5 inch girth when flaccid and a length of 4 inches. What are your thoughts?

Very long with average girth. Good one.

They all seem to gauge it just like you said, and they all gauge the girth with their grip, too! ;)
In my “Pre-PE” days, I had a young chick for the first time stop in the middle of my strip down
session (she was already totally butt-naked) We were bumping and grinding, and I finally
helped her take off my jockeys, (off me LOL!) and she totally stopped and exclaimed that
it would be like her first time again, “I’ll be like a virgin once again, to YOU!” I think I was
maybe (going from memory here, fellas) 5.75 MEG, 6” Tops. Damn, she was TIGHT!
She said she could barely get her hand around it. SO they do gauge your unit, and
right away. She hardly noticed the length until later, it was dark and I was hitting bottom
so she would remember me ;) She insisted on lube _every time_ after that! I even
bought some just to insure I would be welcome :D

The best way to see if they gauge the length (and they will, if given the chance) is when
you get them in the BJ position. Then they do exactly like Bill10 said. Some of them
will do it every time! I miss my whore-doggin’ days, in that way. :rolleyes: :rofl:

Right On, Big Bill!

All of my girls did it to me during blowjobs. Some of them as I can recall even used an ok grip at the base and pushed back, while licking it.

My wife still does it sometimes, eye candy thing.

So women know bpel. That’s it.

I had one blue-eyed, big titty (38DD) do that, then a hand on top of that, and then a third, and mouth on the head!

No, she did not have 3 hands, she moved the first ;) Tried to keep the second in place, too. Small hands I guess!

To add, the foreskin needs to be pulled back on some dicks that way the head is exposed.

I think so too. But they also like to see something big on first look.
Shower and grower arguing is tricky too.
I am grower and have an inch of fat pad. So I need a full erection all the time, to my 6,5 BPEL look big. Because 5,5 NBPEL isn’t big, it is not even good average.. It is poor average, you know what I mean.

If you read the very first post on this thread, you will see that 5.5 NBPEL is on the high side of average.

I’ve been married for 25 years so average doesn’t matter anymore for me - I do it to make my wife squirm. Good thread

I have some brand new measurements, very cool!
I am getting a 5.5” x 5.5” “new normal”, sometimes it trends up a little bit to almost 6” in length.

Oh, NBPFL x MFG, I guess that matters ;) I never measured those before, with a ruler :D

BPFL would be a good bit more, I need to lose that fat pad! :( Is there a good section for weight/fat loss? :eek:

What I find interesting is the fact a relevant information from the study has gone unnoticed so far. It was analyzed and recorded by the researchers, but not factually written down:
In the paper (Women’s Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models | PLOS ONE), they report the penis size reported to be average graphically but don’t give any actual figure.

In fact, you can go here and grab the raw data, individual by individual: Women’s preferences for penis size: A new research method using selection among 3D models
From these raw data you can calculate the different average values and parameters:
Dimension cm in
Av length 14,6 5,76
SD length 2,0 0,79
Av girth 11,43 4,50
SD girth 1,8 0,71
Med girth 11,43 4,50
Correlation 0,446
See the attached picture for a raw data analysis (Raw data.png).
So for a woman, the perceived average length*girth is 5.76in(+-0.79)*4.5in(+-.71), with a 0.45 correlation coefficient.

This is perfectly in line withe the Dr Veale study (5.17in(+-0.65)*4.59in(+-.43)).

NB: the same analysis can be performed with the one night stand and long term relationship data:

One night stand:
Dimension cm in
Av length 16,3 6,41
SD length 2,7 1,05
Av girth 12,6 4,97
SD girth 2,3 0,90
Med girth 12,7 5,00
Correlation 0,299
See the attached picture for a raw data analysis (ONS.png).
I have added as well a picture of the "true" preference chart for one night stand (you know there are some stupid charts on the internet - this is another one).
Long term relationship:
Dimension cm in
Av length 16,2 6,37
SD length 2,4 0,93
Av girth 12,3 4,83
SD girth 2,3 0,89
Med girth 12,7 5,00
Correlation 0,351
See the attached picture for a raw data analysis (LTR.png).

All great information but can someone tell me why it’s important?

Cool graphics on that study, staline.

So 75 Californian women of various races aggregate preference is roughly a 6.5” x 5.0”. Or perhaps a 7x5 BP when accounting for their preferences being somewhere between BP and NBP.

Then when you factor in that the study was done with rigid, hard, cold, 3d-printed cylinders, and convert over to warm spongy flesh with a glans on top, and multiply the length times diameter plus width over girth divided by the angle of the tip squared, we naturally arrive back at the 8x6, wo(men’s) long known preferred size.