There seems to be a trend of extender users having poor heating experience with ultrasound despite the intensity they use. It is causing frustration in users after they have opposite experiences for some of the practitioners
Using hangers allowing the penis to be in tight contact with skin of the users limb are getting their shaft heated in significantly better rate, or at least they can feel the heat build up.
Placing one´s hand pressing the shaft against the transducer allows slightly better heat building experience as well.
It may well be the optimized transducer to shaft contact playing in our favor, but surely that can´t be all there is.
Ultrasound waves travel through the thin shaft so that the 3Mhz waves have lost only 50% of the intensity reaching the opposite site of the penis if the flaccid penis is 2,5 cm thick.
Using 1MHz application there is 60% of the intensity still left to reflect at certain percentage.
The out border at the surface of the skin does not absorb that still left intensity and certain amount of the intensity not reflected survives to been instantly attenuated exposed in the air.
When ultrasound reaches a boundary of two different medium here will be a reflection being relative to the difference of the acoustic impedance Z of the two substance.
Impedance is defined as Z = ρv, where ρ is the density of the medium (in kg/m3) and v is the speed of sound through the medium (in m/s). The units for Z are therefore kg/(m2 · s).
The intensity reflection coefficient a is defined as the ratio of the intensity of the reflected wave relative to the incident (transmitted) wave. This statement can be calculated as :
a = (Z2 - Z1 )^2 / (Z1 + Z2 )^2
The acoustic impedance of the air (Z2) being 420 (kg/(m2 · s)) and the skin (Z1) 1.99 × 10^6 (kg /(sec · m 2 )) the contrast being significant leads us to calculation:
a = (420- 1.99 × 10^6)^2 / (420- 1.99 × 10^6)^2
= -0.99957
Meaning 99.9 % of the intensity reflecting back against the beam of the ultrasound source.
The shape of the outer boundary of the skin acting as a lens reflecting all waves concentrating exactly against the most intense portion of the beam.
At the depth of 2.5 cm there is 1.0 w/cm^2 intensity still not attenuated in the tissue and this intense wave source counteracting the transducer beam intensity.
There have been discussion if the focusing multi wave collision actually would increase the intensity ,I do suspect opposite as a summary collision of the waves significantly attenuating the heating effect.
If we were at this point going increase the transducer intensity as a summary we would compensate the suspected loss.
But not to hurry there because it would lead us to unwanted adverse reactions via non-thermal effects of the ultrasound.
Standing waves induced cavitation is the thing we like to avoid as much as we can, and it is the resulting risk from the colliding waves.
Standing wave is a wave which oscillates in time but whose peak amplitude profile does not move in space.
"Standing waves occur when an ultrasound wave hits the interface between two different tissues, such as muscle and bone,
resulting in reflection of a percentage of the wave. The increased pressure produced in standing wave fields can cause transient cavitation and consequently free radical formation (Dyson et al, 1974)"
In our case skin and the air being the interfering pair of medium. Leaving these oscillating waves not traveling forward we lose the heating effect due absorption and what we get is the standing oscillating wave forming pressure pulses inside the tissue.
What we can do is remove the skin to air boundary by placing tiny piece of ours against or well formed, massive thigh and stretch it by hanger setup. Using conducting gel between there is no longer reflecting boundary left.
If we can´t leave the highly expensive extender of ours then other measures has to be taken producing same kind of outcome. There are ultrasound gel pads available to the thickness of 2cm to be placed firmly against the shaft.
There is also ultrasound standoffs available at many thickness. Ballistic gels or ultrasound phantom model gel also available, latter being really interesting product.
DIY ULTRASOUND PHANTOM GEL – Humimic Medical
If you are vegan you can brush a steak with a conductive gel and use it.
In conclusion there have been Manko showing increased urethral temperature for air exposed shaft.
My experiences with dual transducer set up suggest that placing opposing the identical waves, the heating effect diminishing and directing them on the same spot at lesser than 90 degrees amplifying the heating impact.
There have been studies published with opposing transducers resulting standing waves and cavitation.