Originally Posted by BeardedDragon
Collagen molecules arrange into triple helices to form microfibrils which then do the same to form fibrils, which then do the same to form full fibers, which then arrange themselves into bundles and alignments for whatever tissue they are a part of…
BD, that’s absolutely fantastic, that answer exceeded my expectations completely; thank you so much.
My guess, and it is just a guess, is that the level at which the separation/tearing occurs matters less than how the forces are probably affecting the overall structure.
Assuming the section of Tunica in the figure 1.a image (https://onlinel ibrary.wiley.co … 0X.1997.26511.x ) has been oriented with the fibres running top to bottom for the sake of the photo, and assuming that rather than running top to bottom, they actually wrap laterally around the diameter of the penis, then:
I think cock rings probably aren’t going to do much to help radial growth because they’re nowhere near going to create the kind of force that’s going to force the tunica into a shape where its torn areas are going to be held open.
Obviously I can’t say definitively, but if the object of a cock ring is to hold the rends/tears within the tunica open, it would have to hold it in the same position as in which those rends/tears were made, or at least close to, which a cock ring is probably not going to get anywhere near. It’s possible that people who see gains using a cock ring are seeing gains they’d have achieved whether they used one or not.
As for Cock Coils, I’m guessing, if you can’t do anything for girth, you may as well try and improve length, and a Cock Coil should probably help in that respect, assuming the Cock Coil should at least pull the gaps in the lateral strands open.
Xenolith seemed to believe that Cock Coils would only get you about 10% extra growth. If that’s correct, then 10% over (for example) 5 cycles, is an extra 50%, so assuming you can wear them comfortably and without issues, I’d say it’s totally worth doing (I myself used to hang weights like an ads; in comparison, Cock Coils as an ADS, are orders of magnitude more convenient.
But, having said that, if you go with the weights that Xeno recommended they’ll almost certainly do nothing for ligament stretching. They’re good for soft tissue, if the soft tissue is disrupted enough to create rends/tears in the fibres of the Tunica to begin with.
That’s all based on the assumption that the fibres run diametrically and not longitudinally.
So, yeah, I’d say Cock Coils are the way to go, and I’d also say that Cock Rings are probably ineffective as an aid to radial growth.
I’d imagine whatever growth or increase of size people are seeing through the use of cock rings are either due to improvements in e.q, growth they would have gotten anyway, or errors of perception.
Obviously the majority of people that support Cock Rings as an aid to radial growth will fight you tooth and nail to defend their position (because that’s just generally what people do with any belief), so I’d urge caution in trying to disabuse them of such a belief. As an addendum to that I’d suggest that just going along to get along with these people, and telling them what they want to hear, is technically potentially being an enabler, but…lets not go there.
Originally Posted by manko007
I’m sorry I remember now Xeno said that about the weight not the amount of ads use. Specifically when deciding whether 1 or 2 cc is enough. He says 1 is enough. And that a little weight is better than none and a lot is not much better than a little.
No need to apologies, I probably should have made that assumption; not sure why I didn’t. The more I thought about it, it began to seem more and more that he must have meant weight rather than time; I think not just assuming he meant weight was probably a mistake on my part.
I had read the post where he originally wrote that but hadn’t made a note of it and didn’t remember the context.
I’ve since read another post where it’s suggested that you don’t need to do that much ADS, just a little but at the right time (when the fibroblasts are laying down collagen?) but pinning down that time-frame isn’t something I have information on. That’s something I’d imagine BD would know, I think it was his progress thread in which that was suggested.
Originally Posted by manko007
Girth before lenght. Interesting. I had forgotten about that. I have been hanging one day prior to soft tissue work. But maybe it’s better the other way around based on your observations. Although, I can see with cc ads it would be ok. But hanging after soft tissue work would be rather brutal.
I’m not sure about that to be honest, I used to do very little soft tissue work when I was hanging, but don’t really remember if it had an effect on my hanging sets.
What I would say is that hanging is mainly focused on the ligs and to some extent the septum and has relatively little to do with soft tissue growth. Xeno ended up giving up hanging entirely in favour of two types of stretch, the Sumo Stretch and the Bucking Bronco stretch, and tissue disruption as part of an IPR routine. He basically abandoned hanging entirely.
Originally Posted by manko007
Regarding cock ring use. That thread describes a guy who clamped for 7min 3 times a week and wore a cock ring all day and night and gained 1.8 inches in girth. Hmmm
Generally speaking, cock rings might help with blood flow, which in turn might help growth, but I don’t think the expansion you’d get with a cock ring would be enough to force the tunica apart far enough to open up the rends/tears in such a way that it would help radial growth via that mechanism in any really meaningful way.
Also, that guy described in the thread might have been an outlier that would have gained anyway.
If it were possible to chart people’s potential for growth on a graph, you’d almost certainly get a bell curve, where the majority of people are closer to the middle of the curve than they are to either end. Those are unusual cases and, at least in terms of probability, it’s best (at lest to start off with) to work with the assumption that, as individuals, we’ll conform to the average. A method can’t really be proven by success of two or three people out of a thousand. If it only works for those 2 or 3 people and not the other 997 people, then all we can really say is that the method works, but only for 0.2 to 0.3 % of people.