Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

New York Texan's PRP Experiment

New York Texan's PRP Experiment

OK, I may have too much time on my hands, which can’t be true as busy as I am. But I am working from home, and it allows my mind to wander. I saw a study involving I think 1500 men (not animals) who underwent 6 PRP shots, with PGE-1 added, one per month, and followed a pump protocol. It may have involved stretching too, but I am going to use an extender for certain. The reported results were an average of 3.5 cm length and 3.0 cm circumference. So, I cut a deal with my doctor to try it. Yesterday was treatment one, followed by the requisite pump (light pressure, but with heat), and I am not in my Size Doctor extender for a few hours (with breaks). I have a second scheduled in about a month. So, I am following my basic routine, but adding the monthly PRP treatment. I will keep all advised! I can tell you have have the usual post-PRP increase, especially in girth, and the noticeable skin improvement (softer). I have had a number of prior PRP treatments, and tend to use it as a tune up of sorts, not really for size. Or, at least I decided size may not be a reasonably expected result for me. Now we will see.

Stay tuned. I think Runnels is doing something similar (study) with a doctor on the west coast.

Oh, BPSFL now is around 7+”, BPEL is right at 7”. Flaccid girth is around 5+, and full erect girth is over 5.5.” I do have a few (albeit not high quality) photos in the member section.

Other Thread

Don, yes! I actually loaded that study to that other thread a month or two ago. Thought I’d start this new thread to track current dedicated progress. One thing I noticed this morning is that when I removed the extender to make sure the head remains ok (two 3m Micropore strips plus a latex head cover) is that the girth on removal actually seems extremely large once tension was removed. I have seen this before where girth seems to respond to stretch. If I remember I will take a quick measure when I remove again.

Good luck.

Update 2 shots in

I have now had the second shot. I added a pic to the members section of today’s pump results. Remains to be seen if there is cause/effect to increase, we’ll see. Still using the same general protocol.

Hey NYT, thank you so much for this experiment and contribution.

Do you happen to have a link to that study?

Interestingly, I came up with that idea a few years ago. Never did it because I never put the dedication financially and time to install my infrastructure at home to do the PRP myself. It is possible, is not difficult, it requires some investment and of course research and study.

However, there is one key element that catch my attention of that study, and is the same conclusion that I came to, and that is the addition of PGE-1. It has to be in conjunction with PGE-1. So far, little evidence we have seen of length increase just with PRP shots throughout the years. However, nobody has tried it with PGE-1. That is why I am interested in that study. I myself experienced remarkable benefits in terms of growth by inducing controlled priapism through PGE-1 for a span of at least a year. It is scientifically researched and studied the effects of PGE-1 in smooth muscle tissue growth inside the CC.

I cannot stress enough, this PRP therapy MUST be done with PGE-1. A controlled priapism MUST be induced daily. This complemented with pumping and traction device, I have confidence that it could lead to interesting results.

In fact, This protocol is still in my list. My focus currently is to grow the septum for BPFSL as much as possible. If I can reach 11 inches for example of BPFSL while still having 9.5inches of BPEL, if conventional methods do not yield satisfactory and acceptable perceptual results, I will definitely consider producing my own PRP shots. But again, this HAS to be done with the addition of PGE-1. Otherwise, I really doubt, based on existing anecdotal experience and data, that PRP shots alone will produce a significant difference.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Igigi:

Thank you. I read about your thinking on PGE-1 as well. I think we have a couple different basic paths mapped out to consider, first being the study I think I attached before, but do again, the second being the protocol the Toronto doctor has attempted to patent through the years: Analytics for US Patent No. 7671091, Penis enlargement
Some of the size changes touted in the linked patent material verge on the unbelievable (3-plus inch gains), but it is an interesting read. He advocates some sort of other compounds (I think he calls them "activators") to further the effect (not PRP that I can gather in his descriptions), with relaxin being one (not easily available). You can read that (assuming the link comes up). Instinctively, it does seem as though some sort of peptide or other compound to activate Hgh or healing properties (or both) would also make sense.
As I think I said, a doctor on the West Coast is teaming with Runnels for some sort of study, more akin to the Chinese one, and I am pretty sure has to involve the "P-Shot." The study materials lack detail on how and when the PGE-1 was used, but I had wondered for some time why PGE-1 or similar compound wasn’t used at the same time to help the PRP "matrix" form better and to say in the penis longer post-injection. So, we are using a small amount of PGE-1 in each PRP syringe. I still do the post-injection pump, but very gingerly as the PGE-1 acts pretty quickly and I do not think one wants to pump very hard with that rigidity. It makes for an interesting departure from the clinic, past the nurses, etc….
The Toronto protocol has been followed somewhat by others here, but I cannot recall the one gentleman’s name who posted extensively. Apparently, that protocol calls for PGE-1 4 times per week, I assume rotating on an every other day basis. My concern on an every day injection (and even every other day, we’ll see) it that this is a lot of needles into the CC. I do use the very fine gauge insulin syringes, and understand proper methods. But I am still concerned about the cumulative impact. What I do intend to do is to try to go with the every other day injections for at least a few weeks post-PRP. I suspect I may not be bale to hit this exactly, because the world is starting to open again and I suspect I will be doing some traveling.
But…I agree with you that it just seems there’s a path here, and combining the PRP with the PGE-1 only makes sense. Wednesday (3 days ago) was shot number 2.
I’ll keep updating periodically. I welcome your input too.

Further update

After posting the last, I reviewed my prior messages, where I had measured right at 7” for BPEL. Today it was 7 1/8-plus…I should switch to mm.

Originally Posted by newyorktexan
Igigi:

Thank you. I read about your thinking on PGE-1 as well. I think we have a couple different basic paths mapped out to consider, first being the study I think I attached before, but do again, the second being the protocol the Toronto doctor has attempted to patent through the years: Analytics for US Patent No. 7671091, Penis enlargement
Some of the size changes touted in the linked patent material verge on the unbelievable (3-plus inch gains), but it is an interesting read. He advocates some sort of other compounds (I think he calls them "activators") to further the effect (not PRP that I can gather in his descriptions), with relaxin being one (not easily available). You can read that (assuming the link comes up). Instinctively, it does seem as though some sort of peptide or other compound to activate Hgh or healing properties (or both) would also make sense.
As I think I said, a doctor on the West Coast is teaming with Runnels for some sort of study, more akin to the Chinese one, and I am pretty sure has to involve the "P-Shot." The study materials lack detail on how and when the PGE-1 was used, but I had wondered for some time why PGE-1 or similar compound wasn’t used at the same time to help the PRP "matrix" form better and to say in the penis longer post-injection. So, we are using a small amount of PGE-1 in each PRP syringe. I still do the post-injection pump, but very gingerly as the PGE-1 acts pretty quickly and I do not think one wants to pump very hard with that rigidity. It makes for an interesting departure from the clinic, past the nurses, etc….
The Toronto protocol has been followed somewhat by others here, but I cannot recall the one gentleman’s name who posted extensively. Apparently, that protocol calls for PGE-1 4 times per week, I assume rotating on an every other day basis. My concern on an every day injection (and even every other day, we’ll see) it that this is a lot of needles into the CC. I do use the very fine gauge insulin syringes, and understand proper methods. But I am still concerned about the cumulative impact. What I do intend to do is to try to go with the every other day injections for at least a few weeks post-PRP. I suspect I may not be bale to hit this exactly, because the world is starting to open again and I suspect I will be doing some traveling.
But…I agree with you that it just seems there’s a path here, and combining the PRP with the PGE-1 only makes sense. Wednesday (3 days ago) was shot number 2.
I’ll keep updating periodically. I welcome your input too.

Yes I am aware of that patent that has existed for many years. It is basically the same I did. The fundamental protocol is to induce a controlled priapism for many hours during the day, every day. My research has gone way farther than that. Throughout the years I learned about the power and benefits of nutrient therapy and science, something that mainstream medicine has no knowledge nor training for it, and how this impacts not only penile health and potential but also health in general.

In my own anecdotal experience, my results were mostly in girth. My girth skyrocketed over an inch in a span of one year. This was due to my limiting factor, the septum. This treatment, PRP plus PGE-1 or any of them alone, will have no impact on the septum. The septum eventually became the dead end for everybody, and today we have the UltraSound method to grow the septum and create potential gap for new BPEL.

This is why I am currently concentrated strictly on the septum (BPFSL) which I already grew almost an inch and I am preparing to go into Period 2 in an attempt to grow the septum further more. Final goal is 12 inches but ideally would be 13. Once my difference between BPFSL and BPEL is significant, And as mentioned before conventional methods for BPEL do not yield positive satisfactory results, I will consider working on applying for the first time this method. PRP plus PGE-1 and perhaps other things I have been researching on.

I am glad you are doing this experiment and of course I wish you many inches of success. Stay positive and optimistic, stay focused. Keep the protocol and take advantage of those PGE-1 induced erections for pumping. No need to go hard on pumping. If you have a 100% erection induced by PGE-1, you just need a little bit of extra vacuum in the pump too promote that expansion of the tissues.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Originally Posted by newyorktexan
After posting the last, I reviewed my prior messages, where I had measured right at 7” for BPEL. Today it was 7 1/8-plus…I should switch to mm.

It is extremely useful to keep proper measurements. Ideally Pre and Post. Every day. Pre being the Pre exercise measurement, wether you are going by BPFSL or BPEL, and Post being the Post exercise measurement. To see the difference after. Of course part of that will be temporary, but over the course of days, weeks, a pattern will appear. If you measure every single day pre and post and write it down in your own log, it becomes extremely useful over time, and as your record for when you take a break and attempt to start a new period.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Thanks for the details. Interested.


BPEL: 5.5" --> 7.9" ; BPFSL: ~5.6" --> 8.5"

Progress log summary: Hanging with FIRe

"Going hard, fast and heavy is all against the scientific knowledge of tissue expansion or elongation." - Kyrpa

May Update

I have not been religious with the full protocol, but I do continue with the pump (with heat) and stretch protocol. I re-read prior chains here dating back a few years, and plan to step up the use of the trimix to 4 times a week, basically every other day, at least for a period of time. I have PRP shot #3 this week as well. Today I did use the trimix after a morning pump and about three hour stretch. I then (post injection) went back into the tube for very low pressure pumping under heat, releasing the pressure now and then. On removal I measured at 7 1/4”, so seemingly an increase again. Girth seems the same (5.5”). Usual post pump girth is 6”, but this measure (5/5”) post trimix was while diamond hard. The pumping with trimix is interesting, with a slight pain (you can definitely increase the pain with pressure) that I ascribe to the tunica trying to stretch to accommodate the maximum CC expansion. Seems in keeping with prior experiences by others. I plan to add IGF1-LR3 to the injection mix for the next round later this week.

I will report back in a few weeks.

May Addendum

As I typed the last post I had placed a low pressure ring on…after getting up I checked and saw/felt noticeable girth. Over 6”. I assume a combo from all before plus the ring, but quite encouraging still!

But would that be PRP and PGE-1 injections on the penis?

Hey NY thank you so much for sharing your progress. I am very interesting in the pathway.

How long is lasting each one of those Trimix induced erections?

And my other curiosity, why specifically you are going to add IGF-1Lr3? What I mean, why Lr3 and not DES or simply IGF-1 that is more researched and studied, not to mention that is extremely difficult to find and buy real receptor grade Lr3.


Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
PRP (Priapus Shot) Consultation: thoughtfulgoldthoughtfulgoldPenis Enlargement16512-10-2023 04:22 PM
PRP injecting - 20 minutes to add 1.5 inches in Girth?SteadyGainsPenis Enlargement2804-14-2019 12:33 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 PM.