Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

The characteristics of the tunica albuginea revisited

Another tip for the above exercise. I feel the best results when I fist push my flaccid shaft into my body and reduce the size of my unit. Then I twist it round and round while it is compact. Then when the longitudinal force is applied I feel the stretch. Then I grab my dick firmly and kegel. If I do not first compress my Dick and just have it at normal flaccid length and twist the effects are not felt much.

I tried this again without weights now and did it strictly manual. I feel a nice expansion and stretch of my Tunica. I also feel at after 30 seconds rotated in each direction, no additional benefit is derived. It seems like a decent stretch of the Tunica as a warm up and anything more will just end up toughening the tissues and can be counter productive as I mentioned in my post above.

Defined looking forward to the upcoming thread where Kyrpa’s new device is tested. It is important to understand the physics and physiology before we apply properly. Yeah, I have done a good amount of PE that was detrimental and was just conditioning and toughening my Dick. Learning a lot from the more scientific approaches and research taking place…


Starting (07/15/20): BPEL 6.5” BPFSL 6.5” MSEG 4.75” BEG 4.75” BPFL 4.5”

Current (10/27/20): BPEL 7.0” BPFSL 7.5” MSEG 5.0”+ BEG 5.25” BPFL 5.25-5.75”

Goal: BPEL 7.5” MSEG 5.5” BEG 6.0” BPFL 6.5”

What are your thoughts on working the tunica
while in a vacuum tube?

I know Igigi is experimenting with water pumping and heating the water with an IR lamp.

What about if we used the Therasound Evo w/Autosound which Tut mentioned.
If it where strapped to Dick and placed inside a large cylinder so vacuum could be achieved???
We could also do length restricted pumping as well.

Trying not to derail this thread but am very interested in the science as well as the application of the science to make the magic happen.

BettyMills: Richmar, EVO Series Accessory, AutoSound Hands Free Ultrasound Applicator - Fabrication Enterprises 69-0226 EA - Betty Mills


Starting (07/15/20): BPEL 6.5” BPFSL 6.5” MSEG 4.75” BEG 4.75” BPFL 4.5”

Current (10/27/20): BPEL 7.0” BPFSL 7.5” MSEG 5.0”+ BEG 5.25” BPFL 5.25-5.75”

Goal: BPEL 7.5” MSEG 5.5” BEG 6.0” BPFL 6.5”

Trying Not To, Still Are

This really is not the venue.

I suggest you to hold your horses and I Will get into it on my volume 2 progress log.

It is where the techniques will be laid out eventually.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Great thread.

The load calculator doesn’t work in numbers although the xls files are supported.

It seems that some formulas can’t be imported.

Can somebody help me and give the numbers for 100 mm flaccid girth ?

That would be nice. Thank you.


Back in 2010: 13.5 cm today: 17 cm

Girth in 2010: 11.5 cm today: 14 cm

Originally Posted by undacover
Great thread.
The load calculator doesn’t work in numbers although the xls files are supported.
It seems that some formulas can’t be imported.
Can somebody help me and give the numbers for 100 mm flaccid girth ?
That would be nice. Thank you.

Maybe you could rename the file with .xlsx which apparently is not a supported filetype on this forum platform.

Load equal table for circumference from 70 to 160mm covering stress thresholds 0.10 MPa and 0.17MPa in attached file.

Loadequals.webp
(28.0 KB, 389 views)

START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Thank you, Kyrpa.

I bought a luggage weight scale a couple of days ago and did some stretching to get back into PE after some years of inactivity.

Yesterday I measured 2.5 kg of load what I consider a stretch in my gaining zone.

Your load table recommends 2.4 kg. That is amazing.

Seems you might be onto something.


Back in 2010: 13.5 cm today: 17 cm

Girth in 2010: 11.5 cm today: 14 cm

Originally Posted by undacover
Thank you, Kyrpa.
I bought a luggage weight scale a couple of days ago and did some stretching to get back into PE after some years of inactivity.
Yesterday I measured 2.5 kg of load what I consider a stretch in my gaining zone.
Your load table recommends 2.4 kg. That is amazing.
Seems you might be onto something.

Hopefully, you get some extra confidence from what I have been onto for a couple of years now in your aspiration for extra size.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

What I don’t understand @Kyrpa, is how do you convert MPa to mmHG? I have done the math and it seems wrong, what values are you using for converting MPa to mmHG?

Are using the load calculator and the converting the values to mmHG? Or what are you exactly doing?

I have done the math and MPa to mmHG seems plain wrong:

0.10 MPa = 750.06mmHG(aprox.) - Which is an absurd amount of pressure. But you are stating that 0.17 MPa is aprox.250mmHG of clamp pressure. Should clamp pressure be calculated differently?

- What is the difference between mmHG of air pressure and clamping pressure? Is there any? Am I missing something?

- How are you converting those values?

- Are you using n/mm2 as in the calculator then converting to MPa?

Could you elaborate a little bit more? I am really intrigued.

Originally Posted by fdersby8
What I don’t understand @Kyrpa, is how do you convert MPa to mmHG? I have done the math and it seems wrong, what values are you using for converting MPa to mmHG?

Are using the load calculator and the converting the values to mmHG? Or what are you exactly doing?

I have done the math and MPa to mmHG seems plain wrong:

0.10 MPa = 750.06mmHG(aprox.) - Which is an absurd amount of pressure. But you are stating that 0.17 MPa is aprox.250mmHG of clamp pressure. Should clamp pressure be calculated differently?

- What is the difference between mmHG of air pressure and clamping pressure? Is there any? Am I missing something?

- How are you converting those values?

- Are you using n/mm2 as in the calculator then converting to MPa?

Could you elaborate a little bit more? I am really intrigued.

I am not doing what you are suggesting at all when talking about stress levels at TA when clamping.

The stress at the TA is not a straightforward conversion of inner pressure. It simply can´t be done that easily.

The stress at TA when the chambers are pressurized comes from the equation worthless to try even open. The shape of the chamber, in this case, double chamber divided with the septum dictates how the inner pressure results as a stress on the TA.

Otherwise, than by modeling and simulating with modern technology, it would very demanding task to try to measure or calculate. We can find equations on how to solve longitudinal forces and tangential forces on one chamber’s thin-walled pressurized cylinders, but they are completely useless in the case of the cavernous chambers.

What I am doing, in the case of clamping resulting stress at TA, is that I am referring to this attached research. The stress has been simulated at different pressure levels inside the anatomically correctly modeled cavernous chambers.

Hopefully, this helped you to get on track with what is actually going on inside the penis when clamped, and elevating the pressure further.
You can find the stress level being 0.14MPa at 200 mmHG.

Attached Files
121004_1.pdf
(695.2 KB, 80 views)

START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Correction coming later on certain stress numbers.

As it was 100mmHg intracavernous pressure already resulting 0.149MPa stress at TA.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

@Kyrpa
Wow, thank you so much, that clarified it! Why I can’t find such interesting studies!?

On a side note:

- How do you find so much useful information?

- Do you use google scholar to research academic papers and such? Because even tho I have been for quite some time researching academic papers about collagen matrix, tons and tons of penile studies I have never come across such interesting ones.


Last edited by fdersby8 : 11-03-2021 at .

Originally Posted by fdersby8
@Kyrpa
Wow, thank you so much, that clarified it! Why I can’t find such interesting studies!?

On a side note:

- How do you find so much useful information?

- Do you use google scholar to research academic papers and such? Because even tho I have been for quite some time researching academic papers about collagen matrix, tons and tons of penile studies I have never come across such interesting ones.

I am certain you will, but not until you find the right questions and therefore right terms for searches.
That was the case with me as well, when the understanding is at a certain level it did open in a different light.

The most important is to read the whole paper and the most importantly the references catalog . It is where the information usually is found and expanded further.
You can use the Sci-hub extension in your browser to get the full papers.

Like we know, we are not alone and I think that Google knows me at this point very well and does serve some diamonds every now and then.


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

Originally Posted by undacover
There are some really interesting studies published online I must say.
Found this today Anti-lysyl oxidase combined with a vacuum device induces penile lengthening by remodeling the tunica albuginea

This one has several threads at the TP already.
You may like to check them out


START 18/13.15 cm Jul 24th 18 (7.09/5.18") NOW 22.5/15.2 cm Fer 12th 20 (8.86/5.98") GOAL 8.5"/ 6"

When connective tissue is stretched within therapeutic temperatures ranging 102 to 110 F (38.9- 43.3 C), the amount of structural weakening produced by a given amount of tissue elongation varies inversely with the temperature. This is apparently related to the progressive increase in the viscous flow properties of the collagenous tissue when it is heated. (Warren et al (1971,1976)

How do you know your Mpa? I don’t think I understand that part


Starting measurements: Oct 2 2021: NBPFL 4" (10cm), BPFSL 5.7/8" (14.9ish cm), NPBEL 5.5" (13.9cm), BPEL: 5.75" (14.6cm), EG 4.5",

Current Measurements: Jan 11 2022: NBFSL 15 cm, BPFSL 17 cm, NPBEL 13.9 cm, BPEL 15.4 cm

Goals: BPEL 7.25" (18.4cm), NPBEL 7" (17.7cm), EG 6", Flaccid 5.5" Dream: NBPEL 8" (20.3cm), EG 6.5", Flaccid 6"

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.